Posts Tagged ‘Islam’

Islam Must Be Destroyed

Sunday, September 11th, 2011

There is no God, especially not Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but the mass murdering, child raping, leader of a fanatic death cult.

Ten years ago today, we saw the fruit of his savage evil. Nothing mundane about it.

There are two kinds of “Muslims”.

There are those who, ignorant of the meaning of their alleged faith, simply go through the motions of their rituals and mouth the platitudes they have been taught. These are the overwhelming majority of any religion, and I have no quarrel with them, although no respect, either.

And there are those who understand and truly believe. Over the last ten years, they have taught us well.

They wage jihad against us. They torture, enslave, and kill all who stand against them. They do not abide any other religion nor any other way of life.

They abhor liberty.

They are our enemies. They must be destroyed, or they will destroy us.

I won’t be spending any time watching CNN, or Fox, or even the History channel today.

I am far more concerned with the war raging right this minute, and they are traitors, openly spreading enemy propaganda.

Right now, jihadis are killing our soldiers (although not as quickly as our soldiers are killing them). Right now, they are beating, enslaving, maiming, and killing their own girls and women. Right now, they are fighting to destroy the nation of Israel, and all who live there. Right now, they are taking control of formerly “secular” states, like Egypt and Turkey, and our traitor press and traitor leaders celebrate this as Spring in the Middle East.

Right now, President Hussein is planning the defeat of the nation who elected him. He is corroding our military, our economy, our morals, our liberty, our spirit.

I have no thought for ten years ago. Right now, the Towers are still falling, and far too many us are cheering.

Right. Damn. Now.

Christian Violence: Tavis Smiley

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

Joe Hicks over at Pajamas Media highlights an interview with Hirsi Ali, who “fled a traditional Muslim life in Somalia, a life that included being the victim of female genital mutilation as a child, and eventually made her way to the Netherlands where she rejected Islam and literally underwent an intellectual awakening. She now lives in America.” Ali is under a death threat fatwa for her work with slain filmmaker Theo Van Gogh on Submission, which exposes Islam’s vile misogyny.

The interviewer was Tavis Smiley of PBS. You can watch the interview here.

It’s also important to know that Hirsi Ali lives under the constant watch of security guards, since her life continues to be threatened by Islamic extremists.

This was the woman who walked onto Tavis Smiley’s PBS show to promote her new book. Nomad calls on key institutions of the West — universities, feminists, and Christian churches — to wage a war of ideas against Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism.

However, Smiley was in no mood to hear Hirsi Ali’s arguments that placed Islam in a bad light. He wanted to assert the old leftist claim that Islam is always and everywhere “a religion of peace.”

Look at this jaw-dropping exchange between Smiley and Hirsi Ali:

Smiley: But Christians do that every single day in this country. …

Ali: Do they blow people up every single day?

Smiley: Yes, Christians. Every day, people walk into post offices, they walk into schools, that’s what Columbine — I mean I could do this all day long. There’s so many more examples of Christians — and I happen to be a Christian — that’s back to this notion of you idealizing Christianity to my read. There’s so many more examples, Ayaan, of Christians who do that than you could ever give me examples of Muslims who have done that inside this country where you live and work.

Beyond the irritating liberal arrogance is the complete ignorance of the facts involved here.
Let’s ignore momentarily the dozens of terror plots — all designed and organized by Muslim-Americans — that have been uncovered and thwarted by this nation’s security forces. I will instead direct Smiley’s attention to these attacks against Americans:

  • 1993: The World Trade Center bombing in New York killed 6 people.
  • 1996: The Khobar Towers bombing killed 20 and wounded 372.
  • 1998: The bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania left 224 dead and 4,000 injured.
  • 2001: On 9/11, 19 hijackers flew planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 perished.
  • 2009: U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan shot and killed 13 at Texas’ Fort Hood.
  • 2010: Faisal Shahzad attempted to detonate a car bomb in Times Square.

Uh, where’s a similar listing of Christian-inspired acts of violence, Mr. Smiley? The sweeping ignorance, or political blindness, of Smiley’s claim that “Christians do that (commit acts of terror) every single day in this country” is nothing short of astounding.

