Posts Tagged ‘Jihad’

Islam Must Be Destroyed

Sunday, September 11th, 2011

There is no God, especially not Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but the mass murdering, child raping, leader of a fanatic death cult.

Ten years ago today, we saw the fruit of his savage evil. Nothing mundane about it.

There are two kinds of “Muslims”.

There are those who, ignorant of the meaning of their alleged faith, simply go through the motions of their rituals and mouth the platitudes they have been taught. These are the overwhelming majority of any religion, and I have no quarrel with them, although no respect, either.

And there are those who understand and truly believe. Over the last ten years, they have taught us well.

They wage jihad against us. They torture, enslave, and kill all who stand against them. They do not abide any other religion nor any other way of life.

They abhor liberty.

They are our enemies. They must be destroyed, or they will destroy us.

I won’t be spending any time watching CNN, or Fox, or even the History channel today.

I am far more concerned with the war raging right this minute, and they are traitors, openly spreading enemy propaganda.

Right now, jihadis are killing our soldiers (although not as quickly as our soldiers are killing them). Right now, they are beating, enslaving, maiming, and killing their own girls and women. Right now, they are fighting to destroy the nation of Israel, and all who live there. Right now, they are taking control of formerly “secular” states, like Egypt and Turkey, and our traitor press and traitor leaders celebrate this as Spring in the Middle East.

Right now, President Hussein is planning the defeat of the nation who elected him. He is corroding our military, our economy, our morals, our liberty, our spirit.

I have no thought for ten years ago. Right now, the Towers are still falling, and far too many us are cheering.

Right. Damn. Now.

Christian Violence: Tavis Smiley

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

Joe Hicks over at Pajamas Media highlights an interview with Hirsi Ali, who “fled a traditional Muslim life in Somalia, a life that included being the victim of female genital mutilation as a child, and eventually made her way to the Netherlands where she rejected Islam and literally underwent an intellectual awakening. She now lives in America.” Ali is under a death threat fatwa for her work with slain filmmaker Theo Van Gogh on Submission, which exposes Islam’s vile misogyny.

The interviewer was Tavis Smiley of PBS. You can watch the interview here.

It’s also important to know that Hirsi Ali lives under the constant watch of security guards, since her life continues to be threatened by Islamic extremists.

This was the woman who walked onto Tavis Smiley’s PBS show to promote her new book. Nomad calls on key institutions of the West — universities, feminists, and Christian churches — to wage a war of ideas against Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism.

However, Smiley was in no mood to hear Hirsi Ali’s arguments that placed Islam in a bad light. He wanted to assert the old leftist claim that Islam is always and everywhere “a religion of peace.”

Look at this jaw-dropping exchange between Smiley and Hirsi Ali:

Smiley: But Christians do that every single day in this country. …

Ali: Do they blow people up every single day?

Smiley: Yes, Christians. Every day, people walk into post offices, they walk into schools, that’s what Columbine — I mean I could do this all day long. There’s so many more examples of Christians — and I happen to be a Christian — that’s back to this notion of you idealizing Christianity to my read. There’s so many more examples, Ayaan, of Christians who do that than you could ever give me examples of Muslims who have done that inside this country where you live and work.

Beyond the irritating liberal arrogance is the complete ignorance of the facts involved here.
Let’s ignore momentarily the dozens of terror plots — all designed and organized by Muslim-Americans — that have been uncovered and thwarted by this nation’s security forces. I will instead direct Smiley’s attention to these attacks against Americans:

  • 1993: The World Trade Center bombing in New York killed 6 people.
  • 1996: The Khobar Towers bombing killed 20 and wounded 372.
  • 1998: The bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania left 224 dead and 4,000 injured.
  • 2001: On 9/11, 19 hijackers flew planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 perished.
  • 2009: U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan shot and killed 13 at Texas’ Fort Hood.
  • 2010: Faisal Shahzad attempted to detonate a car bomb in Times Square.

Uh, where’s a similar listing of Christian-inspired acts of violence, Mr. Smiley? The sweeping ignorance, or political blindness, of Smiley’s claim that “Christians do that (commit acts of terror) every single day in this country” is nothing short of astounding.

