Posts Tagged ‘Mohammad’

Mohammed Image Archive

Saturday, May 1st, 2010

Zombie says “South Park is the least of Islam’s problems: The Mohammed Image Archive displays every Mohammed portrait ever created“.

Many of these are from classical sources, many are sympathetic.

Also of interest: the amazing emails and letters from Mohammed’s supporters.

Religion of Peace. Oh, yeah.

Muhammad and Wife

Saturday, April 24th, 2010

Via Ghost of a Flea, a cartoon of the psychopathic cult killer Muhammad and his wife, Aisha. This cartoon was posted around Malmo, Sweden, as a part of a call to halt the growing Islamic influence on Swedish culture. See this article from Islam in Europe. It says the caption on the cartoon reads, “Mohammed with wife, he’s 53, she’s 9. Is this the type of marriage we want to see in Skåne?”

Content warning: Big Mo and Little Aisha are naked in this unappealing and crudely drawn cartoon. If that will offend you for sexual reasons (naked people, including a child), do not click on this link. If, however, it will offend you because you think it is blasphemous, then by all means click the link, see the cartoon, scream in offended fury, and then take a big shit, eat it, recycle, reuse, until until you die.

There is no god, especially not Allah, and Mohammad, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a child-molesting mass murderer.

Probably won’t last, but here’s a link to a French blogger brave enough to post a photograph of the original Malmo poster.

Oh, look, even more photos insulting jihadis, their filthy cult leader, and their flimsy, boring, toy god.

Jesus Incites Violence

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

Oh, wait, no, sorry; that would be Mohammad who incites violence amongst his devout.

Osama bin Laden’s communiqués have also quoted the Koran copiously. In his 1996 “Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places,” he quotes seven Koran verses: 3:145; 47:4-6; 2:154; 9:14; 47:19; 8:72; and the notorious “Verse of the Sword,” 9:5. Bin Laden began his October 6, 2002, letter to the American people with two Koran quotations, both of a martial bent: “Permission to fight (against disbelievers) is given to those (believers) who are fought against, because they have been wronged and surely, Allah is Able to give them (believers) victory” (22:39) and “Those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Taghut (anything worshipped other than Allah e.g. Satan). So fight you against the friends of Satan; ever feeble is indeed the plot of Satan” (4:76).”

One pro-Osama website put it this way: “The truth is that a Muslim who reads the Koran with devotion is determined to reach the battlefield in order to attain the reality of Jihad. It is solely for this reason that the Kufaar [unbelievers] conspire to keep the Muslims far away from understanding the Koran, knowing that Muslims who understand the Koran will not distance themselves from Jihad.”

And yet, Spencer points out, it is not the kufaars, the non-believers, who need to be worried about harassment and, uh, getting killed and stuff. No, no.

Silly me. I thought that after an Islamic jihadist murdered twelve innocent non-Muslims, it would be the non-Muslims who would need reassuring and protecting. But of course that non-existent backlash takes priority over 12 dead unbelievers.

“Some Muslims fear backlash after rampage: In the wake of Fort Hood tragedy, Houston authorities try to assure the faithful steps are being taken to keep followers safe,” by Moises Mendoza and Lindsay Wise for the Houston Chronicle, November 7:

In Houston, government officials have been working to reassure Muslims that they’re safe, pointing out that there have been few cases of retaliation locally after previous attacks involving Muslims.

There have been few cases anywhere. So few that CAIR has had to invent them.

As always, I have to say (just because, so far, anyway, I can, and because it really upsets some people): There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammad, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a child molesting mass-murderer.


Tom Maguire, over at JustOneMinute, points out “Some dots just can’t be connected.” He points to this piece from the New York Post:

What interpretation of Islam influ enced Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan? As often before, the trail leads to the official sect of Saudi Arabia — known as Wahhabism to most of us of who denounce it.

We’ve also learned that, before his transfer to Ft. Hood last year, Hasan served as a psychiatrist at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, DC, and regularly attended Friday prayer at the Muslim Community Center in Silver Spring, Md.

