Posts Tagged ‘Islam’

« Older Entries

Islam: Religion of Pieces

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Trencherbone provides a study guide into how Islam and the Koran works. Dozens of links, organized alphabetically by topic, to other articles extensively quoting the Koran. I’m posting the link because it’s not a quick read; this deserves long, careful study.

This is Islam in its own words, folks, and it’s nasty, violent, toxic filth.

I am a kaffir, an unbeliever, and damn proud of it.

There is no god, particularly not Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, is no prophet, but a child raping, psychotic, mass murderer.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Islam, Religion and Superstition, War on Jihad | 1 Comment »

Explain Islam To Us

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

Thomas Friedman, writing in the New York Times:

Whenever something like Fort Hood happens you say, ‘This is not Islam.’ I believe that. But you keep telling us what Islam isn’t. You need to tell us what it is and show us how its positive interpretations are being promoted in your schools and mosques. If this is not Islam, then why is it that a million Muslims will pour into the streets to protest Danish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, but not one will take to the streets to protest Muslim suicide bombers who blow up other Muslims, real people, created in the image of God? You need to explain that to us — and to yourselves.

[Bold mine.]

This is the closer on an excellent essay about the Fort Hood killer, Major Hasan, and “The Narrative” that inspired his act of religious war. Read the whole thing.

Tags: ,
Posted in Dhimmis, Fighting Back, Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness | Comments Off

“Why I Did It”, By Hasan

Monday, November 16th, 2009

[I have only briefly glanced at this material as yet; this post is basically a sticky note to myself for future reference.]

The Washington Post puts up the presentation slides for a talk on issues facing Muslims in the U.S. military that Major Nidal Hasan gave to his fellow doctors.

Barry Rubin does a point by point analysis.

How do we know that the attack at Fort Hood was an act of Islamist terrorism? Simple, Major Nidal Hassan told us so. You’ve seen reports of a long list of things he did and said along these lines. But what’s most amazing of all is this:

Hassan is the first terrorist in history to give an academic lecture explaining why he was about to attack. Yet that still isn’t enough for too many people—including the president of the United States–to understand that the murderous assault at Fort Hood was a Jihad attack.

It was reported that the audience was shocked and frightened by his lecture. He was supposed to speak on some medical topic yet instead talked on the topic: “The Koranic World View as it Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military.” All you have to do is look at the 50 Power Point slides and they tell you everything you need to know.

It is quite a good talk. He’s logical and presents his evidence. This is clearly not the work of a mad man or a fool, though there’s still a note of ambiguity in it. He’s still working out what to do in his own mind and is trying to figure out if he has a way out other than in effect deserting the U.S. army and becoming a Jihad warrior. Ultimately, he concluded that he could not be a proper Muslim without killing American soldiers. Obviously, other Muslims could reach different conclusions but Hassan strongly grounds himself in Islamic texts.

In a sense, Hassan’s lecture was a cry for help: Can anyone show me another way out? Can anyone refute my interpretation of Islam? One Muslim in the audience reportedly tried to do so. But unless these issues are openly discussed and debated–rather than swept under the rug–more people will die.

In fact, I’d recommend that teachers use this lecture in teaching classes on both Islam and Islamist politics.

Follow along with me and you’ll understand everything.

So follow along, already. At first glance, his analysis seems thorough. Pro-jihadists, please feel free to respond in similar detail.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Dammit!, Dr. Evil, Government Idiocy, Islam, Jihad, Military | Comments Off

“$200 Haircuts on 88-cent Heads”

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Mark Shea, one of many outside the mainstream pointing at the blatantly obvious truth the mainstream insists on not seeing:

One thing you can give our media Chattering Classes: They are utterly consistent. After Major Nidal Malik Hasan opened fire on a roomful of defenseless people in Fort Hood, it was absolutely assured that we would immediately be told that this outrage had nothing to do with his Islamic faith and that it was not an act of terror. Then, as time went on and the bleedin’ obvious became bleedin’ obvious, we would spend all weekend enduring TV pundits scratching the $200 haircuts on their 88-cent heads and pondering the question of whether there might be some remote connection between Islamic belief and a guy who praises Muslim suicide bombers as heroes and martyrs, sits under the teaching of a Radical Islamic imam who praises his act of slaughter as heroic, uses his authority as a psychiatrist to proselytize vulnerable patients with Islamic agitprop, and dresses in traditional Muslim garb and shouts “Allahu akbar!” as he guns down his prey.