Unlike Islam, Christian scripture does not guarantee paradise to those who kill in the name of their faith. But the Koran does offer the fruits of paradise to “those who kill for Allah.” Suicide bombers have been lured to their deaths with this promise and the offer that they will be free from the fires of hell if they kill an infidel and, in the process, die.

[My emphasis.]

That last, right there, is the key that makes Islam so toxic. Even turn-the-other-cheek, meek-inheriting-the-earth Christianity can be perverted to excuse violence in its name, but Mohammed actively encouraged it, and led Muslim armies against the infidels in his own time.

Nevertheless, let me for a moment be the devil’s advocate.

First, if you want the list of Christian terrorist acts here in America, look up abortion clinic bombings and murders. However, note that these acts are committed not to force the Christian faith on others, but because the anti-abortionists believe that a wholesale murder of innocents is taking place. I happen not to agree with that, although it’s a close call, but if I did, I hope that I too would be doing everything in my power to stop it. Not to terrorize, mind, but to directly disrupt a human slaughterhouse. I hope I’d do the same against guard barracks in Nazi concentration camps or Soviet gulags or, um, Save The Earth re-education camps, should they ever come to pass.

Outside of America, look at Northern Ireland. However, while that conflict has a religious cast to it, the underlying conflict is one for political independence. It’s ugly as hell, and the actions involved are totally unjustified, but it’s not a war of religious expansion.

I’ll also note that both clinic bombings and the Irish fight have died down considerably in recent years. The practitioners have either fallen to attrition, or realized they were not getting the kind of sympathy they hoped for.

Second, although I don’t have a list to hand, I think there have been many nut jobs who do commit horrible crimes in the name of Christianity. Thing is, they are nut jobs, acting in direct contravention of the scriptures they cite, and they do not remotely have the support of mainstream Christian clerics.

Finally, undoubtedly many Christians do commit ordinary crimes, but not in the name of Christ — the Roman Catholic Mafioso is a classic stereotype. However, the attraction of this stereotype in fiction is precisely the huge disconnect between the professed faith and the daily life.

“Uh, how about the Spanish Inquisition? Galileo, dude!” The Inquisition was indeed brutal, but it was only carried out against other Christians, not as a weapon of evangelism against other faiths. And even the Catholic Church eventually realized that the Inquisition was not only against scripture, but counterproductive in practice, actually turning people away from the faith. It forced Western Civilization to grow the hell up.

The Islamic Jihad is the only longstanding and still very much active, program of violence against non-coreligionists, is strongly rooted in scripture, and is endorsed, advocated, and managed by the highest ranks of the Muslim clergy. It spreads an oppressive creed of utter intolerance towards the highest ideals of classical liberal, and even neo-liberal, political ideology. (Except statism. Neo-liberals love them their statism.)

And it is vastly more promiscuously lethal than the anti-abortionists, or even the Irish Republican Army, ever dreamed of being.

Smiley here is covering for evil on the largest scale. He is not hiding Nazis in his attic, he’s openly shilling for them.

He calls himself a Christian, but in fact is calling for the eradication of the faith he claims to serve.

Shame.

Day By Day Insults Peaceful Muslims

Saturday, April 24th, 2010

Oh, this is juicy:
Daybyday-Mohammed042510-w

“High chair.” Lovely.

Oh, yes, you should read the whole thing.

Yes yes, of course, I have an idea for “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day“. My execution will be crappy, if I can get it out at all.

“Why I Did It”, By Hasan

Monday, November 16th, 2009

[I have only briefly glanced at this material as yet; this post is basically a sticky note to myself for future reference.]

The Washington Post puts up the presentation slides for a talk on issues facing Muslims in the U.S. military that Major Nidal Hasan gave to his fellow doctors.

Barry Rubin does a point by point analysis.

