Posts Tagged ‘Vanderboegh’

“The Darkest of Thoughts”

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

Sipsey Street Irregular Mike Vanderboegh writes to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, and explains that there’s an ugly fight coming. “No more free Wacos”, says Mike, and he’s not talking about religious whackos having free reign to to rape children and kill cops; he’s talking about the Federal Government burning men, women, and children who do not toe the line, and then blocking any investigation.

The inspiration for this piece is the case of David Olofson, now rotting in prison because he was in possession of a malfunctioning semi-automatic rifle. He threatened no one, he didn’t offer to sell it, he didn’t claim it was a machine gun. The malfunction was a dangerous one that could easily injure the shooter; there is video of the BATFX technician holding it well away from his body while testing, in case it blew up in his hand.

And yet Olofson was charged and convicted with possession of an unlicensed full-auto machine gun.

- By your department’s failure to restrain [BATX Field Agent Jody] Keeku’s outrageous conduct in returning the weapon to the ATF Testing Branch after it had been found by them NOT TO BE A MACHINEGUN but simply a malfunctioning semiauto rifle, with the demand that they retest it until they came to her opinion;

- By the trial judge’s refusal to allow defense experts to even examine the weapon; and

- By the appellate court’s blind refusal to allow a new trial based on these and other prosecutorial misdeeds,

Those are issues specific to Olofson’s case. Here are the broader implications:

if we can no longer count on a fair trial in a case of obvious ATF misconduct, then rationally, we have no reasonable expectation of a fair trial at all. In that case, we then are faced, when approached by any law enforcement officer attempting to enforce any gun law, with a Hobson’s choice:

- Submit, and be railroaded unfairly into prison, or

- Resist, and endure not only the personal consequences of that defiance, but also the likely consequences of a regional or even national conflagration.

Read the whole thing, please, as you value your life of peace and freedom.

Right now there’s a debate raging about whether or not gun owners should go about openly carrying and displaying their firearms, particularly handguns in a holster, in states that allow them to do so legally.

Read that again: informed, reasonable, law abiding, gun owners, people who have up till now been strong advocates for the right to keep and bear arms, are afraid to exercise their legal, lawful right. It might upset people. It might bring them in conflict with law officers, many of whom are very unaccustomed to and nervous around unbadged law-abiding citizens who happen to be armed.

There was an incident recently where a woman was threatened with arrest or shooting for wearing an empty leather holster at a Second Amendment protest.

A right is not a right if you can’t use it. I don’t care if it upsets people “scares the white folks”, to echo the response to Negroes eating at whites-only lunch counters, and riding up front in the bus.

This isn’t about “recruitment”. Not even about “acclimatisation”.

This is about putting our government, and our fellow citizens, on notice. We’ve been pushed right up to the line, and the trench grave lies on the other side.

Not backing down. Not hiding.

Not compromising.

Especially not compromising, because we’ve been compromising since nineteen thirty four, and all we have to show for it is a single, 5-4 Supreme Court ruling that yes, the Second protects an individual right, but no, the government can infringe it pretty much any way it wants, short of a total ban.

For all that, we at least want to be able to carry our legal weapons on our hips, in public.

Our empty holsters, even.

Listening, Mr. Holder? Hear the trumpets, hear the pipers? The one hundred million angles singing? The multitudes are marching to the big kettle drum, and they’re coming for you.

You swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic, Mr. Holder. Uphold that oath, live it, breath it — or wait for the day when you can no longer escape being caught out as one of those the rest of us are defending it from. Your oath is wearing pretty god damned thin.

Wake up. Listen.

You will lose if you fight us.

The Laws Are Hidden, But You Must Follow Them Anyway

Saturday, August 29th, 2009

Mike Vanderboegh provides us with a very illuminating court transcript. If I understand the situation correctly, what’s going on here is a federal agency, the BATFX (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives), tried to convict a Mr. Larry Friesen of trafficking in machine guns by selling a part (a “tube”) that might be used in a machine gun. Friesen demanded that they reveal, in court, the exact procedures used to determine that he was in violation.

