Posts Tagged ‘cold fury’

Japete Attempts Reasonable Discussion

Tuesday, February 5th, 2013

Over at Commengunsense, and invites the rest of us to answer twenty questions.

I submitted answers, but somehow clicking preview resulted in publishing, so there are likely errors. Fortunately, I saved a copy before submitting. So here it is, as it went it up, bumbling and all.

1. …Criminals and domestic abusers should be able to buy guns…

People who can’t be trusted with guns, can’t be trusted with liberty.

2. What is your proposal for keeping guns away from criminals, domestic abusers, terrorists and dangerously mentally ill people?

No way to do this without also infringing on the rights of the law abiding and peaceable.

3. Do you believe that a background check infringes on your constitutional right to “keep and bear arms”?

Absolutely.

4. Do you believe that I and people with whom I work intend to ban your guns?

Absolutely.

5. If yes to #4, how do you think that could happen (I mean the physical action)?

Door to door civil war. Not the way it would start — mandatory, universal registration is a good bet — but that’s how it would end.

6. What do you think are the “second amendment remedies” that the tea party GOP candidate for Senate in Nevada( Sharron Angle) has proposed?

Don’t know about Angle, but for me, if civil servants know that their masters, their masters, are armed as well as they are, they’ll be civil, not surly.
[Gah. This should be, "if civil servants know that their masters, the people".]

7. Do you believe in the notion that if you don’t like what someone is doing or saying, second amendment remedies should be applied?

Hahahahaha. No.

8. Do you believe it is O.K. to call people with whom you disagree liars and demeaning names?

I believe it is OK to call liars, liars. And when people demean me verbally, I should turn the other cheek. Or ignore them. As soon as they start trying to demean me with the law, or through force, though, it is OK for me to resist. With lethal force, if nothing less suffices.

9. If yes to #8, would you do it in a public place to the person’s face?

I would respond in kind.

10. Do you believe that any gun law will take away your constitutional rights?

Yes, excepting laws against using weapons to commit violent crimes.

11. Do you believe in current gun laws? Do you think they are being enforced? If not, explain.

I believe there are current gun laws, yes. I believe most of them infringe the right to arms. And certainly they’re being enforced — sometimes, but often not against violent criminals. They exist and are enforced to disarm the lawabiding, not the criminal.

12. Do you believe that all law-abiding citizens are careful with their guns and would never shoot anybody?

No.

13. Do you believe that people who commit suicide with a gun should be included in the gun statistics?

I believe my right to arms ought not be judged with statistics.

14. Do you believe that accidental gun deaths should “count” in the total numbers?

See 13.

15. Do you believe that sometimes guns, in careless use or an accident, can shoot a bullet without the owner or holder of the gun pulling the trigger?

See 13.

16. Do you believe that 30,000 gun deaths a year is too many?

See 13.

17. How will you help to prevent more shootings in this country?
Arm the law abiding. Restrain the government. Repeal laws against contraband, especially, and allow law enforcement to concentrate on crimes with actual victims.

18. Do you believe the articles that I have posted

I’m not familiar with these articles.

19. There has been some discussion of the role of the ATF here. Do you believe the ATF wants your guns and wants to harass you personally?

I doubt the ATF has ever heard of me.

20. Will you continue a reasonable discussion towards an end that might lead somewhere or is this an exercise in futility?

I have tried, dozens and dozens of times, to engage in reasonable discussion.

But I have learned that almost always, “reasonable discussion” means that I’m supposed to shut up and do what I’m told. For my own good, of course.

Found via Cold Fury and Lawdog.

QotD: Things We Think But Don’t Write

Friday, January 18th, 2013

Mike, writing as always in a Cold Fury, applauds the Missouri bill to make enforcement of any federal gun ban a felony, and stabs to the heart of the tyrants:

It’s no mystery why they hate [the Second Amendment] so much, and are so afraid of it; the fact is, they’re supposed to be. That’s, umm, the whole friggin’ point.

I should add that in this case, it’s not fear that keeps us from writing it, it’s that we have this in our hearts and bones; it’s one of our underlying assumptions. We forget that not everyone understands this.

And, of course, our servants, who should properly be trembling in fear of our lash, pray daily that not only do we withhold it, but that we forget it was ever in our hands.

“Topsy Turvey World”

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012

Mike at Cold Fury details how just how far off track we’ve gotten:

Okay, let me see if I have all this straight. Bill Clinton, a white Southerner, was the first black president. Obama, an apparently straight guy, is the first gay president. George Zimmerman, a Hispanic, is a white guy. Elizabeth Warren, the whitest white woman anybody ever saw, is an Injun.

Andrew Sullivan, a liberal, considers himself the last “true conservative.” The Democrat Socialists, left-wingers to a fault, consider themselves “centrist” or “moderate,” and Mitt Romney, who is a liberal, is a “right-wing extremist.”