How do we know that the attack at Fort Hood was an act of Islamist terrorism? Simple, Major Nidal Hassan told us so. You’ve seen reports of a long list of things he did and said along these lines. But what’s most amazing of all is this:

Hassan is the first terrorist in history to give an academic lecture explaining why he was about to attack. Yet that still isn’t enough for too many people—including the president of the United States–to understand that the murderous assault at Fort Hood was a Jihad attack.

It was reported that the audience was shocked and frightened by his lecture. He was supposed to speak on some medical topic yet instead talked on the topic: “The Koranic World View as it Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military.” All you have to do is look at the 50 Power Point slides and they tell you everything you need to know.

It is quite a good talk. He’s logical and presents his evidence. This is clearly not the work of a mad man or a fool, though there’s still a note of ambiguity in it. He’s still working out what to do in his own mind and is trying to figure out if he has a way out other than in effect deserting the U.S. army and becoming a Jihad warrior. Ultimately, he concluded that he could not be a proper Muslim without killing American soldiers. Obviously, other Muslims could reach different conclusions but Hassan strongly grounds himself in Islamic texts.

In a sense, Hassan’s lecture was a cry for help: Can anyone show me another way out? Can anyone refute my interpretation of Islam? One Muslim in the audience reportedly tried to do so. But unless these issues are openly discussed and debated–rather than swept under the rug–more people will die.

In fact, I’d recommend that teachers use this lecture in teaching classes on both Islam and Islamist politics.

Follow along with me and you’ll understand everything.

So follow along, already. At first glance, his analysis seems thorough. Pro-jihadists, please feel free to respond in similar detail.

“$200 Haircuts on 88-cent Heads”

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Mark Shea, one of many outside the mainstream pointing at the blatantly obvious truth the mainstream insists on not seeing:

One thing you can give our media Chattering Classes: They are utterly consistent. After Major Nidal Malik Hasan opened fire on a roomful of defenseless people in Fort Hood, it was absolutely assured that we would immediately be told that this outrage had nothing to do with his Islamic faith and that it was not an act of terror. Then, as time went on and the bleedin’ obvious became bleedin’ obvious, we would spend all weekend enduring TV pundits scratching the $200 haircuts on their 88-cent heads and pondering the question of whether there might be some remote connection between Islamic belief and a guy who praises Muslim suicide bombers as heroes and martyrs, sits under the teaching of a Radical Islamic imam who praises his act of slaughter as heroic, uses his authority as a psychiatrist to proselytize vulnerable patients with Islamic agitprop, and dresses in traditional Muslim garb and shouts “Allahu akbar!” as he guns down his prey.

It was a spectacular display of deliberate willed stupidity by a media culture that demonstrates repeatedly it does not want to acknowledge that Islam tends to breed such acts of terror with startling frequency. And it was predictable because it happens every time some Islamic butcher opens up on innocent victims in the name of the Prophet.

Well worth your time to read the whole thing.


Shea points at something in particular I’ve been trying to find; more evidence of Hollywood’s cravenness, in particular:

For 2012, Emmerich set his sites on destroying the some biggest landmarks around the world, from Rome to Rio. But there’s one place that Emmerich wanted to demolish but didn’t: the Kaaba, the cube-shaped structure located in the center of Mecca. It’s the focus of prayers and the site of the Hajj, the biggest, most important pilgrimage in Islam.

“Well, I wanted to do that, I have to admit,” the filmmaker told scifiwire.com. “But my co-writer Harald [Kloser] said, ‘I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie.’ And he was right.”

Emmerich went on: “We have to all, in the western world, think about this. You can actually let Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have … a fatwa, and that sounds a little bit like what the state of this world is. So it’s just something which I kind of didn’t [think] was [an] important element, anyway, in the film, so I kind of left it out.”

Traditionally, a fatwa has meant religious opinion by an Islamic scholar or imam. The term has gained currency in the West after Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini issued a death sentence in the form of a fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie for alleged blasphemies in his book “The Satanic Verses” in 1989. As a result, the Indian-born writer was forced into hiding for most of the ’90s.

But noooo, we’re told to believe. “Jihad” just means “a peaceful inner struggle with one’s self”. We’re told, “religion of peace”. We’re told, “selective quotation of scriptures.”