It was a spectacular display of deliberate willed stupidity by a media culture that demonstrates repeatedly it does not want to acknowledge that Islam tends to breed such acts of terror with startling frequency. And it was predictable because it happens every time some Islamic butcher opens up on innocent victims in the name of the Prophet.

Well worth your time to read the whole thing.

Shea points at something in particular I’ve been trying to find; more evidence of Hollywood’s cravenness, in particular:

For 2012, Emmerich set his sites on destroying the some biggest landmarks around the world, from Rome to Rio. But there’s one place that Emmerich wanted to demolish but didn’t: the Kaaba, the cube-shaped structure located in the center of Mecca. It’s the focus of prayers and the site of the Hajj, the biggest, most important pilgrimage in Islam.

“Well, I wanted to do that, I have to admit,” the filmmaker told scifiwire.com. “But my co-writer Harald [Kloser] said, ‘I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie.’ And he was right.”

Emmerich went on: “We have to all, in the western world, think about this. You can actually let Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have … a fatwa, and that sounds a little bit like what the state of this world is. So it’s just something which I kind of didn’t [think] was [an] important element, anyway, in the film, so I kind of left it out.”

Traditionally, a fatwa has meant religious opinion by an Islamic scholar or imam. The term has gained currency in the West after Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini issued a death sentence in the form of a fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie for alleged blasphemies in his book “The Satanic Verses” in 1989. As a result, the Indian-born writer was forced into hiding for most of the ’90s.

But noooo, we’re told to believe. “Jihad” just means “a peaceful inner struggle with one’s self”. We’re told, “religion of peace”. We’re told, “selective quotation of scriptures.”

NO. As I always say at this point:

There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was nobody’s prophet, but a child-molesting mass murderer.

And I say that simply because, so far, I can, but I’m beginning to fear the day is coming when I dare not say such things in public.

And when that day comes, you watch: I won’t be able to say that, but anyone will be able to piss on a statue of Christ, or daub the Virgin Mary with shit, and will get public funds to do it.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Bill of Rights, Dammit!, Dhimmis, Fort Hood, Islam, Jihad, Liberals, Media, News Media, War on Jihad | 6 Comments »

Jesus Incites Violence

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

Oh, wait, no, sorry; that would be Mohammad who incites violence amongst his devout.

Osama bin Laden’s communiqués have also quoted the Koran copiously. In his 1996 “Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places,” he quotes seven Koran verses: 3:145; 47:4-6; 2:154; 9:14; 47:19; 8:72; and the notorious “Verse of the Sword,” 9:5. Bin Laden began his October 6, 2002, letter to the American people with two Koran quotations, both of a martial bent: “Permission to fight (against disbelievers) is given to those (believers) who are fought against, because they have been wronged and surely, Allah is Able to give them (believers) victory” (22:39) and “Those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Taghut (anything worshipped other than Allah e.g. Satan). So fight you against the friends of Satan; ever feeble is indeed the plot of Satan” (4:76).”
…
One pro-Osama website put it this way: “The truth is that a Muslim who reads the Koran with devotion is determined to reach the battlefield in order to attain the reality of Jihad. It is solely for this reason that the Kufaar [unbelievers] conspire to keep the Muslims far away from understanding the Koran, knowing that Muslims who understand the Koran will not distance themselves from Jihad.”

And yet, Spencer points out, it is not the kufaars, the non-believers, who need to be worried about harassment and, uh, getting killed and stuff. No, no.

Silly me. I thought that after an Islamic jihadist murdered twelve innocent non-Muslims, it would be the non-Muslims who would need reassuring and protecting. But of course that non-existent backlash takes priority over 12 dead unbelievers.

“Some Muslims fear backlash after rampage: In the wake of Fort Hood tragedy, Houston authorities try to assure the faithful steps are being taken to keep followers safe,” by Moises Mendoza and Lindsay Wise for the Houston Chronicle, November 7:

In Houston, government officials have been working to reassure Muslims that they’re safe, pointing out that there have been few cases of retaliation locally after previous attacks involving Muslims.

There have been few cases anywhere. So few that CAIR has had to invent them.

As always, I have to say (just because, so far, anyway, I can, and because it really upsets some people): There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammad, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a child molesting mass-murderer.

Tom Maguire, over at JustOneMinute, points out “Some dots just can’t be connected.” He points to this piece from the New York Post:

What interpretation of Islam influ enced Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan? As often before, the trail leads to the official sect of Saudi Arabia — known as Wahhabism to most of us of who denounce it.
…
We’ve also learned that, before his transfer to Ft. Hood last year, Hasan served as a psychiatrist at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, DC, and regularly attended Friday prayer at the Muslim Community Center in Silver Spring, Md.