The overwhelming majority of people who call themselves “journalists” actually function as advocates, while laughably declaiming their unbiased impartiality to anyone gullible enough to buy it. Violent OWS revolutionaries are “mostly peaceful.”

Hollywood rich people worth bajillions perfectly comprehend the travails of workaday Americans and portray them with unfailing accuracy in movies and on TV, but Romney, who actually has done useful work and created lots of jobs in his life, is “out of touch.”

The people who rule us with an iron fist, governing against the clearly-expressed will of the people as often as not, are “public servants.” Fossil fuels, of which America has more than any other nation in the world, are “unsustainable,” while unworkable and expensive alternatives like solar and electric cars are what we should be relying on instead.

There’s no one more illiberal than a liberal; “shut up, he explained” is the operational philosophy of the very people who claim to be more tolerant and open-minded than the folks whose dissent (which is patriotic, except when it’s expressing disagreement with proposals that run counter to the ideas of the Founders) they’re trying their level best to stifle.

Every word is the plain simple truth. Go read all of them. It was really hard to pick the ones I copied here.

Whip of the Day: Yelling at Obama

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

Mike at Cold Fury:

I’m…beginning to think that yelling at Obama for failing to protect America is like yelling at a six-year old for failing to make a dentist appointment, open a 401k and install vinyl siding on the house.

This, at the end of a post answering an often heard argument that this law or that is Constitutionally justified by the “General Welfare” clause of the Pre-Amble:

Every law ever written was aimed at someone’s idea of “the general Welfare”. Justice Taney thought he was promoting the general welfare when he returned Dred Scot to his owner.

Go read the whole thing, it’s short and worthy.

‘Naug ‘Dress

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

MikeNoel at Cold Fury takes Hussein’s Inaugural Address apart line by line.

“…AND I DECREE THAT HENCEFORTH, TAXES SHALL BE KNOWN AS “TITHES”…”

A Fisking

My fellow citizens:

Um…could you show me the birth certificate first?

We the people have remained faithful to the ideals of our forebears, and true to our founding documents.

No the hell we haven’t. We’ve been trashing them by calling them “Living” documents, and making them mean the opposite of what they actually mean. And by “we”, I mean, of course, “you”.

On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas

but enough about my wife.

The time has come to set aside childish things.

Good. And you can start with that poet lady who speaks in the cadence preferred by university lesbians and Soviet Schoolmarms: “Good. Mor. Ning. Chil. Dren. Please. Get. Out. Your. Brave. Leader. Text. Books.”

See, this is the kind of good natured ribbing and constructive criticism that marks a true patriot. I mean, that’s what the lefties have been saying about their giant puppet heads for eight years, right? They’re not going to stop now, are they?

Because giant puppet heads — wow, George Washington would have been so proud.

Whollyweird Liberal Lies

Monday, October 13th, 2008

Via Cold Fury, the unbelievable news that Annette Bening

Annette Bening in a red dress

Annette Bening in a red dress

…will play the role of Helen Thomas in Ryan Murphy’s Nixon pic Dirty Tricks.

Helen Thomas on the left Nixon on the right.

Helen Thomas on the left Nixon on the right.

“Whitewashing the past” doesn’t even begin to cover it. As Mike says, “Not enough makeup in the world.”


Crap, I forgot the credits.

Bening’s pic via IMDB. Thomas’ via, dang it, a link I cannot now find, I believe the Army Times [ah, found it] Stars and Stripes.

I believe that both were about 50 years old when their respective pictures were taken.

Of course, when we see her name, most of think of at least this Annette Bening:

Bening with Michael Douglas in The American President

Bening with Michael Douglas in The American President

[via Geocities.]

Some of us, of course, remember this saucy grifter. I refuse to believe that Helen Thomas ever looked like that.

Socialist Gulags

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

Mike at Cold Fury excerpts two great articles contrasting the fascination of the socialist left with tyranny,  and what happens when you really do speak truth to power.

Excerpting his excerpts, here’s a whiff of Ralph Peters:

The extreme left loves to pretend it stands for freedom. It never has and never will. From the Reign of Terror in Paris onward, its core agenda has been the tyranny of egomaniacal intellectuals. The hard left hates an open debate – especially these days, when it’s out of new ideas.

The truly outrageous aspect of such comparisons is that the American left, with its Stalin-redux willingness to rearrange history, neglects to mention that, outside of Japan, all of the 20th century’s great totalitarian regimes had roots on the political left.

[Note: Japan's regime arose from a true imperialism, not capitalism or libertarianism.]

And a good strong snort of Christopher Hitchens, himself a leftist who seems to be waking up:

The simplest way of phrasing it is to say that Solzhenitsyn lived “as if.” Barely deigning to notice the sniggering, pick-nose bullies who followed him and harassed him, he carried on “as if” he were a free citizen, “as if” he had the right to study his own country’s history, “as if” there were such a thing as human dignity.

Read the whole things, all three of them.