Unlike Islam, Christian scripture does not guarantee paradise to those who kill in the name of their faith. But the Koran does offer the fruits of paradise to “those who kill for Allah.” Suicide bombers have been lured to their deaths with this promise and the offer that they will be free from the fires of hell if they kill an infidel and, in the process, die.

[My emphasis.]

That last, right there, is the key that makes Islam so toxic. Even turn-the-other-cheek, meek-inheriting-the-earth Christianity can be perverted to excuse violence in its name, but Mohammed actively encouraged it, and led Muslim armies against the infidels in his own time.

Nevertheless, let me for a moment be the devil’s advocate.

First, if you want the list of Christian terrorist acts here in America, look up abortion clinic bombings and murders. However, note that these acts are committed not to force the Christian faith on others, but because the anti-abortionists believe that a wholesale murder of innocents is taking place. I happen not to agree with that, although it’s a close call, but if I did, I hope that I too would be doing everything in my power to stop it. Not to terrorize, mind, but to directly disrupt a human slaughterhouse. I hope I’d do the same against guard barracks in Nazi concentration camps or Soviet gulags or, um, Save The Earth re-education camps, should they ever come to pass.

Outside of America, look at Northern Ireland. However, while that conflict has a religious cast to it, the underlying conflict is one for political independence. It’s ugly as hell, and the actions involved are totally unjustified, but it’s not a war of religious expansion.

I’ll also note that both clinic bombings and the Irish fight have died down considerably in recent years. The practitioners have either fallen to attrition, or realized they were not getting the kind of sympathy they hoped for.

Second, although I don’t have a list to hand, I think there have been many nut jobs who do commit horrible crimes in the name of Christianity. Thing is, they are nut jobs, acting in direct contravention of the scriptures they cite, and they do not remotely have the support of mainstream Christian clerics.

Finally, undoubtedly many Christians do commit ordinary crimes, but not in the name of Christ — the Roman Catholic Mafioso is a classic stereotype. However, the attraction of this stereotype in fiction is precisely the huge disconnect between the professed faith and the daily life.

“Uh, how about the Spanish Inquisition? Galileo, dude!” The Inquisition was indeed brutal, but it was only carried out against other Christians, not as a weapon of evangelism against other faiths. And even the Catholic Church eventually realized that the Inquisition was not only against scripture, but counterproductive in practice, actually turning people away from the faith. It forced Western Civilization to grow the hell up.

The Islamic Jihad is the only longstanding and still very much active, program of violence against non-coreligionists, is strongly rooted in scripture, and is endorsed, advocated, and managed by the highest ranks of the Muslim clergy. It spreads an oppressive creed of utter intolerance towards the highest ideals of classical liberal, and even neo-liberal, political ideology. (Except statism. Neo-liberals love them their statism.)

And it is vastly more promiscuously lethal than the anti-abortionists, or even the Irish Republican Army, ever dreamed of being.

Smiley here is covering for evil on the largest scale. He is not hiding Nazis in his attic, he’s openly shilling for them.

He calls himself a Christian, but in fact is calling for the eradication of the faith he claims to serve.

Shame.

An Actual Offended (Male) Feminist

Sunday, May 9th, 2010

He’s a day late for Offend A Feminist Week, but P.Z. Meyer of Pharyngula is indeed offended, and, as miraculous as Jesus Toast, he’s offended in the right way at the right sort of thing:

An Islamist rebel administration in Somalia has had a 13-year-old girl stoned to death for adultery after the child’s father reported that she was raped by three men.

O.K. I’m just going to try to get my head around this.

[Deep Breath]

Thirteen year old girl gets gang raped by three men, and is then punished for her wanton seduction of those good Allah-fearing gentlemen by being stoned to death. I’m sure the world is a cleaner place without her in it, right? Um, let me think for a moment….

No.

OK then. Moving on to Meyer’s response to the question of, can he, “as a godless humanist, say that this is wrong?”