The Silver Spring clerics have issued formal statements condemning the carnage at Ft. Hood. But Imam Faizul Khan, long the main prayer leader at the mosque and a friend of Hasan, said he never believed Hasan capable of such an act.

Yet what docrines did Hasan absorb at the mosque? While he was a communicant, it hosted at least four talks by Enver Masud, the founder of The Wisdom Fund, the main Muslim “truther” group in America [link, link].

And Khan is a leading board member of the Islamic Society of North America — the main Wahhabi-lobby group in the United States, established by Saudi Arabia to impose extremism on American Muslims. ISNA has a long and disgraceful record of promoting radical Islam.

Read the whole thing for the links.

Here’s the problem: it’s cover-ups, misdirection, and denial like the Chronicle engages that will eventually result in exactly the kind of “backlash” they claim to be trying to head off.

The NYPost gets it more right:

Confronting the role of radical Islam here is not Islamophobic, but common sense — and the first response moderate Muslims themselves will have.

“More right”, because the only way to ensure that moderate Muslims confront radical Islam, and pull it out by the roots, is to make America a very uncomfortable place for Muslims generally as part of the aftermath of incidents like Ft. Hood.

Let me point out that I believe the overwhelming majority of American Muslims to be “moderate”, i.e., non-observant or minimally observant, about on par with most American Christians.

However, we absolutely must hold the moderates responsible for the actions of the jihadists sheltering among them.

They should be every bit as afraid as the rest of us should be. Coddling them, and their viper brethren, is close to suicide.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Bill of Rights, Dhimmis, Fighting Back, Government Idiocy, History, Islam, Jihad, News Media, Political Correctness, Religion and Superstition | 1 Comment »

Islamic Water

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

This [Youtube video] has got to be seen to be believed. Scientists exposed water to Islamic scriptures, and obtained “beautiful crystals”. This “microscopically confirmed islam is the correct religion.”
islamicwater450

Praise Allah! Peace be upon Him! Islamic water forms beautiful, intricate, six-sided crystals!

Also known as “snowflakes”, you ignorant desert bandits. You should visit the poles, where there’s plenty of snow to embrace.

Oh, and you should probably capitalize the name of your religion, or the very rocks and trees will cry out, “There is an illiterate terrorist hiding behind me! Come and kill him!”

As always:

There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a child-molesting mass murder.

I await the opportunity to embrace my fatwah, damn it.

Tip of the ski mask to Ghost of a Flea.

Tags: ,
Posted in Jihad, Laugh Dammit!, Religion and Superstition, Science, Throwing Out the Trash | 4 Comments »

Mohammad’s Birthday, May Piss Be Upon Him

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

As always: There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammad, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a deranged child-raping mass-murderer.

He did not found Islam as a religion of peace, but as an ideological cult of hatred and violence that aims to control every tiniest aspect of its followers’ lives. His followers, those who have studied and accepted his writings at face value (as opposed to those who have merely adopted the trappings and rituals as a source of comfort and order in their own lives) mean to convert, enslave, or destroy all non-Muslims; the very word “islam” means “submit”. Jews are singled out in his religious writings and sayings as deserving special hatred. Mohammad specifically asserted that Jesus was not the Son of God, but merely another prophet, inferior to himself.

As always, it matters not a lick whether those statements are true or not, although I certainly believe they are true. What matters is that I have the absolute right to make those statements. If you don’t like it, please feel free to say so in my comments.

(Prompted by Rusty, but I note that the actual day of “Mawlid” varies depending on whether you’re a Sunni or Shi’a, and it looks to be a day of “observance”, not the actual anniversary of his birth, the exact date of which seems to be unknown. But frankly, I don’t care. Any opportunity to piss upon the memory of this lunatic killer pleases me.)

[Update]
I am pleased to announce that the above post would be illegal in India:

In his first public function after recovering from cardiac bypass surgery, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today met a group of Muslim girls and used the occasion to assert that no one had the license to “criticise or run down” other religions.
Though Singh’s first official engagement was his meeting with a head of a State of an African country last week, his interaction with the children today was his first public engagement.

Greeting the children on the occasion of Milad-un-Nabi, he said “our Constitution gives full freedom to the people to practice any religion of their choice, but it does not give anyone the license to criticize or run down other religions.” Addressing the students studying in Urdu medium schools in the capital on the occasion of Prophet Mohammed’s birth anniversary, he said the country cannot prosper until women progress and girls were given equal opportunities to study in schools and colleges.