…[I]n the end this was about protecting their secret documents. These documents, no matter what spin they put on them, are in the final analysis just rules, regulations, policies and testing procedures that ought to be in the public domain. They refuse to release tham because then they couldn’t change the rules to suit themselves in whatever particular case they’re running.

when poor old Jimmy Vann just couldn’t find his “lost” documents, I laughed so hard I almost peed myself. He used every excuse except the dog ate his homework. When they realized they would have to drop the case or reveal some of their precious documents, they cockroached, headed for the base boards and Friesen walked on a misdeamenor after they’d spent at least a million dollars and years of work trying to put him in federal prison with real criminals like MS-13.

Therefore, and tell me if I’m wrong, the real lesson here is that if you are indicted by the ATF for anything, just have your lawyers work it out to threaten the disclosure of one or more ATF “secret documents,” and you’re home free.

Vanderboegh Vindicated

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Over at the Bitch Girls:

A hunter who was checking into a Denver hotel yesterday before his trip to Africa was arrested for “unlawfully” carrying a gun – in rifle cases safely.  Unfortunately, Democrats are staying in the hotel.  So the cops hauled him off and only released him after he posted $10,000.

He is being investigated to see if his rifles have dangerous features – like a scope.

I started to respond in comments there, but it grew, so I’m making a full post of it here.

There was that big Mike Vanderboegh brouhaha a couple of weeks ago, about how citizens standing their ground for their right to keep and bear made us all look like crazed loons. (The big thread was over at Snowflakes in Hell, but that site’s down at the moment. I’ll put the link in when I can confirm it.)

This proves Vanderboegh was bang on: Those who want to take our rights away from us already think we’re dangerous lunatics.

Is it time to march on statehouses, courthouses, and Congress? Time to man the barricades? Time to openly revolt?

No, of course not quite yet.

It is, however, time for individuals to simply stand for themselves and say “No”. to make “cold dead hands” more than a slogan.

Now, I pray I will not be faced with this choice any time soon, but I pray that if I am, I will be able to take one or two jackboots with me.

I probably won’t, of course, because I doubt I’ll be given the opportunity to so much as flick off the safety. And if I am, I seriously doubt I’ll be able to bring myself to actually shoot another human being, as much as my freedom might depend on it.

That’s one of the problems here: on the battle field, a new recruit can depend on the veterans to fight for a volley or two while he gets his wits and his courage together, and overcomes his natural reluctance to kill. In a hotel lobby surrounded by non-combatants, with your guns all in cases, or during what seems to be a routine traffic stop, or in your bedroom at three a.m., you simply do not have the luxury of even a second’s hesitation, or the example of more experienced soldiers around you. And you know, absolutely, that you will die in the encounter, that you will never have the chance to argue in defense of your actions.

That’s hard, and when that starts happening, it’s going to be up to us to pile on in defense of our fallen comrades, and not spurn their corpses because they failed to follow the enemy’s rules of engagement to the letter.

In this case, Calanchini threatened NO ONE. He just wanted a room, a shower, a meal and a bed. His greatest crime was that he didn’t care enough about politics to know that a Big Important For His Own Damn Good Democratic Convention was in town, or that the particular hotel he choose had been taken over by by people who hate him and think he’s the crazy one.

I mean, Christ, he had GUNS! Plural, guns! Including handguns! Of course he’s dangerous bad crazy! Think of all the children he could have killed! Or Democrats, same thing!

===

This stands as a warning to all the Fudds and Zumbos out there. Just because you’re a hunter, doesn’t mean you can afford to think you’re above the fray. The grabbers absolutely want your guns too, and you with them. To them, you are as crazy and as dangerous as we are.

===

Meanwhile, Muslim terrorists, real crazies who, so far beyond standing their ground and fighting back, deliberately kill innocents, are deferred and kowtowed to at every opportunity.

===

Uncle points out, “This isn’t going to help Democrats appeal to the gun owner demographic.”

No, but then, they never really wanted to. This simply confirms which demographic they are appealing to.