Posts Tagged ‘Eric Holder’

Going On Record: Eric Holder Wanted Poster

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

No comment necessary.

alt

Wanted for: International gun trafficking, Accessory to murder, Conspiracy to commit murder, Treason against the United States of America, Aiding and Abetting foreign enemies, Human Rights Violations

[via Sipsey Street.]

In related news, the 1968 Gun Control Act is rooted in Nazi gun control laws.

Are you tired of being told that “gun control” is a chronic pain that you have to accept because there’s no cure? Do you — a law abiding person — want to be free: to own whichever firearms you want to own, regardless of where in America you live; from waiting periods, gun bans, magazine capacity restrictions, etc.; to spend your time on the range or in the field, rather than fighting “gun control”?

Are you tired of giving hard earned bucks to efforts that have at best only slowed the gun grabbers’ push toward firearms registration and confiscation? If you have had enough of death by a thousand cuts, you are ready to take action to wipe out “gun control” — now.

Members of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO) consider “gun control” to be an aggressive cancer. JPFO has a cure, a way to destroy “gun control”. JPFO has hard evidence that shows that the Nazi Weapons Law (March 18, 1938) is the source of the U.S Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA ’68). Adolph Hitler signed the Nazi Weapons Law. The Gestapo (Nazi National Secret Police) enforced it. In “Gun Control”: Gateway to Tyranny we present the official German text of the Nazi Weapons Law and a side-by-side translation into English. Even more deadly: a side-by-side, section-by-section comparison of the GCA ’68 with the Nazi Weapons Law. If you have this in your hands, no one can tell you that you’re imagining things.

The clincher: JPFO knows who implanted into American law cancerous ideas from the Nazi Weapons Law.

The likely culprit is a former senator, now deceased. We have documentary proof — see below — that he had the original text of the Nazi Weapons Law in his possession 4 months before the bill that became GCA ’68 was signed into law.

From Jews For the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. If anybody understands what’s at stake here, these folks do.

Waterboarding Eric Holder With The Truth

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

Lindsay Graham (R-SC) upbraids Eric Holder over trying KSM in a civilian court:


Scott at Powerline explains why trying KSM in a civilian court is an “Insane Protocol”. He also provides a link to the actual, official policy document. [Since this looks like one of those docs that might change or fall down the memory hole, I've saved it here.]


Andy McCarthy at National Review Online identifies and answers eight lies Holder tells in his testimony.


Let me explain, for those who haven’t been paying attention or doing their homework, the difference between criminal justice and war:

In criminal justice, you seek out the individual responsible for a specific illegal act, and punish that individual for that act accordingly.

In war, you seek to punish an entire nation or other polity for acting in a way you do not like. The purpose is not to punish this or that individual for this or that act, but to bring your enemies to their knees and make them beg you to stop. The technical word for this is surrender, and an honorable victor will accept the surrender and cease making war.

KSM is not an individual committing specific illegal acts who needs to be punished. He is a member of a foreign polity, and a leader within that polity, determined to bring about our surrender. That polity is making war upon us. When we protect its warriors with the safeguards of our justice system, we are bowing down, preparing to surrender.

“The Darkest of Thoughts”

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

Sipsey Street Irregular Mike Vanderboegh writes to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, and explains that there’s an ugly fight coming. “No more free Wacos”, says Mike, and he’s not talking about religious whackos having free reign to to rape children and kill cops; he’s talking about the Federal Government burning men, women, and children who do not toe the line, and then blocking any investigation.

The inspiration for this piece is the case of David Olofson, now rotting in prison because he was in possession of a malfunctioning semi-automatic rifle. He threatened no one, he didn’t offer to sell it, he didn’t claim it was a machine gun. The malfunction was a dangerous one that could easily injure the shooter; there is video of the BATFX technician holding it well away from his body while testing, in case it blew up in his hand.

And yet Olofson was charged and convicted with possession of an unlicensed full-auto machine gun.