[Emphasis mine.]
[via The Volokh Conspiracy.]

Mind you, he is speaking of a religion which routinely inspires its followers to burn girls’ schools, sometimes with the girls still in them, and which works to see that even boys’ schools teach little but the rote memorization of the Koran.

Although some religious teaching seems to be no impediment — Catholic schools are renowned for the quality of their education — no country has prospered where the schools emphasize religion to the exclusion of verifiable fact.

He is also speaking of the religion which has been unremittingly and violently hostile to Hinduism, India’s majority religion. Note that since Judaism and Christianity are the theological roots of Islam, it allows Christians and Jews to practice their infidel superstitions, as long as they keep quiet about it, don’t build new temples or repair old ones, and pay the special jizya tax; but no such tolerance is granted to Hindus.

Oh, Texas? About emphasizing religion over facts? I’m looking at you, too.

[update 2]
Oren, in a comment at VC, links to the relevant clause in the Indian Constitution. It’s a handful of words outlining the rights — followed by a dense page of exceptions.

Look at how our government manages to pick at the very plainly stated rights given in the Bill of Rights (of course, with a special emphasis on the Second, where “shall not be infringed” has somehow morphed into “except as lawmakers and bureaucrats see fit).

Now imagine what happens when the exceptions have greater weight than the rights themselves.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Bill of Rights, Culture War, History, Jihad, Religion and Superstition, War on Jihad | 1 Comment »

Hitching Real Truth To Real Power

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

Christopher Hitchens gets beaten up in Lebanon for defacing a political poster, and even P.Z. Meyers over at Pharyngula admits Hitch has got brass.

To their credit, many of P.Z.’s commenters understand what Hitch did. Many don’t get it, though, crediting Hitch with alcohol or stupidty rather than bravery.

I won’t go quote-picking, scan down to get the flavor.

In response, my comment [#90]:

There’s folks who think that “speaking truth to power” means wearing pink and marching in Pelosi’s home district while carrying a sign equating George W. Bush with Hitler, knowing full well that Bush’s goons aren’t going to come after them for it, not then and there, not ever.

Then there’s Hitch, who understands that what it really means is insulting theocratic Nazis on their home turf where they will beat you up right there in the street in broad daylight.

Hitch may be a lot of things, but stupid isn’t on the list. He knew the risks and spoke the truth, and the power beat him up. I dare say that even sober he counted it worth the cost, because it got noticed, even here amongst those who do not understand what liberty and freedom of speech are really about, how precious they are, and what it costs to defend them.

Understand, folks: The religious fanatics who beat up Hitch want to beat up you, too, on your home ground. They want to convert you, enslave you, or destroy you, just like their holy book says they should, and frankly they’d be disappointed if you converted.

All over Europe, all over England, and right next door to the USA in Canada: governments are afraid, pissing their pants afraid, to let people criticize savages like those that beat up Hitch. If enough people do it anyway, liberty lives another day. Sit down, shut up, submit to demands that you speak not against Allah and his Prophet, and liberty dies in your heart.

Stand up for Hitch, right now — or kneel down, press your face to the dirt, and submit to Allah, as loudly as you can. Those are your choices. Pick one. Time’s running out.

There were a lot of comments I wanted to respond to directly, but then my eye was caught by sweet little Autumn, who, though she said some good stuff, started out comment #74 by saying:

[The] comment that the violence against Hitchens “proves that he was courageous and right” is not okay. If I were to scribble “fuck off, nigger” on an Obama poster in almost any inner city in America, I would be justifiably beaten up due to my actions.

[ My emphasis]

Well, no way I can let that pass:

“If you can’t say ‘fuck’, you can’t say ‘Fuck the government!” — St. Lenny the Bruce

I can’t believe how exactly your comment reflects that, and worse, how you seem to think that not being able to do that is a good thing, when the man in power is your man. Do you truly not understand that writing “Fuck Off Nigger” on an Obama poster is exactly the same as a BusHitler protest sign?

If so, I weep for you, child, I weep for us all.

Let me emphasize: I greatly admire P.Z.’s articles on evolution and atheism. His exposure of the great holy cracker brouhaha was excellent and brave.

He even understands that Islamic creationism is just as stupid and bad as Christian creationism.

What he does not understand is that where Christians will complain, loudly, and threaten you with lawsuits if you steal their crackers, Jihadists will kill you for drawing a cartoon of their prophet, or even just quoting their scriptures in a context that shows how violently evil their “prophet” was.

