Archive for the ‘War on Jihad’ Category

Christian Violence: Tavis Smiley

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

Joe Hicks over at Pajamas Media highlights an interview with Hirsi Ali, who “fled a traditional Muslim life in Somalia, a life that included being the victim of female genital mutilation as a child, and eventually made her way to the Netherlands where she rejected Islam and literally underwent an intellectual awakening. She now lives in America.” Ali is under a death threat fatwa for her work with slain filmmaker Theo Van Gogh on Submission, which exposes Islam’s vile misogyny.

The interviewer was Tavis Smiley of PBS. You can watch the interview here.

It’s also important to know that Hirsi Ali lives under the constant watch of security guards, since her life continues to be threatened by Islamic extremists.

This was the woman who walked onto Tavis Smiley’s PBS show to promote her new book. Nomad calls on key institutions of the West — universities, feminists, and Christian churches — to wage a war of ideas against Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism.

However, Smiley was in no mood to hear Hirsi Ali’s arguments that placed Islam in a bad light. He wanted to assert the old leftist claim that Islam is always and everywhere “a religion of peace.”

Look at this jaw-dropping exchange between Smiley and Hirsi Ali:

Smiley: But Christians do that every single day in this country. …

Ali: Do they blow people up every single day?

Smiley: Yes, Christians. Every day, people walk into post offices, they walk into schools, that’s what Columbine — I mean I could do this all day long. There’s so many more examples of Christians — and I happen to be a Christian — that’s back to this notion of you idealizing Christianity to my read. There’s so many more examples, Ayaan, of Christians who do that than you could ever give me examples of Muslims who have done that inside this country where you live and work.

Beyond the irritating liberal arrogance is the complete ignorance of the facts involved here.
Let’s ignore momentarily the dozens of terror plots — all designed and organized by Muslim-Americans — that have been uncovered and thwarted by this nation’s security forces. I will instead direct Smiley’s attention to these attacks against Americans:

  • 1993: The World Trade Center bombing in New York killed 6 people.
  • 1996: The Khobar Towers bombing killed 20 and wounded 372.
  • 1998: The bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania left 224 dead and 4,000 injured.
  • 2001: On 9/11, 19 hijackers flew planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 perished.
  • 2009: U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan shot and killed 13 at Texas’ Fort Hood.
  • 2010: Faisal Shahzad attempted to detonate a car bomb in Times Square.

Uh, where’s a similar listing of Christian-inspired acts of violence, Mr. Smiley? The sweeping ignorance, or political blindness, of Smiley’s claim that “Christians do that (commit acts of terror) every single day in this country” is nothing short of astounding.

Unlike Islam, Christian scripture does not guarantee paradise to those who kill in the name of their faith. But the Koran does offer the fruits of paradise to “those who kill for Allah.” Suicide bombers have been lured to their deaths with this promise and the offer that they will be free from the fires of hell if they kill an infidel and, in the process, die.

[My emphasis.]

That last, right there, is the key that makes Islam so toxic. Even turn-the-other-cheek, meek-inheriting-the-earth Christianity can be perverted to excuse violence in its name, but Mohammed actively encouraged it, and led Muslim armies against the infidels in his own time.

Nevertheless, let me for a moment be the devil’s advocate.

First, if you want the list of Christian terrorist acts here in America, look up abortion clinic bombings and murders. However, note that these acts are committed not to force the Christian faith on others, but because the anti-abortionists believe that a wholesale murder of innocents is taking place. I happen not to agree with that, although it’s a close call, but if I did, I hope that I too would be doing everything in my power to stop it. Not to terrorize, mind, but to directly disrupt a human slaughterhouse. I hope I’d do the same against guard barracks in Nazi concentration camps or Soviet gulags or, um, Save The Earth re-education camps, should they ever come to pass.

Outside of America, look at Northern Ireland. However, while that conflict has a religious cast to it, the underlying conflict is one for political independence. It’s ugly as hell, and the actions involved are totally unjustified, but it’s not a war of religious expansion.

I’ll also note that both clinic bombings and the Irish fight have died down considerably in recent years. The practitioners have either fallen to attrition, or realized they were not getting the kind of sympathy they hoped for.