Yes, I’m sure I can. It is morally reprehensible, it is not fair or just, it does great harm not just to the victim but to the people who perpetrate such hateful acts, and to the rapists who are granted freedom to destroy more lives. The culture that would tolerate and encourage such behavior is not one I want to be a member of, and not even one that I want to share the planet with.

It is very hard to think about it purely rationally, though, when all you can feel is grief for a lost life and so many minds destroyed by hatred.

Right on, P.Z. Right on. Good call.

As I always say at around this point in the conversation:
There is no god, especially not Allah, and Mohammad, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a child molesting, mass murdering, cultist.

[NB: This is a fairly old story, and I'm sure if P.Z. looked around, he could probably find more current examples, but damn it, right is right, and evil is evil. Prove to me that Islam in general, and Somalia in particular, is struggling mightily to cleanse itself of this kind of barbarity, and I'll think about admitting them to the 21st Century World of the Future.]

Day By Day Insults Peaceful Muslims

Saturday, April 24th, 2010

Oh, this is juicy:
Daybyday-Mohammed042510-w

“High chair.” Lovely.

Oh, yes, you should read the whole thing.

Yes yes, of course, I have an idea for “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day“. My execution will be crappy, if I can get it out at all.

Islam: Religion of Pieces

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Trencherbone provides a study guide into how Islam and the Koran works. Dozens of links, organized alphabetically by topic, to other articles extensively quoting the Koran. I’m posting the link because it’s not a quick read; this deserves long, careful study.

This is Islam in its own words, folks, and it’s nasty, violent, toxic filth.

I am a kaffir, an unbeliever, and damn proud of it.

There is no god, particularly not Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, is no prophet, but a child raping, psychotic, mass murderer.

Explain Islam To Us

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

Thomas Friedman, writing in the New York Times:

Whenever something like Fort Hood happens you say, ‘This is not Islam.’ I believe that. But you keep telling us what Islam isn’t. You need to tell us what it is and show us how its positive interpretations are being promoted in your schools and mosques. If this is not Islam, then why is it that a million Muslims will pour into the streets to protest Danish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, but not one will take to the streets to protest Muslim suicide bombers who blow up other Muslims, real people, created in the image of God? You need to explain that to us — and to yourselves.

[Bold mine.]

This is the closer on an excellent essay about the Fort Hood killer, Major Hasan, and “The Narrative” that inspired his act of religious war. Read the whole thing.

“Why I Did It”, By Hasan

Monday, November 16th, 2009

[I have only briefly glanced at this material as yet; this post is basically a sticky note to myself for future reference.]

The Washington Post puts up the presentation slides for a talk on issues facing Muslims in the U.S. military that Major Nidal Hasan gave to his fellow doctors.

Barry Rubin does a point by point analysis.

How do we know that the attack at Fort Hood was an act of Islamist terrorism? Simple, Major Nidal Hassan told us so. You’ve seen reports of a long list of things he did and said along these lines. But what’s most amazing of all is this:

Hassan is the first terrorist in history to give an academic lecture explaining why he was about to attack. Yet that still isn’t enough for too many people—including the president of the United States–to understand that the murderous assault at Fort Hood was a Jihad attack.

It was reported that the audience was shocked and frightened by his lecture. He was supposed to speak on some medical topic yet instead talked on the topic: “The Koranic World View as it Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military.” All you have to do is look at the 50 Power Point slides and they tell you everything you need to know.

It is quite a good talk. He’s logical and presents his evidence. This is clearly not the work of a mad man or a fool, though there’s still a note of ambiguity in it. He’s still working out what to do in his own mind and is trying to figure out if he has a way out other than in effect deserting the U.S. army and becoming a Jihad warrior. Ultimately, he concluded that he could not be a proper Muslim without killing American soldiers. Obviously, other Muslims could reach different conclusions but Hassan strongly grounds himself in Islamic texts.

In a sense, Hassan’s lecture was a cry for help: Can anyone show me another way out? Can anyone refute my interpretation of Islam? One Muslim in the audience reportedly tried to do so. But unless these issues are openly discussed and debated–rather than swept under the rug–more people will die.

