Posts Tagged ‘Pelosi’

“Serious Warning” to Pelosi

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Karl Denninger on the Market Ticker:

There are millions of Americans who are extraordinarily pissed off right now. Some of them, like me, write scathing columns on The Internet or we rant on Talk Radio and Television (such as Judge Napolitano)

But some just smolder. Some remember the other founding document of our Republic, The Declaration of Indpendence, which says, in part:

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

That doesn’t sound so good. What has tempered these people is largely what always has in all nations, that is:

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

Indeed.

Neither you or I know where the line is for that cross-section of the citizens in this land. I cannot speak for them, for I am not inclined toward the sort of actions that they are, nor do I countenance them. As such I’m not exactly on those folks’ “A list”.

In fact I fear the day they decide to express their disgust, for while in singular number those expressions are horrifying, as a group such actions harken to a time I hope we would never revisit in this nation.

But I do understand, and see, that they are seething in anger at what has befallen this once-great country.

They have watched as thirty years of corruption in Washington DC has turned our economy and government into a bad joke.

They have watched their jobs go overseas to a Communist Nation for the benefit of a handful of corporate oligarchs, while Washington chortles.

They have watched banksters do everything in their power to imprison them in debt, including bribing Congress to remove usury laws, “reform” bankruptcy so as to render a significant percentage of the population under effective indentured servitude (allegedly prohibited by the Constitution) while the very same banksters declare bankruptcy at the drop of a hat and stick lenders with losses, and while these very same banksters peddle fraudulent securities, cook their balance sheets and generally defraud everyone in the nation – then force the taxpayers, at gunpoint (quite literally, if you remember the fall of 2008 – you were in the room with Bernanke and Paulson when they threatened tanks in the streets) to bail them out.

But all of this, while it has been outrageous and even criminal, has been, for the most part, Constitutional. It may be the stuff of a Banana Republic, and it may violate equal protection of the law (a founding principle and in fact a guaranteed right), but Congress has never cared about any of that in my 47 years on this planet.

Witness all the laws you, Madame Speaker and the rest of the Government (including this Health Care plan) do not have to obey while the rest of us do under pain of fine or even imprisonment.

What you propose to do now, however, is not Constitutional.

Rather than negotiate, advance and pass something like my four-point plan that would, along with dropping anti-trust protections and ending the practice of preventing reimportation of drugs and devices, attack the problem at the source, you instead are putting forward the Senate’s 2200-page monstrosity.

You are doing so because this bill is not about Health Care at all. It is about revenue, and you know it.

In short, this is just another Washington scam.

But this time you’re going too far, and you’re taking a horrific risk.

You must not, Madame Speaker.

You must instead face this nation and tell the truth.

Oh, I’ve gutted the damning thing. Read it all. I don’t agree with every word — for one thing, it’s not about “revenue”, it’s about control — but Denninger has the tone right, and the warning is fair.

I think it’s clear that the Dem leadership is pushing this against public pressure, knowing that they will lose the next election, because they know that in their brave new world, they will be taken care of, given cushy positions as regulators and lobbyists. They have bet their lives on this, and if it fails, they will lose the next election and be pariahs.

They deserve tar and feathers and very rough rails, but the American people they so despise are probably too decent for that.

Dear God in Heaven, Please Let Everybody Read This And Start Treating Pelosi Accordingly

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Everything She Does Is Cute.

Hm, wonder if it would work on Obama as well?

No, wait! The entire Democratic Party! CNN! Chris Matthews!

/me stares off into Happyland, drooling into my beard.


[update]

And no sooner do I post that, but I run across this from Eric S. Raymond:

Ego is for little people.

Roissy and Raymond are pointing at the same thing, in different ways and for different reasons, but the same thing nevertheless.


I have no idea who Roissy is, but Raymond…

Raymond wrote, amongst many, many other worthy things, two crucial essays, with applications broader than they seem on the surface: The Loginataka, the last stanza of which moves me to tears; and “Ethics From the Barrel of a Gun”, which is what made me understand, at long last, what this was all about.

Nancy Pelosi is Evil! EEEVVVIIILLL! Well, usually. oh, never mind.

Wednesday, July 9th, 2008

I’m not a fan of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-People’s Democracy of Frisco, CA). She’s a commie gun-grabbing terrorist-enabling would-be tyrant, but fortunately she’s also an incompetent weakling. She has led Congress to its lowest approval ratings ever, in the single digits, worse than the Bushitler.

Now, Slashdot points to a story on the righty Chicago Boyz blog featuring her latest attack on our liberty:

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who would like very much to reimpose the old, so-called, “Fairness Doctrine” that once censored conservative opinion on television and radio broadcasting, is scheming to impose rules barring any member of Congress from posting opinions on any internet site without first obtaining prior approval from the Democratic leadership of Congress. No blogs, twitter, online forums – nothing.

The Boyz, prompted by Rep. John Culberson (R-Shitkickers, TX) link to a PDF of the enabling letter from Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Massaidiots), then continue:

Set aside the nakedly partisan aspect of this plan for a moment – on the technological merits alone this may be the goddamn dumbest thing I’ve heard of regarding the Internet coming out of Congress in a long, long time. The dinosaurs who are uncomfortable with computers, the unwashed masses being aware of their actions and free political debate want to turn the clock back to the 1970s. Except during the 1970s no one would have dared to propose controlling what a democratically elected member of Congress could say to their constituents. Doesn’t it register in the Beltway that they are talking about public information that already belongs to the people of the United States? Senators and Congressmen should be interacting with citizens more freely, not less; the U.S. Congress needs radical transparency not greater opacity imposed by the Democratic House leadership to better hide shady dealings

It’s a brazenly Orwellian and most likely unconstitutional power grab by the Speaker of the House unlike anything dreamed of by any previous speaker – not Sam Rayburn, not Joseph Cannon. Nobody.

Oh, delightful! Downright tasty! Too good to be true!

Well, yeah. Too good to be true, indeed.

As many comments point out, both on the CBz site and on Slashdot, the letter appears to say nothing of the kind. In fact, it seems to be aimed at making it easier for Representatives to host official House documents, particularly video, on servers other than the the official House servers. It isn’t aimed at the personal communications of House members, nor at content they generate. The closest this document comes to “prior restraint”, as far as I can tell, is a restriction, “to the maximum extent possible”, on posting official House documents where they “may appear with commercial or political information or any other information not in compliance with the House’s content guidelines.”

[The PDF is a scan of the letter, so I can't cut and paste text, and I'm too lazy to retype it.]

In other words, as I read this, Congresscritters shouldn’t pass off stuff produced in the name of the House at large as being the product of their own offices, or vice-versa. This is not an attempt to restrict the dissemination of “public information that already belongs to the people of the United States”. To the contrary: it’s intended to make that information easier to get to.

C’mon, folks. Pelosi and company really are evil. They do plenty of actual bad stuff. It does us no good at all, and great harm, to make transparently unfounded accusations like this.

That’s stooping to their level, that is. We don’t need to.


The 24-hour rule should be in effect on this story: come back tomorrow, after the dust has settled, and see where things are then. I, personally, am crossing my fingers in the hopes that Pelosi is as evil, and as stupid, as the Boyz make her out to be, and that her fellow ‘Critters boot her out to the street for interfering with their Constitutional right to dispense rabid propaganda to their sheep constituents.

In the meantime, I’m saving the text of this page, and the letter, in case they change or disappear.