Second, although I don’t have a list to hand, I think there have been many nut jobs who do commit horrible crimes in the name of Christianity. Thing is, they are nut jobs, acting in direct contravention of the scriptures they cite, and they do not remotely have the support of mainstream Christian clerics.

Finally, undoubtedly many Christians do commit ordinary crimes, but not in the name of Christ — the Roman Catholic Mafioso is a classic stereotype. However, the attraction of this stereotype in fiction is precisely the huge disconnect between the professed faith and the daily life.

“Uh, how about the Spanish Inquisition? Galileo, dude!” The Inquisition was indeed brutal, but it was only carried out against other Christians, not as a weapon of evangelism against other faiths. And even the Catholic Church eventually realized that the Inquisition was not only against scripture, but counterproductive in practice, actually turning people away from the faith. It forced Western Civilization to grow the hell up.

The Islamic Jihad is the only longstanding and still very much active, program of violence against non-coreligionists, is strongly rooted in scripture, and is endorsed, advocated, and managed by the highest ranks of the Muslim clergy. It spreads an oppressive creed of utter intolerance towards the highest ideals of classical liberal, and even neo-liberal, political ideology. (Except statism. Neo-liberals love them their statism.)

And it is vastly more promiscuously lethal than the anti-abortionists, or even the Irish Republican Army, ever dreamed of being.

Smiley here is covering for evil on the largest scale. He is not hiding Nazis in his attic, he’s openly shilling for them.

He calls himself a Christian, but in fact is calling for the eradication of the faith he claims to serve.

Shame.

Blockade Rules

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

Over at the Anti-Idiotarian, LC Subotai Bahadur, Lord Pao An, has the rules of war that govern blockades. Guess what? Turns out Israel isn’t a rogue state after all.

The Hamas pseudo-government in Gaza, on the other hand….

Is there a state of belligerency between the Palestinian authorities who govern Gaza and the State of Israel?

Yes. The Palestinian government of Gaza has repeatedly declared itself to be at war with Israel, conducted attacks on Israeli territory, civilians, and armed forces. It has refused to negotiate with the government of Israel. If you accept that the Palestinians govern Gaza, they are at war. If they do not govern Gaza, then the area and its inhabitants are pirates, bandits, etc. and are outside the laws of nations.

And again:

If Palestinian Gaza is a state, which is at war with Israel; as a non-signer of the Hague and Geneva Conventions, neither those in arms against Israel, nor their civilian counterparts are covered by them. If Palestinian Gaza is NOT a state, and is not under the jurisdiction of a state [and no one I know of claims them] they are at best “unlawful combatants” and more like “hostis humani generis“.

That status accrues also to foreign nationals who act on their behalf as part of their war effort.

Incidentally, I’d never run across the term “hostis humani generis“ before; it translates as “enemy of all mankind”.

The attempt to divert or capture (52a) the blockade running flotilla was in fact what was required by international law as a first resort. They were attempting to exercise military control (52b) as allowed under the laws of naval warfare in maintaining a blockade. Since the blockade is in place to bar offensive weapons, especially rockets and missiles, from reaching Gaza to prevent further firings on Israeli civilians, a refusal to allow inspection or diversion does raise a reasonable assumption that it is carrying weapons, regardless of what they claim. That makes them a legitimate military objective (52c).

Israel had every legal right to declare the blockade, to enforce it where their judgment of military requirements says to place the blockade line, to stop, to board, to search, or to divert any ship attempting to approach the blockade line. Under international law. And under that same international law, once there was resistance or refusal; they had every right to sink those vessels. And they still do for the next wave coming at them, and any after that.

Yes, international law grants rights and protections in war zones to innocent civilian traffic. But to keep those rights and to not be re-classified as a target, it also imposes responsibilities and duties of compliance. Failure to fulfill those responsibilities, or comply with directions means you are no longer an innocent civilian, but rather an enemy belligerent, subject to treatment as such.

Well worth your time and study.

It always strikes me that most people think the Geneva Conventions mean, more or less, that America and Israel must not defend themselves, that we are forbidden any but the most cautious self-defense.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Indeed, the sense I’ve gotten from my own study of these Conventions, cursory as it’s been, is that vigorous self-defense, and unrelenting pursuit of outlaw nations, was regarded by the Convention authors and early signers to be necessary for the maintenance of peace and the rule of law among nations.