In fact, I’d recommend that teachers use this lecture in teaching classes on both Islam and Islamist politics.

Follow along with me and you’ll understand everything.

So follow along, already. At first glance, his analysis seems thorough. Pro-jihadists, please feel free to respond in similar detail.

“$200 Haircuts on 88-cent Heads”

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Mark Shea, one of many outside the mainstream pointing at the blatantly obvious truth the mainstream insists on not seeing:

One thing you can give our media Chattering Classes: They are utterly consistent. After Major Nidal Malik Hasan opened fire on a roomful of defenseless people in Fort Hood, it was absolutely assured that we would immediately be told that this outrage had nothing to do with his Islamic faith and that it was not an act of terror. Then, as time went on and the bleedin’ obvious became bleedin’ obvious, we would spend all weekend enduring TV pundits scratching the $200 haircuts on their 88-cent heads and pondering the question of whether there might be some remote connection between Islamic belief and a guy who praises Muslim suicide bombers as heroes and martyrs, sits under the teaching of a Radical Islamic imam who praises his act of slaughter as heroic, uses his authority as a psychiatrist to proselytize vulnerable patients with Islamic agitprop, and dresses in traditional Muslim garb and shouts “Allahu akbar!” as he guns down his prey.

It was a spectacular display of deliberate willed stupidity by a media culture that demonstrates repeatedly it does not want to acknowledge that Islam tends to breed such acts of terror with startling frequency. And it was predictable because it happens every time some Islamic butcher opens up on innocent victims in the name of the Prophet.

Well worth your time to read the whole thing.


Shea points at something in particular I’ve been trying to find; more evidence of Hollywood’s cravenness, in particular:

For 2012, Emmerich set his sites on destroying the some biggest landmarks around the world, from Rome to Rio. But there’s one place that Emmerich wanted to demolish but didn’t: the Kaaba, the cube-shaped structure located in the center of Mecca. It’s the focus of prayers and the site of the Hajj, the biggest, most important pilgrimage in Islam.

“Well, I wanted to do that, I have to admit,” the filmmaker told scifiwire.com. “But my co-writer Harald [Kloser] said, ‘I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie.’ And he was right.”

Emmerich went on: “We have to all, in the western world, think about this. You can actually let Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have … a fatwa, and that sounds a little bit like what the state of this world is. So it’s just something which I kind of didn’t [think] was [an] important element, anyway, in the film, so I kind of left it out.”

Traditionally, a fatwa has meant religious opinion by an Islamic scholar or imam. The term has gained currency in the West after Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini issued a death sentence in the form of a fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie for alleged blasphemies in his book “The Satanic Verses” in 1989. As a result, the Indian-born writer was forced into hiding for most of the ’90s.

But noooo, we’re told to believe. “Jihad” just means “a peaceful inner struggle with one’s self”. We’re told, “religion of peace”. We’re told, “selective quotation of scriptures.”

NO. As I always say at this point:

There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was nobody’s prophet, but a child-molesting mass murderer.

And I say that simply because, so far, I can, but I’m beginning to fear the day is coming when I dare not say such things in public.

And when that day comes, you watch: I won’t be able to say that, but anyone will be able to piss on a statue of Christ, or daub the Virgin Mary with shit, and will get public funds to do it.

Jesus Incites Violence

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

Oh, wait, no, sorry; that would be Mohammad who incites violence amongst his devout.

Osama bin Laden’s communiqués have also quoted the Koran copiously. In his 1996 “Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places,” he quotes seven Koran verses: 3:145; 47:4-6; 2:154; 9:14; 47:19; 8:72; and the notorious “Verse of the Sword,” 9:5. Bin Laden began his October 6, 2002, letter to the American people with two Koran quotations, both of a martial bent: “Permission to fight (against disbelievers) is given to those (believers) who are fought against, because they have been wronged and surely, Allah is Able to give them (believers) victory” (22:39) and “Those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Taghut (anything worshipped other than Allah e.g. Satan). So fight you against the friends of Satan; ever feeble is indeed the plot of Satan” (4:76).”