The Silver Spring clerics have issued formal statements condemning the carnage at Ft. Hood. But Imam Faizul Khan, long the main prayer leader at the mosque and a friend of Hasan, said he never believed Hasan capable of such an act.

Yet what docrines did Hasan absorb at the mosque? While he was a communicant, it hosted at least four talks by Enver Masud, the founder of The Wisdom Fund, the main Muslim “truther” group in America [link, link].

And Khan is a leading board member of the Islamic Society of North America — the main Wahhabi-lobby group in the United States, established by Saudi Arabia to impose extremism on American Muslims. ISNA has a long and disgraceful record of promoting radical Islam.

Read the whole thing for the links.

Here’s the problem: it’s cover-ups, misdirection, and denial like the Chronicle engages that will eventually result in exactly the kind of “backlash” they claim to be trying to head off.

The NYPost gets it more right:

Confronting the role of radical Islam here is not Islamophobic, but common sense — and the first response moderate Muslims themselves will have.

“More right”, because the only way to ensure that moderate Muslims confront radical Islam, and pull it out by the roots, is to make America a very uncomfortable place for Muslims generally as part of the aftermath of incidents like Ft. Hood.

Let me point out that I believe the overwhelming majority of American Muslims to be “moderate”, i.e., non-observant or minimally observant, about on par with most American Christians.

However, we absolutely must hold the moderates responsible for the actions of the jihadists sheltering among them.

They should be every bit as afraid as the rest of us should be. Coddling them, and their viper brethren, is close to suicide.

Proof At Last, I’m Converting to Islam Now.

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

Via Pharyngula:
allah-writes
Miracle Baby” story on AOL:

Thousands of Muslims have been traveling to a remote town in a war-torn region of southern Russian hoping to see verses from Islam’s holy book appear on the skin of a “miracle baby.”
The parents of 9-month-old Ali Yakubov said the word “Allah” appeared on his chin soon after his birth, The Sun reported.

Let me say it again, people: There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammad was nobody’s prophet, but a child-raping mass murderer.

Who even today persuades his followers to torture their own children in his evil name.

Mohammad’s Birthday, May Piss Be Upon Him

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

As always: There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammad, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a deranged child-raping mass-murderer.

He did not found Islam as a religion of peace, but as an ideological cult of hatred and violence that aims to control every tiniest aspect of its followers’ lives. His followers, those who have studied and accepted his writings at face value (as opposed to those who have merely adopted the trappings and rituals as a source of comfort and order in their own lives) mean to convert, enslave, or destroy all non-Muslims; the very word “islam” means “submit”. Jews are singled out in his religious writings and sayings as deserving special hatred. Mohammad specifically asserted that Jesus was not the Son of God, but merely another prophet, inferior to himself.

As always, it matters not a lick whether those statements are true or not, although I certainly believe they are true. What matters is that I have the absolute right to make those statements. If you don’t like it, please feel free to say so in my comments.

(Prompted by Rusty, but I note that the actual day of “Mawlid” varies depending on whether you’re a Sunni or Shi’a, and it looks to be a day of “observance”, not the actual anniversary of his birth, the exact date of which seems to be unknown. But frankly, I don’t care. Any opportunity to piss upon the memory of this lunatic killer pleases me.)

[Update]
I am pleased to announce that the above post would be illegal in India:

In his first public function after recovering from cardiac bypass surgery, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today met a group of Muslim girls and used the occasion to assert that no one had the license to “criticise or run down” other religions.
Though Singh’s first official engagement was his meeting with a head of a State of an African country last week, his interaction with the children today was his first public engagement.

Greeting the children on the occasion of Milad-un-Nabi, he said “our Constitution gives full freedom to the people to practice any religion of their choice, but it does not give anyone the license to criticize or run down other religions.” Addressing the students studying in Urdu medium schools in the capital on the occasion of Prophet Mohammed’s birth anniversary, he said the country cannot prosper until women progress and girls were given equal opportunities to study in schools and colleges.

