Archive for the ‘War on Jihad’ Category

« Older Entries

Islam: Religion of Pieces

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Trencherbone provides a study guide into how Islam and the Koran works. Dozens of links, organized alphabetically by topic, to other articles extensively quoting the Koran. I’m posting the link because it’s not a quick read; this deserves long, careful study.

This is Islam in its own words, folks, and it’s nasty, violent, toxic filth.

I am a kaffir, an unbeliever, and damn proud of it.

There is no god, particularly not Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, is no prophet, but a child raping, psychotic, mass murderer.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Islam, Religion and Superstition, War on Jihad | 1 Comment »

Flyers = Gunnies

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

WizardPC, manning the Walls of the City, points out that the new TSA directives promulgated in the wake of the Christmas Bombing, works in exactly the same way as current gun regulations:

  • Unaccountable Government Agency with the power to ruin your life over seemingly minor transgressions? Check!
  • Assumption that you’re up to no good based solely on lawful activity? Check!

…And three more items. As one of Wiz’s commenters notes, this only applies to international travelers, but come on, people, do you really believe that officials like Napolitano don’t want to impose them universally?

After all, many of our current gun control laws got started after the Civil War, and were only supposed to keep uppity black folk from resisting the KKK and other bastions of law and order; they were never intended to be used against decent white Americans.

Tags:
Posted in B. Hussein Obama, Dammit!, Fighting Back, Government Idiocy, Jihad, Political Correctness, Politics & Politicians, War on Jihad | 2 Comments »

If the System Worked…

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

If the system worked, as “Nappies” Napolitano claims, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would not now be in the hands of the Justice Department.

He’d be in military hands, in Guantanomo, and would at this moment be in the process of being persuaded to spill his guts on who supplied him with a defective bomb. He might be allowed to watch with the rest of us as the homes and capitals of those responsible were obliterated. He’d certainly be hearing, and possibly watching, the Current Occupants at Gitmo being shot. Then it would be his turn. They would all have been offered a last meal of pork sausage and beer.

If the system worked, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would never have attempted what he did, because his sponsors would either be dead, or would know better than to attack an American target.

If the system worked, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would indeed be in this country, attending engineering school, being a good student, and preparing to go back home to bring his nation into the modern era.

If the system really worked, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab would be going to school in his own country, and that school would be almost as good as almost any place he could have gone to here, and his country would be a substantial economic competitor to the US, like Japan after WWII.

And if the system worked, Barack Hussein Obama would be the junior Senator from Illinois. At best.

Tags: , ,
Posted in B. Hussein Obama, Fighting Back, Government Idiocy, Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, War on Jihad | Comments Off

QotD: “The System Worked”

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

Look, this is all over the place. It’s so obviously, blatantly wrong, nobody’s saying anything insightful about it. All you can really do is bug out your eyes and scream incoherently, or just sigh and click on to the next post, or go watch a movie or something.

Ladies and gentlemen, the finest hands your country is in [0:30]

“Baghdad” Janet “Nappies” Napolitano, Head Nanny:

One thing I’d like to point out here is that the system worked. Everybody played an important role here. The passengers and crew of the flight took appropriate action.

Even CNN’s commentator can’t quite keep the disbelief out of her voice. CNN is not playing with The Team on this one.

Some of the passengers did indeed do the right thing, although Nappies and her minions have done everything possible to render the passengers helpless.

Then there’s this:

We have no suggestion that he was improperly screened.

He got on the plane despite being on watch lists and despite warnings from his own family. How is that not “improper screened”?

Cold Fury:

This is never going to work if both the terrorist’s and the Administration’s pants are on fire.

Jonah Goldberg says the obvious about as well as anybody:

It is her basic position that the “system worked” because the bureaucrats responded properly after the attack. That the attack was “foiled” by a bad detonator and some civilian passengers is proof, she claims, that her agency is doing everything right. That is just about the dumbest thing she could say, on the merits and politically.
…
If the White House wants to assure people that it takes the war on terror seriously (a term Robert Gibbs used this morning by the way), they could start by firing this patenly unqualified hack.

Although Goldberg is generous (”patently unqualified hack”), you should read the whole thing; it’s short.

Oh, and I can’t pass over this [0:39]:

Within literally an hour to ninety minutes of the incident occurring, all 128 flights in the air had been notified to take some special measures in light of what had occurred.