NO. As I always say at this point:

There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was nobody’s prophet, but a child-molesting mass murderer.

And I say that simply because, so far, I can, but I’m beginning to fear the day is coming when I dare not say such things in public.

And when that day comes, you watch: I won’t be able to say that, but anyone will be able to piss on a statue of Christ, or daub the Virgin Mary with shit, and will get public funds to do it.

Witch Hunt

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

This, from comments:

You are calling for a witch hunt.

Yes, yes I am. Darn betcha.

However, what I am calling for is a witchhunt by what I am assured is the vast majority (at least here in America) of moderate Muslims against (what I am again assured is) the tiny minority of jihadist radicals sheltering among them. A few public condemnations of acts like the Ft. Hood murders are not enough. Muslims themselves must destroy this cancer growing in their breast. If they do not, the rest of us will, out of sheer self-defense, and the mastectomy will be radical.

As for “all first hand accounts” — Actually, no, there are many reports of the murderer’s longstanding, and increasing, Islamic fundamentalism over the past several years, including reports of him delivering Jihadist lectures during grand rounds; of him wearing the traditional white robe of a shaheed, a martyr to be; of him handing out copies of the Koran, and even giving away his furniture in the days before the attack. There are several links between mosques he attended and Wahabist clerics in Saudi Arabia. (Once again, yes, I’ve done my damn homework; you do yours. These reports are not at all hard to find.)

I’m sure he was stressed over being sent to the Middle East — but that stress arose from his conflict between his military oath and mission, and his religious fundamentalism.

He chose to betray his oath, his country, and his fellow soldiers. He chose sides, and became the enemy.

That must be stopped, and there only two ways: People like him, and the clerics who encourage them, can be rooted out by other Muslims, or the rest of us can do it for them.

Choose sides. Soon.

===

Related:

Carol Gould’s scolding of Michael Moore for his claim that there really isn’t a significant terrorist threat; it’s chock full of links to the contrary.

===

[update]
Another quick, but highly relevant link:

I believe it was Derb a few months after 9/11 who said that for this new struggle our watchword was “Better screwed than rude.” Major Hasan represents the institutionalization of that attitude. Thirteen people are dead, dozens more will live with their injuries for the rest of their days, and a lot of families have had a great big gaping hole blown out of their lives because of it.

Anwar al-Awlaki and his chums have bet that such a society is too sick to survive. Watch the nothing-to-see-here media driveling on about pre-post-traumatic stress disorder like gibbering lunatics in a padded cell, and then think whether you’d really want to take that bet.

Read the whole thing. Absolutely.

Via Cold Fury.

Hitching Real Truth To Real Power

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

Christopher Hitchens gets beaten up in Lebanon for defacing a political poster, and even P.Z. Meyers over at Pharyngula admits Hitch has got brass.

To their credit, many of P.Z.’s commenters understand what Hitch did. Many don’t get it, though, crediting Hitch with alcohol or stupidty rather than bravery.

I won’t go quote-picking, scan down to get the flavor.

In response, my comment [#90]:

There’s folks who think that “speaking truth to power” means wearing pink and marching in Pelosi’s home district while carrying a sign equating George W. Bush with Hitler, knowing full well that Bush’s goons aren’t going to come after them for it, not then and there, not ever.

Then there’s Hitch, who understands that what it really means is insulting theocratic Nazis on their home turf where they will beat you up right there in the street in broad daylight.

Hitch may be a lot of things, but stupid isn’t on the list. He knew the risks and spoke the truth, and the power beat him up. I dare say that even sober he counted it worth the cost, because it got noticed, even here amongst those who do not understand what liberty and freedom of speech are really about, how precious they are, and what it costs to defend them.

Understand, folks: The religious fanatics who beat up Hitch want to beat up you, too, on your home ground. They want to convert you, enslave you, or destroy you, just like their holy book says they should, and frankly they’d be disappointed if you converted.