[Emphasis mine.]
[via The Volokh Conspiracy.]

Mind you, he is speaking of a religion which routinely inspires its followers to burn girls’ schools, sometimes with the girls still in them, and which works to see that even boys’ schools teach little but the rote memorization of the Koran.

Although some religious teaching seems to be no impediment — Catholic schools are renowned for the quality of their education — no country has prospered where the schools emphasize religion to the exclusion of verifiable fact.

He is also speaking of the religion which has been unremittingly and violently hostile to Hinduism, India’s majority religion. Note that since Judaism and Christianity are the theological roots of Islam, it allows Christians and Jews to practice their infidel superstitions, as long as they keep quiet about it, don’t build new temples or repair old ones, and pay the special jizya tax; but no such tolerance is granted to Hindus.

Oh, Texas? About emphasizing religion over facts? I’m looking at you, too.

[update 2]
Oren, in a comment at VC, links to the relevant clause in the Indian Constitution. It’s a handful of words outlining the rights — followed by a dense page of exceptions.

Look at how our government manages to pick at the very plainly stated rights given in the Bill of Rights (of course, with a special emphasis on the Second, where “shall not be infringed” has somehow morphed into “except as lawmakers and bureaucrats see fit).

Now imagine what happens when the exceptions have greater weight than the rights themselves.

It’s A Miracle! Despite Mathematical Proof That Allah Exists, I’m Still A Skeptic! Hallelujah!

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

Yes, here’s an irrefutable mathematical proof that Invisible Superherovillain From Outerspace Allah means for me to submit to him.

Irrefutable, of course, for anyone who believes in numerology, or who believes that when you see a horsey in the clouds, it’s because Allah sculpted it as proof of his existence.

I like it that early on, they use “God” instead of “Allah”, and “submission” instead of “Islam”. At first glance, it could be a Christian site.

Via P.Z. Myers at Pharyngula.

Oh, and allow me to re-iterate:

There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammad, may piss be upon him, was a child-molesting mass murderer.

Sammenhold

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

Mohammed teaches that if you display a cartoon making fun of him, Allah, or their followers, it is appropriate, nay, outright holy, to riot, burn cars, and plot the murder of the cartoonist.
Danish cartoon of Mohammed with a bomb as his turban.

So, let me make it clear:

There is no god, not even Allah; and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was a child-molesting mass murderer.

Oh, and you women, yes you, the ones with no clitorises, cowering in your portable black tents, kneeling in the back of the mosque because your prophet is so contemptuous of you that he won’t let you pray up front with the men, why, exactly, does he deserve your worship, or even your respect? Fear, yes, obedience, OK if you choose, but respect? Worship? Anything other than a kick in his holy nuts?

It makes no difference whether any of the above is true or not, or even whether I believe it or not.

What matters is, I have the absolute right to say it, in public, to the widest audience I can reach. You have the right to be offended, and scold me for it. That’s why I have comments enabled.

You do not have the right to prevent me from offending you.

Neither do you do have the right to riot, burn cars, or plot murder over it.

Please do not hesitate to eat pig shit (or A-10 Warthog shit, or JDAMs, or plain old 5.56 NATO, your choice) and die, you ignorant medieval ragheads.

Or, slit the throats of your robber-priests, take a few physics and biology courses, and join us up here in the twenty-first century. For all its problems, the future really is a wonderful place to live, and it’s only getting better.

[Ms. Malkin explains my outburst:]

Two years ago, the Mohammed cartoon conflagration consumed the world and the blogosphere helped lead the way in fighting back. Longtime readers will remember that this site hammered the issue in support of Denmark. “Sammenhold,” you may recall, is the Danish word for solidarity. With the arrests this week of five jihadists accused of plotting to murder one of the Danish cartoonists, it’s time to demonstrate sammenhold again.