As always, my jihadist mantra:

There is no god, not even Allah, and Muhammad, may piss be upon him, was a child-raping mass murderer.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Bill of Rights, Biology, Dammit!, Dhimmis, Fighting Back, Jihad, Political Correctness, Religion and Superstition, Science, War on Jihad | 1 Comment »

QotD: “Bombs Are More Precious Than Children”

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

No. Words. I can’t think of much to say about this video, which I found by scrolling down the Mere Rhetoric main page after posting about British dhimmitude. What should be unspeakable speaks for itself.

I do, however, have some things to say about those who think the ideology behind this video can be tolerated.

The video shows the children’s programming produced by Hamas, the enemy that has the ear and sympathy of the American left, the Democratic Party (with the very brave exception of, pardon me while I gag on necessary praise, Hillary Clinton. This is a big part of why she lost the Democratic nomination: too much of a war monger), the media, the UN, and the Lightworker, Our Saviour, The Magic Negro. Here is what Time Magazine thinks Israel must necessarily lose to. Here is what Hamas teaches their children, starting in kindergarten:

[youtube link]
Look at schoolchildren in masks, carrying rifles, spouting hatred, learning they are precious only as martyrs.

Search for the love. Search for the tolerance. Search for the peace.

I don’t think you will find it here.

[Comment on Time's anti-Israel cover moved to its own post.]

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Dammit!, Dhimmis, Jihad, Media, Political Correctness | 1 Comment »

There Will Always Be…An Island Off the Coast of France: “Allahu Akhbar!”

Thursday, January 15th, 2009

Great Britain is no longer great. It is descending into multicultural  senility, and is being overrun by lawless yobs and Islamic usurpers.

Get it clear: the Islamic jihadists do not want to peacefully live among us, pursuing their own beliefs.

They want to violently convert us to those beliefs, and if we refuse to submit, enslave and destroy us.

Here is video of defenseless London riot police falling back from an anti-Semitic, anti-Israeli, anti-Britain, anti-Christian, anti-Western-Civilization Jihadist mob. “Run, you fucking cowards!” “Allahu Akhbar!” “Free Fatah!”

They openly, and correctly, hold their uniformed opponents in utter contempt. The police were not even allowed to wear face shield helmets in this confrontation — their superiors thought it might be “too intimidating”.

Cowards, yes indeed. Spineless, abject cowards. It’s clear who was actually intimidated.

“There will always be an England.” No. No there won’t. Not at this rate.

There will always be an island off the coast of France, but it will no longer be anything remotely like England.

[Youtube link.] [Crap. Youtube has flagged the direct link as possible "inappropriate content", meaning you must login to verify that you are over 18 to view. I think the above embed will work. Let me know if it does not. I should note that although there are cusswords in this clip, Islamists make a concerted effort to track down and flag or remove videos that make them look bad.]

Omri Ceren at Mere Rhetoric:

British Islam has functionally defeated British Anglicanism. Schools are canceling Christmas in favor of Eid. Defending Christianity on the radio is now a firing offense. British prisoners are converting en masse to Islam either to get gang protection or because Muslims, having hijacked maximum security prisons, are forcing them to.

Everyday British institutions – those daily things that give life and color to a culture – are being gutted whenever they conflict with Muslim sensibilities. Historic pubs are being quickly altered whenever they rouse offense. Cultural staples like pork are becoming subject to discrimination lawsuits.

Meanwhile bloody Ashura flogging is now a public British ritual. There is a wave of honor killings crashing across Britain, with brothers killing their own sisters. Sharia – having been supported by a broad range of British legal officials – has now been officially incorporated into financial policy and civil law. “Moderate” British Muslim organizations are launching witchhunts against Muslims who cooperate with anti-terrorism investigators. “Moderate” British mosques are hosting 9/11 champions. The country is crawling with jihadists. British radicals even have their own airline.

Conclusion: it’s over.

Via Mike at Cold Fury.

As always, my manifesto:

There is no god, not even Allah; and Muhammad, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a deranged, child-molesting mass-murderer.

It doesn’t matter whether this statement is true or not, or even if I believe it or not. I have an absolute right to say such things, regardless of who it happens to offend, and regardless of any laws or Supreme Court rulings. Even if the Constitution is repudiated, my right to free speech, and to act according to my conscience, even in matters of life and death, is absolute.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Cops, Culture War, Dammit!, Dhimmis, History, Island Off French Coast (England), Jihad, Political Correctness, Religion and Superstition, War on Jihad | 2 Comments »

« Older Entries