All over Europe, all over England, and right next door to the USA in Canada: governments are afraid, pissing their pants afraid, to let people criticize savages like those that beat up Hitch. If enough people do it anyway, liberty lives another day. Sit down, shut up, submit to demands that you speak not against Allah and his Prophet, and liberty dies in your heart.

Stand up for Hitch, right now — or kneel down, press your face to the dirt, and submit to Allah, as loudly as you can. Those are your choices. Pick one. Time’s running out.


There were a lot of comments I wanted to respond to directly, but then my eye was caught by sweet little Autumn, who, though she said some good stuff, started out comment #74 by saying:

[The] comment that the violence against Hitchens “proves that he was courageous and right” is not okay. If I were to scribble “fuck off, nigger” on an Obama poster in almost any inner city in America, I would be justifiably beaten up due to my actions.

[ My emphasis]

Well, no way I can let that pass:

“If you can’t say ‘fuck’, you can’t say ‘Fuck the government!” — St. Lenny the Bruce

I can’t believe how exactly your comment reflects that, and worse, how you seem to think that not being able to do that is a good thing, when the man in power is your man. Do you truly not understand that writing “Fuck Off Nigger” on an Obama poster is exactly the same as a BusHitler protest sign?

If so, I weep for you, child, I weep for us all.

Let me emphasize: I greatly admire P.Z.’s articles on evolution and atheism. His exposure of the great holy cracker brouhaha was excellent and brave.

He even understands that Islamic creationism is just as stupid and bad as Christian creationism.

What he does not understand is that where Christians will complain, loudly, and threaten you with lawsuits if you steal their crackers, Jihadists will kill you for drawing a cartoon of their prophet, or even just quoting their scriptures in a context that shows how violently evil their “prophet” was.

As always, my jihadist mantra:

There is no god, not even Allah, and Muhammad, may piss be upon him, was a child-raping mass murderer.

QotD: “Bombs Are More Precious Than Children”

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

No. Words. I can’t think of much to say about this video, which I found by scrolling down the Mere Rhetoric main page after posting about British dhimmitude. What should be unspeakable speaks for itself.

I do, however, have some things to say about those who think the ideology behind this video can be tolerated.

The video shows the children’s programming produced by Hamas, the enemy that has the ear and sympathy of the American left, the Democratic Party (with the very brave exception of, pardon me while I gag on necessary praise, Hillary Clinton. This is a big part of why she lost the Democratic nomination: too much of a war monger), the media, the UN, and the Lightworker, Our Saviour, The Magic Negro. Here is what Time Magazine thinks Israel must necessarily lose to. Here is what Hamas teaches their children, starting in kindergarten:

[youtube link]
Look at schoolchildren in masks, carrying rifles, spouting hatred, learning they are precious only as martyrs.

Search for the love. Search for the tolerance. Search for the peace.

I don’t think you will find it here.

[Comment on Time's anti-Israel cover moved to its own post.]

Where I Was

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

My radio alarm woke me up with news about some plane having flown into some skyscraper somewhere. New York City, maybe? Whatever. That sort of disaster is just the cost of living in an advanced urban society. It happens. I shut off the radio, got up, got dressed, and drove into work; my home ritual on arising is very abbreviated. As was my habit at the time, when I arrived, I sat in my car in the parking lot reading the newspaper.

Suddenly there was a knock on my window. I looked up at a stranger who said, “Turn on your radio! Something terrible!” and strode away, a man on a mission.

I didn’t get much done that day, or the next, or the next.

I have never forgotten. I have never forgiven. I never will.

There are people out there who want to see me enslaved or destroyed, not because I’m rich or white or American or even free, but because I do not share their superstition about an invisible superhero from outer space who wants me to make war on all who don’t believe in him and who don’t allow the words of his prophet to rule every detail of their lives.

There is no god, not even allah; and mohammed, may piss be upon him, was a psychopathic child molesting mass  murderer. I call down death and destruction on all who would force me and mine to say otherwise.

There is a war on, and it did not start on 11 September 2001. It’s been raging for more than a thousand years, and it is driven by adamant blind ignorance, greed, and misogyny. It is time to put an end to it.