When seconds count, TSA is an hour away, at least. With advice, not actual, you know, help.

Goldberg is far too generous. Napolitano, and the administration she is a part of, is not unqualified.

They’re on the other side.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in B. Hussein Obama, Dammit!, Fighting Back, First Responders, Government Idiocy, Immigration, Militia, Political Correctness, War on Jihad | Comments Off

Waterboarding Eric Holder With The Truth

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

Lindsay Graham (R-SC) upbraids Eric Holder over trying KSM in a civilian court:

Scott at Powerline explains why trying KSM in a civilian court is an “Insane Protocol”. He also provides a link to the actual, official policy document. [Since this looks like one of those docs that might change or fall down the memory hole, I've saved it here.]

Andy McCarthy at National Review Online identifies and answers eight lies Holder tells in his testimony.

Let me explain, for those who haven’t been paying attention or doing their homework, the difference between criminal justice and war:

In criminal justice, you seek out the individual responsible for a specific illegal act, and punish that individual for that act accordingly.

In war, you seek to punish an entire nation or other polity for acting in a way you do not like. The purpose is not to punish this or that individual for this or that act, but to bring your enemies to their knees and make them beg you to stop. The technical word for this is surrender, and an honorable victor will accept the surrender and cease making war.

KSM is not an individual committing specific illegal acts who needs to be punished. He is a member of a foreign polity, and a leader within that polity, determined to bring about our surrender. That polity is making war upon us. When we protect its warriors with the safeguards of our justice system, we are bowing down, preparing to surrender.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Bill of Rights, Dammit!, Government Idiocy, Law, Political Correctness, Politics & Politicians, War on Jihad | Comments Off

Purple Hearts For Fort Hood Fallen

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

Roger Kimball makes the case.

Will the soldiers whom Hasan killed or injured in this latest terrorist assault receive the Purple Heart?

In my view, they should. But whether they do depends on how the Obama administration decides to spin the episode. If it determines that the soldiers were victims of criminal assault, the answer is No: they do not get this most somber military decoration.

But if the Obama administration determines that those soldiers were injured or killed in the line of duty, then they are eligible for the Purple Heart. [UPDATE: the always excellent Diana West beat me to the punch with this insightful column about Ft. Hood and the Purple Heart.]

It’s tricky for Obama. His administration is devoted to transforming the jihadist war against the West into a civilian conflict. Hence the heavy odor of political correctness that has hung about Ft. Hood since November 5 when Maj. Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar” and opened fire.

Kimball points to Diana West’s brief, but cogent, post. She says, “Witholding medals to these war dead and wounded is the ultimate act of submission”. It’s an act of submission, alright, but far from the ultimate one.

Worse than the President bowing to foreign potentates, to be sure, but there’s a long hard fall even beyond this, with plenty of bumps and breaks on the way down.Terrible precedent.

Tags: , ,
Posted in B. Hussein Obama, Dammit!, Dhimmis, Fort Hood, Government Idiocy, Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, War on Jihad | Comments Off

“$200 Haircuts on 88-cent Heads”

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Mark Shea, one of many outside the mainstream pointing at the blatantly obvious truth the mainstream insists on not seeing:

One thing you can give our media Chattering Classes: They are utterly consistent. After Major Nidal Malik Hasan opened fire on a roomful of defenseless people in Fort Hood, it was absolutely assured that we would immediately be told that this outrage had nothing to do with his Islamic faith and that it was not an act of terror. Then, as time went on and the bleedin’ obvious became bleedin’ obvious, we would spend all weekend enduring TV pundits scratching the $200 haircuts on their 88-cent heads and pondering the question of whether there might be some remote connection between Islamic belief and a guy who praises Muslim suicide bombers as heroes and martyrs, sits under the teaching of a Radical Islamic imam who praises his act of slaughter as heroic, uses his authority as a psychiatrist to proselytize vulnerable patients with Islamic agitprop, and dresses in traditional Muslim garb and shouts “Allahu akbar!” as he guns down his prey.

It was a spectacular display of deliberate willed stupidity by a media culture that demonstrates repeatedly it does not want to acknowledge that Islam tends to breed such acts of terror with startling frequency. And it was predictable because it happens every time some Islamic butcher opens up on innocent victims in the name of the Prophet.

