Posts Tagged ‘houston’

QotD: “People Should Believe That If They’re Going to Rob a Business, the Business Owner Is Gonna Have… Protection”

Sunday, December 19th, 2010

Quote of the Day from Ken Nealy, of the Houston Police Robbery Division:

Most knowledgeable, or reasonable, people should believe that if they’re going to rob a business, the business owner is gonna have some type of protection to protect themselves, their property and their employees, so that should be considered food for thought.

OK, not the most elegant statement ever made on the topic. ["Knowledgeable or reasonable" robbers, Ken? How many of those have you run across in your investigations?] And I’d love to see this coming from our police chief, and our Mayor.

But clearly the tide is turning.

The clearest indicator, in fact, is that this quote comes from a local TV station, KHOU Channel 11.

This is in the context of recent incidents in which a jewelry store owner shot and killed three robbers, and a grocery store owner shot two robbers and killed one of them.

The reports are straightforward, and do not decry shop owners defending themselves. Local black and Hispanic leaders are not quoted as blaming the robbers’ actions on society. Most important, the comments at KHOU’s website are overwhelmingly in favor of the self-defenders.

KHOU was to my knowledge the soul TV presence at the Houston Teaparty event, and their coverage of that was also favorable, or at least neutral. I think they’re getting a clue.

Update:

I wanted to praise Investigator Nealy on his remark, but could find no contact email (understandably, I guess). Instead, I emailed Officer McCoy, who runs the HPD Recruiting Blog:

I was pleased, even a bit stunned, to see KHOU’s recent report on the trend among shop owners to arm themselves against robbery. This report featured a clip of your own Ken Nealy of the Robbery Division saying, “Most knowledgeable, or reasonable, people should believe that if they’re going to rob a business, the business owner is gonna have some type of protection to protect themselves, their property and their employees, so that should be considered food for thought.”

The concept of “knowledgeable or reasonable” armed robbers aside, this is an outstanding position for a police official to take. I can think of no greater deterrent to crime than the wide-spread knowledge among even unreasonable would-be robbers that they risk far more than yet another trip through the revolving court system door.

Investigator Nealy exemplifies Sir Robert Peel’s Seventh Principle of Policing: “Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.”

This attitude will go far to engender mutual respect between all citizens who lawfully defend their communities and themselves, in uniform and out, and to breaking down the us-and-them wall that weakens our resolve, our security, and our liberty.

Please, if you can, forward my appreciation to Investigator Nealy. I encourage his superiors to support his statement, loudly and publicly. (Including Captain Holloway, Asst. Chief Montalvo, Chief McClelland, and Mayor Parker. And not neglecting Captain Slinkard and Deputy Director Woolfolk.)

Update: Aw, dang it! Officer McCoy is ignoring his email until after Christmas, and he’s about the only online HPD contact I could find.

Trapped

Monday, September 22nd, 2008

So, I’m at my sister’s house, gorging on media after gorging on spaghetti with her, the kids, and the folks. I finally work through the bookmarks, and get ready to go home.

Hm, that curfew expired, like, Friday, right?

Well, no, in fact.

…Power outages across much of the city prompted Houston police to extend the citywide curfew until further notice.

Curfew hours are from midnight until 6 a.m.

“The purpose of the curfew is to protect the lives and property of all residents as law enforcement and other officials respond to emergencies and engage in recovery activities related to this disaster,” the news release states.

“Therefore, if you are commuting to and from work, operating a business, or eating at a restaurant, for example, you should not have a problem,” it says.

Residents should expect to be stopped and questioned by police.

[bold mine]

Excuse me, you assholes, but I count being stopped and questioned by the police when I am doing nothing more than driving home as a problem.

A curfew for a brief, limited period of time in the wake of the storm is one thing, but “until further notice” is something else entirely.

The lights may be out, but most neighborhoods I’ve seen are more or less back to normal, if a bit messy. People are no longer shocked. They want to get on with their lives.

I want to go home, dammit, whether I have power or not.

I want to go home, dammit, without being stopped by the police for no reason.

I want to go home, dammit, feed my cats, and sleep in my own bed, sweaty sheets and all, and I can’t, because the old nannies who think the city of Houston is their nursery are once again keeping me safe from myself.

Hm, more careful reporting: The Chron says the curfew is “indefinite”. However, I found this press release on the HPD website, and it says, “until Sunday, September 2″. Which is it, guys? Can I drive home or not?

Eduoard: Rain On Me

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

I’ll be updating for as long as Reliant Energy, Comcast, and the elements allow.

18:50 OK, then. Yeah, it rained some. Yeah, there’s some leaves on the ground, so we evidently had some wind while I napped this afternoon. Yeah, some neighborhoods lost power. Mostly, though, this was a practice exercise, a drill for emergency procedures. Good. Everybody has fresh batteries, fresh bottled water, well-stocked pantries. We’re ready if/when a real storm or other disaster hits.

Nothing, however, nothing to justify the intense news coverage.

10:45 Hm, the second band, now approaching, seems wider and heavier than the first, and is getting heavier.

10:37 Edouard continues to non-eventuate. There’s two main rainbands; I’m currently in the quiet zone between them. The first one was moderately heavy, light gusting winds.

I had to go out as the first one went over to, yes, clean my gutters. I have to have gutters to keep the water away from the house, particularly the back patio, but they clog repeatedly through the season. Yes, I should have cleaned them yesterday.

A year or two after mine went up, leaf-shedding covers became popular. My sister and parents have them; they seem to work. I’m looking at a retro-fit, because I’m tired of looking out my kitchen window and seeing a waterfall, and having to go out in the rain to clean them. It doesn’t help that I always forget that if I just wait half an hour, the rain will let up, as just happened.

09:00 Non-event so far. Light rain, no significant wind, no lightning. Current radar is yellow over my area, and the red bands fade out as they approach.

Here’s my favorite radar, which presents a synopsis of the storm’s history.

07:05 Eduoard makes landfall, per KHOU. We’re on the “dirty side”, which, oddly, is the west side.

06:45 I woke up at about 6:30. It has just started raining; the ground is just getting wet, and water hasn’t started coming out of the house gutters yet. It’s calm and muggy.