[update]

The Doomed hanging out of the World Trade Center windows on 9/11

The Doomed hanging out of the World Trade Center windows on 9/11

These people all died a few minutes after this picture was taken.

Many more pictures like this came out after the first few days. Press coverage, however, quickly moved to pictures of the building itself. Pictures of people, particularly ones like this, or ones of those who chose to jump rather than burn, were avoided specficially because our Gatekeepers felt it would only fuel outrage.

No shit, Sherlocks, you lying partisan scum. I no longer question your patriotism; I assume you are on the other side.

The Slow Surrender

Sunday, April 27th, 2008

I’ve been watching this happen for several years now. It’s scary as hell, and perhaps the scariest thing about it is, it forbids you to talk about it.

It’s the Jihad on Free Speech.

If you read that, grimaced, and moved to click the Back button to get away from this racist screed, congratulations! You’ve taken the first step to Submission!

If you want to find out how your right to free speech is being eroded by religious fanatics who happen not to be Christians, read Bruce Bawer’s Anatomy of Surrender over at City Journal.

Islam divides the world into two parts. The part governed by sharia, or Islamic law, is called the Dar al-Islam, or House of Submission. Everything else is the Dar al-Harb, or House of War, so called because it will take war—holy war, jihad—to bring it into the House of Submission. Over the centuries, this jihad has taken a variety of forms. Two centuries ago, for instance, Muslim pirates from North Africa captured ships and enslaved their crews, leading the U.S. to fight the Barbary Wars of 1801–05 and 1815. In recent decades, the jihadists’ weapon of choice has usually been the terrorist’s bomb; the use of planes as missiles on 9/11 was a variant of this method.

What has not been widely recognized is that the Ayatollah Khomeini’s 1989 fatwa against Satanic Verses author Salman Rushdie introduced a new kind of jihad. Instead of assaulting Western ships or buildings, Kho­meini took aim at a fundamental Western freedom: freedom of speech. In recent years, other Islamists have joined this crusade, seeking to undermine Western societies’ basic liberties and extend sharia within those societies.

The cultural jihadists have enjoyed disturbing success. Two events in particular—the 2004 assassination in Amsterdam of Theo van Gogh in retaliation for his film about Islam’s oppression of women, and the global wave of riots, murders, and vandalism that followed a Danish newspaper’s 2005 publication of cartoons satirizing Mohammed—have had a massive ripple effect throughout the West. Motivated variously, and doubtless sometimes simultaneously, by fear, misguided sympathy, and multicultural ideology—which teaches us to belittle our freedoms and to genuflect to non-Western cultures, however repressive—people at every level of Western society, but especially elites, have allowed concerns about what fundamentalist Muslims will feel, think, or do to influence their actions and expressions. These Westerners have begun, in other words, to internalize the strictures of sharia, and thus implicitly to accept the deferential status of dhimmis—infidels living in Muslim societies.

Call it a cultural surrender. The House of War is slowly—or not so slowly, in Europe’s case—being absorbed into the House of Submission.

The Western media are in the driver’s seat on this road to sharia. Often their approach is to argue that we’re the bad guys.

Oh, yes. Read the whole, ugly, sordid, thing. You need to know.

It’s long and detailed, but here’s the nut:

Britain’s Foreign Office has since deemed even [the phrase "War on Terror"] offensive and banned its use by cabinet members (along with “Islamic extremism”). In January, the Home Office decided that Islamic terrorism would henceforth be described as “anti-Islamic activity.”

Oh, that’s lovely. Brilliant. Note how that makes it impossible to fix responsibility for jihadist terrorism where it belongs. Anyone committing such an act is automatically considered separate from Islam–which therefor cannot be blamed for incitement.

In Britain, “Asian” is the accepted codeword for “Muslim”. In Europe, Muslim rioters are “disaffected youths”. Thus is the language debased, and made to hide the truth rather than reveal it.

Can’t be said often enough:

There is no God, especially not Allah; and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a child-molesting mass murderer. Islam is no “Religion of Peace”, but a violent warrior cult specially designed to enforce ignorance and hatred of everything other than itself.