One pro-Osama website put it this way: “The truth is that a Muslim who reads the Koran with devotion is determined to reach the battlefield in order to attain the reality of Jihad. It is solely for this reason that the Kufaar [unbelievers] conspire to keep the Muslims far away from understanding the Koran, knowing that Muslims who understand the Koran will not distance themselves from Jihad.”

And yet, Spencer points out, it is not the kufaars, the non-believers, who need to be worried about harassment and, uh, getting killed and stuff. No, no.

Silly me. I thought that after an Islamic jihadist murdered twelve innocent non-Muslims, it would be the non-Muslims who would need reassuring and protecting. But of course that non-existent backlash takes priority over 12 dead unbelievers.

“Some Muslims fear backlash after rampage: In the wake of Fort Hood tragedy, Houston authorities try to assure the faithful steps are being taken to keep followers safe,” by Moises Mendoza and Lindsay Wise for the Houston Chronicle, November 7:

In Houston, government officials have been working to reassure Muslims that they’re safe, pointing out that there have been few cases of retaliation locally after previous attacks involving Muslims.

There have been few cases anywhere. So few that CAIR has had to invent them.

As always, I have to say (just because, so far, anyway, I can, and because it really upsets some people): There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammad, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a child molesting mass-murderer.


Tom Maguire, over at JustOneMinute, points out “Some dots just can’t be connected.” He points to this piece from the New York Post:

What interpretation of Islam influ enced Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan? As often before, the trail leads to the official sect of Saudi Arabia — known as Wahhabism to most of us of who denounce it.

We’ve also learned that, before his transfer to Ft. Hood last year, Hasan served as a psychiatrist at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, DC, and regularly attended Friday prayer at the Muslim Community Center in Silver Spring, Md.

The Silver Spring clerics have issued formal statements condemning the carnage at Ft. Hood. But Imam Faizul Khan, long the main prayer leader at the mosque and a friend of Hasan, said he never believed Hasan capable of such an act.

Yet what docrines did Hasan absorb at the mosque? While he was a communicant, it hosted at least four talks by Enver Masud, the founder of The Wisdom Fund, the main Muslim “truther” group in America [link, link].

And Khan is a leading board member of the Islamic Society of North America — the main Wahhabi-lobby group in the United States, established by Saudi Arabia to impose extremism on American Muslims. ISNA has a long and disgraceful record of promoting radical Islam.

Read the whole thing for the links.

Here’s the problem: it’s cover-ups, misdirection, and denial like the Chronicle engages that will eventually result in exactly the kind of “backlash” they claim to be trying to head off.

The NYPost gets it more right:

Confronting the role of radical Islam here is not Islamophobic, but common sense — and the first response moderate Muslims themselves will have.

“More right”, because the only way to ensure that moderate Muslims confront radical Islam, and pull it out by the roots, is to make America a very uncomfortable place for Muslims generally as part of the aftermath of incidents like Ft. Hood.

Let me point out that I believe the overwhelming majority of American Muslims to be “moderate”, i.e., non-observant or minimally observant, about on par with most American Christians.

However, we absolutely must hold the moderates responsible for the actions of the jihadists sheltering among them.

They should be every bit as afraid as the rest of us should be. Coddling them, and their viper brethren, is close to suicide.

Islamic Water

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

This [Youtube video] has got to be seen to be believed. Scientists exposed water to Islamic scriptures, and obtained “beautiful crystals”. This “microscopically confirmed islam is the correct religion.”
islamicwater450

Praise Allah! Peace be upon Him! Islamic water forms beautiful, intricate, six-sided crystals!

Also known as “snowflakes”, you ignorant desert bandits. You should visit the poles, where there’s plenty of snow to embrace.

Oh, and you should probably capitalize the name of your religion, or the very rocks and trees will cry out, “There is an illiterate terrorist hiding behind me! Come and kill him!”

As always:

There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a child-molesting mass murder.

I await the opportunity to embrace my fatwah, damn it.

Tip of the ski mask to Ghost of a Flea.