Posts Tagged ‘Self-defense’

Justified Shooting

Saturday, October 25th, 2008

[update: Thanks to David Hardy of Arms and the Law for the link.]

Keep in mind, as you read what follows, that I am not a lawyer, just a citizen trying his best to understand the rules I’m expected to live under.

Mark Bennett, a criminal defense lawyer here in Houston, on his blog Defending People, forwards “notes from the portion of DEA training dealing with the use of deadly force. [My source] tells me that the students would be given certain fact patterns and told to stand up in class and respond with the exact phrases described in the notes to justify a shooting.”

This is life-and-death crucial, but very long, so I’m reproducing the whole thing, with my comments, below the fold: (more…)

The Lioness

Wednesday, September 24th, 2008

The most important thing I’ve posted for the women and girls in my audience ever:

The National Firearms Association, the Canadian equivalent of the NRA, puts out this amazing pamphlet [PDF] on some very simple self-defense moves allowing you to disable and escape from a would-be rapist.

No gun needed.

The Lioness correctly notes that the most important element of self-defense is not any particular weapon or skill, but simply the spring-loaded decision to meet violence with violence:

When a rape begins, there is no one there but you and the rapist. When it ends, there is still no one there but you and the rapist. When it ends, you will be dead, or alive but physically and emotionally shattered, probably permanently. You may also be pregnant, or under sentence of death from the AIDS infection he just gave you. Rapists don’t use condoms.

The police don’t come during a rape; they come afterward. It is vanishingly rare to find an instance where a rape has been interrupted or prevented by anyone but the intended victim.

When that realization hits you, you have ten seconds. Within ten seconds, your attacker should be incapacitated, unconscious, or running for his life; or you’ve probably lost. A good fight is short, sharp, and decisive, not a movie-style brawl. Would you like to learn how to end your rapist’s career?

If you believe that you cannot injure another human being, this training is not for you.

If you believe that it is proper to stop a violent criminal to save yourself and others, it is.

None of what you have just learned will do you any good whatever, if you wait until the realization hits you to decide what to do. You’ll take too much time to make the decision.

The Lioness may be printed and distributed freely, as long as it unchanged from the original. There are high-quality PDFs of each page suitable for sending to your local printer.

Along the same lines, read Lawdog’s “Appropriate Countermeasures to the Front Chokehold”, which cannot be safely excerpted, and by that I don’t mean “Not Safe For Work”, I mean “might result in accidental injury or death”. You must read the whole thing.


For a very long time, official sources have promulgated the myth that if you are being raped, the best thing to do is to cooperate. Fighting back, it’s been alleged, just makes the guy mad, and results in greater injuries. Purse snatching, mugging, rape, home invasion, doesn’t matter: just give the guy what he wants.

That turns out not to be the case.

Fighting a potential rapist might anger him, but likely he’s acting out of rage anyway, says the psychologist.

Fighting an intended attacker might provoke him, but he’s already trying to force his body into yours, says the criminologist.

Fighting off a man who’s trying to have sex with you against your will might hurt you, but nothing matches the pain of a completed sexual assault, says the rape advocate. ["Rape advocate"? Was the editor on this article on coffee break? -- djm]

Fighting a man hand-to-hand transfers his hair or skin cells onto you, helping police track him down, says the self-defense coach.

And fighting back increases your odds of escaping unraped because most rapists are looking for an easy target, said a prominent criminal justice professor who studies how women avoid rape.

“The odds of getting away are increased when you fight back,” said Sarah E. Ullman, who teaches at the University of Illinois at Chicago, who tracks how women manage to escape sexual assault.

“(Rapists) don’t expect a forceful response. If they get that, they may be quickly deterred and that may be all it takes to stop the assault.”


Once a woman has decided to put up a fight, the strategy is clear: Be active, confident and forceful. Attack the rapist’s vulnerabilities: his groin, his eyes. [And ankles and knees and Adam's Apple -- djm] Playing victim won’t work, Ullman said. Neither will begging, pleading, crying or negotiating. Talking to stall when confronted in a public place or business may allow passersby or customers to interrupt the attack, but assertive commands can also buy time and give the woman a chance to run away. And a woman wielding a weapon to a stranger is less likely to have the rape completed.


“Women are socialized to not make a scene, to take care of other people’s feelings, to not assume the worst,” Ullman said. “Trust your instincts. If something doesn’t feel right, it isn’t right.

“Don’t worry about making a scene.”