Well worth your time to read the whole thing.

Shea points at something in particular I’ve been trying to find; more evidence of Hollywood’s cravenness, in particular:

For 2012, Emmerich set his sites on destroying the some biggest landmarks around the world, from Rome to Rio. But there’s one place that Emmerich wanted to demolish but didn’t: the Kaaba, the cube-shaped structure located in the center of Mecca. It’s the focus of prayers and the site of the Hajj, the biggest, most important pilgrimage in Islam.

“Well, I wanted to do that, I have to admit,” the filmmaker told scifiwire.com. “But my co-writer Harald [Kloser] said, ‘I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie.’ And he was right.”

Emmerich went on: “We have to all, in the western world, think about this. You can actually let Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have … a fatwa, and that sounds a little bit like what the state of this world is. So it’s just something which I kind of didn’t [think] was [an] important element, anyway, in the film, so I kind of left it out.”

Traditionally, a fatwa has meant religious opinion by an Islamic scholar or imam. The term has gained currency in the West after Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini issued a death sentence in the form of a fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie for alleged blasphemies in his book “The Satanic Verses” in 1989. As a result, the Indian-born writer was forced into hiding for most of the ’90s.

But noooo, we’re told to believe. “Jihad” just means “a peaceful inner struggle with one’s self”. We’re told, “religion of peace”. We’re told, “selective quotation of scriptures.”

NO. As I always say at this point:

There is no god, not even Allah, and Mohammed, may piss be upon him, was nobody’s prophet, but a child-molesting mass murderer.

And I say that simply because, so far, I can, but I’m beginning to fear the day is coming when I dare not say such things in public.

And when that day comes, you watch: I won’t be able to say that, but anyone will be able to piss on a statue of Christ, or daub the Virgin Mary with shit, and will get public funds to do it.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Bill of Rights, Dammit!, Dhimmis, Fort Hood, Islam, Jihad, Liberals, Media, News Media, War on Jihad | 6 Comments »

Female Police Officer Heroically Wounded….

Friday, November 6th, 2009

… protecting unarmed, defenseless American soldiers being shot on American soil in an American military base by a Muslim jihadist wearing an American uniform, sworn to save lives as doctor, and sworn to defend the Constitution as a soldier himself, but mostly sworn to kill those who kill the followers of Allah.
alg_kimberly_munley

Kimberly Munley, thank you for stopping this outrageous attack.

Officer Munley, you were the hero of the day yesterday. Whatever a skeptic’s prayers may be worth, you have mine. You certainly have my admiration and gratitude, as well as the gratitude of the soldiers and families who were spared further grief by your bravery.

Well done. Very well done indeed.

[This story subject to change as real reporters get out the details that the entertainment media of CNN, MSNBC, AP, and so forth, are frantically trying to hide.]

Tags: ,
Posted in Cops, Dammit!, Dhimmis, Fighting Back, Government Idiocy, Jihad, Military, News Media, Political Correctness, War, War on Jihad | 1 Comment »

“Who’s On First?” At The State Department

Sunday, July 5th, 2009

Via Protein Wisdom and Powerline, Anne Bayefsky brings this scary funny briefing from The Big O’s Department of State:

Ian Kelly, State Department Spokesman, Daily Press Briefing, Washington, DC

TRANSCRIPT: June 30, 2009, 12:37 p.m. EDT

QUESTION: On Iran, now that the Guardian Council has announced its decision and announced Ahmadinejad as the final winner with even more votes than before, is that enough for the U.S. Government, or are you still going to wait and see what happens on the street and by the opposition?

MR. KELLY: …as the Secretary said yesterday, we’re very concerned about what’s happening in Iran…And I think this process still has to play out.

QUESTION: Well, what are you waiting – what are you waiting to play out? …

MR. KELLY: I’m not quite sure I understand what you mean by what are we waiting for.

QUESTION: Well, you say you’re waiting for it to play out. I mean, I’m just unclear what specifically you’re waiting for?….

QUESTION: What is it that hasn’t played out?

MR. KELLY: I think that there are – that the Iranian Government still has to take some action…

QUESTION: Well, I know, but –

***

MR. KELLY: In addition, we don’t see that they’ve addressed the concerns of the international community about their nuclear program. So we’re still waiting for some actions.