- By your department’s failure to restrain [BATX Field Agent Jody] Keeku’s outrageous conduct in returning the weapon to the ATF Testing Branch after it had been found by them NOT TO BE A MACHINEGUN but simply a malfunctioning semiauto rifle, with the demand that they retest it until they came to her opinion;

- By the trial judge’s refusal to allow defense experts to even examine the weapon; and

- By the appellate court’s blind refusal to allow a new trial based on these and other prosecutorial misdeeds,

Those are issues specific to Olofson’s case. Here are the broader implications:

if we can no longer count on a fair trial in a case of obvious ATF misconduct, then rationally, we have no reasonable expectation of a fair trial at all. In that case, we then are faced, when approached by any law enforcement officer attempting to enforce any gun law, with a Hobson’s choice:

- Submit, and be railroaded unfairly into prison, or

- Resist, and endure not only the personal consequences of that defiance, but also the likely consequences of a regional or even national conflagration.

Read the whole thing, please, as you value your life of peace and freedom.

Right now there’s a debate raging about whether or not gun owners should go about openly carrying and displaying their firearms, particularly handguns in a holster, in states that allow them to do so legally.

Read that again: informed, reasonable, law abiding, gun owners, people who have up till now been strong advocates for the right to keep and bear arms, are afraid to exercise their legal, lawful right. It might upset people. It might bring them in conflict with law officers, many of whom are very unaccustomed to and nervous around unbadged law-abiding citizens who happen to be armed.

There was an incident recently where a woman was threatened with arrest or shooting for wearing an empty leather holster at a Second Amendment protest.

A right is not a right if you can’t use it. I don’t care if it upsets people “scares the white folks”, to echo the response to Negroes eating at whites-only lunch counters, and riding up front in the bus.

This isn’t about “recruitment”. Not even about “acclimatisation”.

This is about putting our government, and our fellow citizens, on notice. We’ve been pushed right up to the line, and the trench grave lies on the other side.

Not backing down. Not hiding.

Not compromising.

Especially not compromising, because we’ve been compromising since nineteen thirty four, and all we have to show for it is a single, 5-4 Supreme Court ruling that yes, the Second protects an individual right, but no, the government can infringe it pretty much any way it wants, short of a total ban.

For all that, we at least want to be able to carry our legal weapons on our hips, in public.

Our empty holsters, even.

Listening, Mr. Holder? Hear the trumpets, hear the pipers? The one hundred million angles singing? The multitudes are marching to the big kettle drum, and they’re coming for you.

You swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic, Mr. Holder. Uphold that oath, live it, breath it — or wait for the day when you can no longer escape being caught out as one of those the rest of us are defending it from. Your oath is wearing pretty god damned thin.

Wake up. Listen.

You will lose if you fight us.

Credit Where Due: Obama Pulling Back in the War on Drugs Citizens?

Friday, February 27th, 2009

This is so intelligent, and gives up such a huge lever with which to control The People, I’m having a hard time believing it’s Obama doing it.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is sending strong signals that President Obama – who as a candidate said states should be allowed to make their own rules on medical marijuana – will end raids on pot dispensaries in California.

Asked at a Washington news conference Wednesday about Drug Enforcement Administration raids in California since Obama took office last month, Holder said the administration has changed its policy.

“What the president said during the campaign, you’ll be surprised to know, will be consistent with what we’ll be doing here in law enforcement,” he said. “What he said during the campaign is now American policy.”

“Will end raids,” of course, suggests that raids haven’t yet stopped, but I think this is for real, and very encouraging.

All I can think of is “opiate of the people”. Obama will have so many other means of controlling our lives — gun control, education control, health control, finance control, porn control, child control — drug control would be redundant, and letting the proles get high is a good way to convince them you’re on their side.

The War on Drugs has served its purpose; the Fourth and Fifth Amendments are almost entirely erased, and policies established to fight the Drug Scourge can now be expanded into every other field of liberty, and we will be too stoned to care.

Via The Agitator, Radley Balko.