Victor Not Victim

Sunday, July 6th, 2008

Rob Allen at Sharp as a Marble serves up a clip from Austin’s KXAN, showing a woman who successfully defended herself against a goblin who broke into her home shortly after she was dropped off by a friend.

A few points:

Allen says he was “…dismayed to see [the gun] stored in a cupboard…”

If that were me, and I was being interviewed on camera, with as much identifying information as KXAN gave, I wouldn’t show it in its usual hiding place, either.

===

Citizen Burgos says she was attacked in her yard, and had to run inside to get her gun.

She’s lucky she was able to get inside to retrieve her weapon. This is a good argument for always carrying, but I’ll bet that up till now she’s thought a CHL class, and all the trouble you have to go through to exercise the license once you have it, seemed like more trouble than it was worth. I wonder if she’s changed her mind on that.

I also wonder if she knows about the petition to allow Open Carrry here in Texas.

===

Um, I have more comments on her foresight, but I’m reluctant to publicly speculate any further on her security arrangements.

===

Citizen Burgos reports she displayed her weapon, and Goblin Benavides didn’t back down and go away. In fact, he covered her mouth and was smothering her. She thinks she would have died without her gun.

Gb. Benavides says he wanted her cellphone.

So:

Mr. Goblin has essentially declared that her cell phone was worth a human life. He simply didn’t expect that it would be his own.

Raise your hand, all you folks declaring how “hot” Ct.Burgos is, who think Gb. Benavides would have been satisfied with the phone, if she hadn’t been able to stop him.

(I’m also very disturbed by the timing of this attack– Gb. B. came over the fence just as Burgos came home at three o’clock in the morning. It’s hard not to think that he knew her schedule, and was lying in wait for her. More trouble than a cell-phone would have been worth, I’d think.)

===

We often talk of “first responders”, meaning cops, firemen, and EMTs. In this case, Ct. Burgos was her own “first responder”, and that’s the way it should always be.

With this action, she shows herself to be a member in good standing of the “militia” the Second Amendment refers to.

===

Oh, and I take issue with KXAN referring to her as an “attack victim”.

She most certainly was not a victim, but a victor, a title she is able to claim solely because she was armed, and was willing to use deadly force to defend herself.

I also take issue with KXAN’s claim that she “credited” her gun with her survival. Not too harshly, because I see what they mean, but the credit is all to her.

Tools get neither credit nor blame; only the hand that wields them deserve that.

Can We Trust Megan McArdle With a Gun?

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

Over at the Atlantic, Megan McArdle ponders:

So if Heller, as libertarians devoutly hope, legalizes gun ownership in DC, the question immediately arises for those of us who live here: buy one, or not? On the one hand, they are expensive, and shooting ranges far away. On the other hand, I live alone in an apartment that is something less than amply fortified. On the third hand, I’m pretty sure I shouldn’t handle a gun when I’m sleepy.

First of all, as one of her commenters noted, it’s not “the third hand”, it’s “the gripping hand“.

Beyond that, the short answer is, “Of course!”

And to answer Megan’s objections, perfectly acceptable home defense guns start at about $150; excellent choices can be had for around $500. That’s pretty cheap insurance.

And if you can’t deal with a firearm when sleepy, how will you deal with a rapist who will not accept “lemme go back to sleep” as an answer?

Click for the long answer: Show ▼

In a separate comment, I also responded to some of her commenters:

TW said: “Don’t buy a gun just because you can.”

In my mind, “Just because I can” is a fine reason to buy a gun. You do not need any reason or excuse to exercise a right, particularly one protected by the Constitution.

Oh, absolutely, as I’ve said in an earlier reply which appears to be still pending, take lessons and think hard about how you will use the thing.

However, do not let the training process daunt you. We’re talking about a couple of hours of classroom instruction and a couple of hours on the range, at most. You probably spent more time learning the far more complex task of driving.

And with no training or introspection at all, I trust you — Yes, YOU, Citizen! — with a gun far more than I trust the government with so much as a paperclip. A file cabinet is a far more dangerous weapon than any bomb.

Owning a gun is the only way to truly understand the rights and responsibilities appertaining thereto. Buying a gun is the best way of learning just how radically that right has been infringed.

Buy the gun, Megan. Join the free

Several folks recommended she get a dog. Well, yes, a dog is a fine companion and a pretty good goblin alarm. Do not, however, delegate your security to a critter who can be bribed with a piece of steak or a belly rub, or who can be repeatedly tricked into chasing after a ball that was, in fact, never thrown.

What is the deal with thinking that dogs can be trusted with life and death decisions but humans cannot?