Obama Doesn’t Screw An Ally

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Official: US Will Stand With Israel,” says ABC news.

I am greatly relieved to hear this. I wish the response had been faster and much, much stronger, but at least BO didn’t outright condemn Israel for defending its borders.

[update]
As I reread the article, I realize: this is an unidentified “official” speaking, not a formal announcement of Obama’s policy. And it’s very vague, simply a refusal to condemn, not a statement of support. Very weak; downright cowardly, even. A refusal to take stand, rather than picking sides.

America should lead, Mr. President. You should lead. Toning down the UN Security Council resolution is far from leading.

[/update]

Whenever The He does something even remotely correct, I have to wonder: was this His own opinion, His natural leadership?

Or did certain “advisers” from, say, the military and intelligence agencies show up unannounced in the Oval Office, shut the door behind them with a Marine or two standing guard outside, and explain exactly what would happen if The He followed His natural impulse to betray the country He pretends to lead?

Not, mind, just in terms of unintended consequences, but in terms of what would happen to Him, personally.


Related:

Ace of Spades is on the ball:

The downside is the underlying assumption that the problem with the ‘peace process’ is Israel. That some how if only Israel feels secure then everything will be rainbows and skittles in the Mideast.

The use of Turks as the shock troops was also inspired. While that country has become more and more Islamist over the years, it still had at least relatively cordial relations with Israel.

Not any more.

And James Lewis at Pajamas Media has an excellent analysis of the message Israel is trying to send:

Why did they decide to stop the flotilla with commandos? There are more imaginative ways to do that.

I think the decision was deliberate, and it was not aimed at the blockade-running convoy. It was a signal to Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, Iran, and most of all the United States — because we are in the midst of the most dangerous war confrontation in decades. This was also a signal for the Obama administration, which just stabbed Israel in the back at another UN phony “peace” conference.

Everything being done by Israel and its enemies today has a double purpose: It is what it is, and it’s also a strategic signal. This time the cabinet and PM decided to show their very sharp claws. It meant: This time we are willing to preempt you with gunfire. Take heed, because we are not interested in PR.

[Bold mine]
Read the whole thing; Lewis provides many interesting links.

And I hope he’s right, that Israel at long last is getting serious about its national sovereignty.

I hope Obama learns the lesson.

Netzach Israel

Monday, May 31st, 2010

I wish you victory, Oh Israel, liberty’s greatest ally in the Middle East.

I look for the fall of your enemies, who are also my enemies.

I call shame upon those who revile you, even unto my countrymen.

Ghost of a Flea has the goods on Israel defending its naval blockade against Gaza.

Statement from the IDF:

Early this morning, IDF Naval Forces boarded six ships attempting to break the maritime closure of the Gaza Strip. This happened after numerous warnings from Israel and the Israeli Navy that were issued prior to the action. The Israel Navy requested the ships to redirect toward Ashdod where they would be able to unload their aid supplies which would then be transferred over land after undergoing security inspections.

During the boarding of the ships, the demonstrators onboard attacked the IDF Naval personnel with live fire and light weaponry including knives and clubs. Additionally one of the weapons used was grabbed from an IDF soldier. The demonstrators had clearly prepared their weapons in advance for this specific purpose.

Go read the whole thing.

Statement from the Flea:

Only for Israel – and Arizona – is it a crime to enforce national sovereignty.

Here’s The Flea again on an outrageous United Nations “resolution” calling for a nuclear free Middle East singling out Israel, but saying nothing of Iran. I am disgusted and ashamed that the traitor governmentregime now sitting inoccupying Washington, D.C., apparently “supports” this resolution. Of course, this is cited as indicating “American” support, but no. Fiercely no. I am more American than BO (but then, Israel itself is more American than BO, at least in spirit), and I condemn this resolution, and will personally rejoice at whatever actions Israel takes to defend itself against the enemy we share.

Including the stationing of nuclear submarines off the coast of Iran, also reported by the Flea. Any sane person hopes, prays, fervently, that those manning these terrible weapons are never called upon to actually use them — but if this happens, I for one will be relieved at the destruction of a threat my own government is too cowardly to counter, or even name.

Today, it is those who condemn Israel who are full of crap, not those who stand with her.