QUESTION: Well, but – I know. I mean, you could wait indefinitely for some actions, but just kind of –

MR. KELLY: Well, maybe we – I hope we don’t.

QUESTION: But – okay, but, I mean, at what point do you say there will be consequences if you don’t see some actions? …

MR. KELLY: Well, you know what the Secretary said yesterday. I mean, we’re going to – we are going to make decisions and base our actions on the national interests of the United States. We have…concerns …about Iran’s nuclear program, and we’re going to just continue to raise these concerns until we see that action is taken.

QUESTION: Well, …don’t you think that’s inconsistent with “we’re going to do what’s in the best interests of our national security interests regardless?”

MR. KELLY: I just – you’re asking us to take actions. I don’t think –

QUESTION: …I’m asking if you’re going to recognize President Ahmadinejad as the legitimate government that you will be – that you say you want to deal with in – on your other national security interests.

MR. KELLY: …[L]egitimacy of any government derives from the consent of the governed. I think that we’ve always had concerns about the political process in Iran…We will make decisions on that based on our dealings with Iran, based on our national interests. We think, right now, that this internal situation needs to play out.

QUESTION: Sorry, can I follow up? But it has played out. The Guardian Council has said –

MR. KELLY: I don’t think it’s played out.

QUESTION: — Ahmadinejad has – so what are you waiting for? You’re waiting for him to be sworn in?

MR. KELLY: Okay. I’ll say it again. We’re waiting for Iran to take some action.

QUESTION: What kind of action?

MR. KELLY: Well, they need to address the concerns of the international community.

QUESTION: But that’s separate from the election.

MR. KELLY: I know it’s separate from the election. We –

***

QUESTION: So at what point do you decide that you’re going to deal with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?

MR. KELLY: Well, we haven’t reached that point yet. We will reach that point when – I mean, we’ve laid out exactly what we think needs to happen in the P-5+1. Javier Solana has invited Iran to participate. We have said that we will participate…

***

QUESTION: It’s a bit confusing. You are saying that you are going to recognize Ahmadinejad when they decide –

MR. KELLY: Did I say that?

QUESTION: — when they decide they will attend this P-5+1 meeting. I don’t see the relationship.

MR. KELLY: Look…the situation is still evolving in Iran…When and if the Iranians respond to the concerns of the international community and decide to abide by their responsibilities under their agreements –

QUESTION: Then –

MR. KELLY: — we will make our decisions based on our national interests.

It reads like an Onion parody, but no. This is actual national policy, as established by people who think they’re better able than we are to run our lives. We need their help, they insist, and yet they’ll let a tyrant like Ahmadinejad stomp his own people into bloody mud.

Posted in B. Hussein Obama, Dammit!, Dhimmis, Government Idiocy, Jihad, Press, War, War on Jihad | Comments Off

Uppity Jews

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

You know, if those damn Jews would just take a clue from the peace loving Palestinians whose land they’re squatting on and start blowing themselves up in markets and pizza parlors to make their points, we’d take them a lot more seriously.

I mean, how dare they demand that their countrymen take their stupid religious ideas seriously?

Ultra-orthodox Jews clash with police over a parking garage being opened on the Sabbath.

Ultra-orthodox Jews clash with police.

Raise your hand, everybody who thinks it’s OK for bus drivers to stop in the middle of their route so they can get out, spread a prayer rug, and kneel towards Mecca. Religious freedom, and all.

(Oh, and those ridiculous fur hats! They should try turbans or table cloths, much more civilized.)

Remember, folks: This is taking place in Israel, where Judaism is the official state religion. It makes perfect sense to me that Jews should be able to impose their religious restrictions on public life there. Wouldn’t like to see it here, mind. But I live in a country where state religions are specifically prohibited.

One last thought:
Something’s nagging me about the photos on the original site. For some reason, most of them look static, staged, particularly the ones with protesters and cops. All very well posed, very well lit, good color, very clean.

I am not an expert, I could well be wrong. It may just be that the photographer was very, very good.

I hope I’m wrong. If these did turn out to be fake, it would hurt the Israeli cause far worse than worse fakes hurt the Muslims.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Dammit!, Dhimmis, Photography, Political Correctness, Religion and Superstition, War on Jihad | Comments Off

« Older Entries