Sheep

Sunday, May 18th, 2008

Awhile back I referenced LTC David Grossman’s excellent essay “On Sheep, Sheepdogs, and Wolves“, which explains the cost of pacifism and the difference between defensive violence and predatory violence.

Click “Show” to read the whole thing. Show ▼

The sheep metaphor is a powerful one, and appears in at least two parables I know of, and just now ran across again.

First, Charles Riggs “The Parable of the Sheep“, about some sheep who decide to arm themselves against a wolfpack, and the response they get from the rest of the flock.

Show ▼

Then there’s Oleg Volk’s fable of “The Good Shepherd“. I’ve mentioned Volk several times. His photo essay “Self Defense: A Human Right” is required if you claim to be well-informed on gun control. You do not have to agree with Volk, but you must be able to answer him if you want your opinions on the topic to have any weight.

Show ▼

Support Package

Sunday, April 20th, 2008

FORCE THE DOOR written in condensation on a glass window

From The New Scotsman, via Ken Lammers:

For almost 13 hours, the woman had been held hostage at knifepoint by a convicted sex attacker who repeatedly raped her as police stood outside his home trying to negotiate her release.

But when Sean McKay fell asleep, his terrified victim finally saw the chance to end her horrific ordeal.

She could not risk wakening him by calling out to the police, but she was able to scrawl the message, “Force the door”, in condensation on a window for officers to see. She then rushed to the front door, and began to haul at the furniture that McKay had stacked behind it as a barricade, while police pushed from the other side. The officers managed to pull her to safety just as McKay woke up, dashed into the hall and tried to grab her.

The case has sparked calls for a fresh examination of how sex offenders are monitored after it emerged that McKay had two previous convictions for sex attacks, had been assessed as likely to reoffend and had been under supervision.

The article then goes to explain about assessment and supervision. Red curtain of blood time here:

[Judge] Lord Kinclaven deferred sentence on McKay until July, to obtain a risk assessment report that could lead to a lifelong restriction order, under which McKay would remain in jail until it was deemed safe to release him, and then be monitored stringently in the community.

First: I am so happy that my Constitution forbids upper class twits like this demanding that we refer to them as “Milord”. “Your Honor” is quite bad enough, thenkyewveddymuhch.

Then: Wow, talk about not getting the point.

What about this incident inspires any confidence at all that the Crown has any competence whatsoever in deeming when it is safe to release a rapist?

I love this bit: after being released the last time he raped somebody, the goblin had a “substantial support package”. Off-color jokes aside, what sort of support is being offered to the person McKay regards as his personal sex toy? Here’s an idea: how about a nice little .38 special revolver, training and practice at the police range, and a lifetime supply of ammo? Oh, wait, sorry, she might take it in her head to drive to Dunblane. Besides, as we all know, “A woman lying raped and strangled with her own pantyhose is morally superior to a woman standing over a dead rapist with a smoking gun in her hand.” Never mind.

Please note the crime was not committed with one of those demon-haunted chunks of steel, wood, and plastic that emit eeevill mind-control rays that force ordinary, law-abiding folks to commit acts of violence, but with a knife. I suppose we should be grateful the goblin didn’t use a fire-extinguisher.

Obviously, an adequately stringent support package for the goblin consists of irons or a rope. Not likely, of course, because that kind of harshness might hurt his feelings.

===

Not at all incidentally, that Dunblane link goes to the International Action Network on Small Arms, a group dedicated to dancing in the blood of those who have been rendered defenseless by idiots like themselves. Lord Kinclaven would fit right in:

The anniversary of Dunblane is a time to remember those who were lost in this, the most shocking civilian shooting in Britian’s collective memory, to reevaluate how far we have come to building a safe and secure society, and to consolidate our energy for the battles we still have yet to fight, to ensure that this never happens again.

You thugs, you certainly haven’t built a safe and secure Britain; you’ve ripped it apart. British subjects are helpless, while British yobs grow in boldness. Almost every one of these events happened in places where the victims were forced to depend on the state for protection, and by definition, in every single case, the state failed to protect its victims. The “battles we have yet to fight” is particularly juicy, since the whole point of their organization is to make it impossible to fight any battles. Except, of course, I’m sure they have no plan whatsoever to disarm themselves and their bodyguards, only those of us they would have call them lords.

Good Neighbor

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008

Via Grouchy Old Cripple:

My neighbor is unarmed I promise not to use my gun to defend him


Bad Behavior has blocked 209 access attempts in the last 7 days.