On this Memorial Day, I honor those who have fought, are fighting, for liberty everywhere, not just my countrymen.

No shalom for Israel today, or for us. I look for it, but today is not it.

There is no shalom in defeat.

Mohammed Image Archive

Saturday, May 1st, 2010

Zombie says “South Park is the least of Islam’s problems: The Mohammed Image Archive displays every Mohammed portrait ever created“.

Many of these are from classical sources, many are sympathetic.

Also of interest: the amazing emails and letters from Mohammed’s supporters.

Religion of Peace. Oh, yeah.

Muhammad and Wife

Saturday, April 24th, 2010

Via Ghost of a Flea, a cartoon of the psychopathic cult killer Muhammad and his wife, Aisha. This cartoon was posted around Malmo, Sweden, as a part of a call to halt the growing Islamic influence on Swedish culture. See this article from Islam in Europe. It says the caption on the cartoon reads, “Mohammed with wife, he’s 53, she’s 9. Is this the type of marriage we want to see in Skåne?”

Content warning: Big Mo and Little Aisha are naked in this unappealing and crudely drawn cartoon. If that will offend you for sexual reasons (naked people, including a child), do not click on this link. If, however, it will offend you because you think it is blasphemous, then by all means click the link, see the cartoon, scream in offended fury, and then take a big shit, eat it, recycle, reuse, until until you die.

There is no god, especially not Allah, and Mohammad, may piss be upon him, was no prophet, but a child-molesting mass murderer.

Probably won’t last, but here’s a link to a French blogger brave enough to post a photograph of the original Malmo poster.

Oh, look, even more photos insulting jihadis, their filthy cult leader, and their flimsy, boring, toy god.

Thick as a Brick

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

You pricks.

You tyrant toadies.

You lying, shit sucking jackasses.

OK, OK. Let me calm down enough to type.

[deep breaths]

Just before the recent vote to put Dr. Obama in charge of your body, the rowdy Sipsey Street Irregulars called for a Window War.

Nancy Pelosi’s Intolerable Act is within days of passage by devious means so corrupt and twisted that even members of her own party recoil in disgust.

The majority of the people have made it plain that they do not want this tyrannical transfer of power wrapped in soft lies.

It does not matter.

Pelosi and her ilk apparently do not understand that this Intolerable Act has some folks so angry that they are ready to resist their slow-rolling revolution against the Founders’ Republic by force of arms. Why should they? For in the past seventy-five years of being pushed back continually from the free exercise of our God-given rights to life, liberty and property, WE HAVE NEVER SHOVED BACK. Rather, it was we, the law-abiding, who backed up each time, grumbling.


The Imperial Democrats do not care what you think. They will not hear you. They are every bit as arrogant and isolated as King George the Third was from the liberty-loving American colonists in 1775.

And yet, if we are to avoid civil war, we must get their attention BEFORE the IRS thug parties descend upon us each in turn ….

John Locke said it best:

“Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.”

When the law becomes a deadly tool of tyranny, it is no longer a good thing to be obedient and “law-abiding.” It is, in fact, suicidal.

Yet, given the federal mandarins’ willful ignorance of our very existence and conviction that we have no opinions that they are bound to respect, is there anything that can be done to prevent civil war?

Yes, there is.

We can emulate the Sons of Liberty of old.

We can break their windows.

These windows are not far away from where you are reading this right now. In virtually every city and county in this land, there is a local headquarters of Pelosi’s party — the Democrat party. These headquarters invariably have windows.

[Oh, yes, certainly read the whole thing. Please. Even if you are not willing to go this far, the time fast approaches when you will have to take sides; this is but the merest tasted of the cost that awaits you, whichever side you pick.]

Well, so, it turns out that his call to action has not gone unheeded, and it is spreading. Go to Sipsey Street and just start scrolling.

Or go here. Here’s a good one, in Rochester, NY. The New York Daily News prints a typical Demoncrat response:

“I think the people who do this kind of thing are cowards,” Morelle told me. “I don’t consider this civil disobedience. That’s usually non-violent and you get arrested…There’s legitimate ways to protest. This is frightening. It is crazy and sick. What’s next? We take baseball bats and hit the people we don’t like?”

Why, yes, you moron, if that’s what it takes to get you to listen. You ignored just about every damn poll that’s been taken recently, showing an ever increasing number of Americans despise the shit-smeared punji stake you just shoved up our asses. We’d rather not; we hope to get the message through your windows with a few bricks. But if that doesn’t do it, then yes. As I’ve said, that’s exactly and precisely why we have a Second Amendment, and the right it was intended to protect.

But that’s not what’s driving me bonkers right now. No no no.

What drives me nuts is the various comments I’ve seen equating a brick through the window with terrorism, and calling for the arrest and sentencing of anyone who do such a foul thing under the terrorism statutes. Which is, I guess, par for the course, and merely to be expected.

Until you read this:

Lawfare: Terrorist Who Help Plan 9/11 Attacks Ordered Released
John Adams wept.

A suspected al Qaeda organizer once called “the highest value detainee” at Guantánamo Bay was ordered released by a federal judge in an order issued Monday.

Mohamedou Ould Slahi was accused in the 9/11 Commission report of helping recruit Mohammed Atta and other members of the al Qaeda cell in Hamburg, Germany, that took part in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Military prosecutors suspected Mr. Slahi of links to other al Qaeda operations, and considered seeking the death penalty against him while preparing possible charges in 2003 and 2004.

“They were considering giving him the death penalty. Now they don’t even have enough evidence to pass the test for habeas,” said the attorney, Nancy Hollander, of Albuquerque, N.M.

Why don’t they have evidence against him? Because they used some harsh techniques to get him talk. See they weren’t trying to build a criminal case against him, they were trying to get information about future attacks.

Get it?

American citizens, performing symbolic acts of violence against windows, in protest against against a horrific bill aimed at turning the nation Communist, are terrorists. They must be arrested and jailed.

But the real terrorists, illegal combatants as defined by the Geneva Convention, who kill unarmed men, women, and children, who wish to enslave, convert, or destroy us all, they get let go, because we didn’t accord them and their views enough respect. Because we didn’t play nice enough.

These are the people in power. This is the kind of thinking that just rammed through the Health Care Deform bill.

This is the plan of the man who will soon sign that bill.

Islam: Religion of Pieces

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Trencherbone provides a study guide into how Islam and the Koran works. Dozens of links, organized alphabetically by topic, to other articles extensively quoting the Koran. I’m posting the link because it’s not a quick read; this deserves long, careful study.

This is Islam in its own words, folks, and it’s nasty, violent, toxic filth.

I am a kaffir, an unbeliever, and damn proud of it.

There is no god, particularly not Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, is no prophet, but a child raping, psychotic, mass murderer.

Flyers = Gunnies

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

WizardPC, manning the Walls of the City, points out that the new TSA directives promulgated in the wake of the Christmas Bombing, works in exactly the same way as current gun regulations:

  • Unaccountable Government Agency with the power to ruin your life over seemingly minor transgressions? Check!
  • Assumption that you’re up to no good based solely on lawful activity? Check!

…And three more items. As one of Wiz’s commenters notes, this only applies to international travelers, but come on, people, do you really believe that officials like Napolitano don’t want to impose them universally?

After all, many of our current gun control laws got started after the Civil War, and were only supposed to keep uppity black folk from resisting the KKK and other bastions of law and order; they were never intended to be used against decent white Americans.

If the System Worked…

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

If the system worked, as “Nappies” Napolitano claims, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would not now be in the hands of the Justice Department.

He’d be in military hands, in Guantanomo, and would at this moment be in the process of being persuaded to spill his guts on who supplied him with a defective bomb. He might be allowed to watch with the rest of us as the homes and capitals of those responsible were obliterated. He’d certainly be hearing, and possibly watching, the Current Occupants at Gitmo being shot. Then it would be his turn. They would all have been offered a last meal of pork sausage and beer.

If the system worked, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would never have attempted what he did, because his sponsors would either be dead, or would know better than to attack an American target.

If the system worked, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would indeed be in this country, attending engineering school, being a good student, and preparing to go back home to bring his nation into the modern era.

If the system really worked, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would be going to school in his own country, and that school would be almost as good as almost any place he could have gone to here, and his country would be a substantial economic competitor to the US, like Japan after WWII.

And if the system worked, Barack Hussein Obama would be the junior Senator from Illinois. At best.