Archive for the ‘Religion and Superstition’ Category

Why I Can Not Mock

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

I doubt that I will ever believe, as Elizabeth Scalia does, in the God she professes her faith to. I don’t think I can.

But as I have said before, there is a profound and beautiful core of truth to what the Anchoress believes, and I read her every day for the glimpses she vouchsafes us of that beauty.

In a former parish, there was a sister-liturgist who–eager to promote “sensitivity”–decided that the Gloria should be sung with the refrain “Glory to God in the Highest, and peace to God’s people on earth;” she was content to brutalize the ear, change a liturgical prayer that is not supposed to be changed, and disorient the people just a tad, in order that no one should be subjected to that troubling male pronoun, “His.”

I always thought it was a nonsensical point; why go to the trouble of training the people to avoid the “His” in that sung prayer, when it proceed to refer to God as “Heavenly King, Almighty God and Father,” and to Jesus as “only Son of the Father.” And of course, I got into a civil debate with her about it.

“You don’t understand,” she said kindly (because she was a very kind sister) “it’s important that we begin to think of God as having no gender at all, containing aspects of both mother and father, but not limited to our understanding as “Father.”

“Yes, mysticism if fine; I’m a fan,” I said. “But the prayer–which is liturgical and not subject for editing by you or me–makes enough male references throughout that it seems incongruous and silly, to enforce this clumsy and cold “Glory to God and peace to God’s people,” phrasing. It’s ick to my ear. And it puts God at a distance; it’s not intimate.”

To sister’s credit she remained kind but she did buckle down and let me know she wasn’t budging. “There are a lot of people in the world who have had bad fathers, they have bad memories, a lot of people find referring to God as “Father” to be distancing and hurtful. They cannot relate.”

“Well, sister, I happen to be one of those people who had a bad father and carries bad memories, and I like referencing God as Father; I happen to find great comfort and solace in having a Heavenly Father who more than fills the void left by my earthly one.”

She looked stunned. “You are the first person who has ever said that to me; that is not the usual perspective.”

“But don’t you think that’s a perspective worth promoting? Isn’t it a much better thing to tell people whose fathers have failed that they may be consoled by a Father who will never fail? Wouldn’t that be more positive, and ultimately more healing, than wrecking the liturgy to pander to neurotic sadness?”

Read it all.

This is why I continue to read Scalia, but have given up on, say, P.Z. Meyers. There is a profound and beautiful truth to what Meyers teaches as well, a truth arrived at by pathways easier for me to follow than the one illuminated by Scalia, a path that rejects the rigor of faith for a sharper, narrower rigor of another kind. But somehow, somewhere, Meyers has lost sight of that beauty, and has long ago ceased to teach his audience how to find it.

Instead, he wastes his time and talents mocking people like the Anchoress…and, yes, I see much to be mocked about them. I no longer care. Their various blindnesses and failings are trivial compared to their beauties and truths, which science cannot address, and may never be able to address — it is simply not the right tool to do so.

Not at all incidentally, I mind myself of Eric S. Raymond’s definition of “truth” , that truth is what makes the future less surprising. In what sense, you may then reasonably ask, do the Anchoress’ “truths” make the future less surprising? How may her words be unpacked as predictions?

I admit, I’m still struggling with how to express that. But in general, I think that people who think and believe as the Anchoress does are more likely to be, for lack of a better word, decent.

QotD: Humility and Hubris

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Just something I needed to make a note of:

Two things, however, are clear about any religion that might derive from cybernetics and systems theory, ecology and natural history. First, that in the asking of questions, there will be no limit to our hubris; and second, that there shall always be humility in our acceptance of answers. In these two characteristics we shall be in sharp contrast with most of the religions of the world. They show little humility in their espousal of answers but great fear about the questions they will ask.

Gregory Bateson, Angels Fear

Sacred and Profane

Sunday, July 25th, 2010

Via the Anchoress:
This, written about 155 AD (three digits, not four), strikes me, an unbeliever, with its simplicity and directness. We humans, I think, have a need for worship, and this is surely one of the best directions for doing so.

“The memoirs of the disciples”. “President”. This is the statement of those for whom all this was new, only three or four generations removed. Christ’s presence is not long out of living memory. Terms must be defined, or have not yet been settled on. (For some reason, I read “President” as “Preside-ent”, he who presides. It’s notable that this person is not referred to as a priest.)

Via Ghost of a Flea:

A “balrog” is a fell monster from The Lord of the Rings; one of them fought with the wizard Gandalf, and almost succeeded in killing him.

The Rationalist’s Harry Potter

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

[update]
AAAaaarrrrrrrgggghhhhh!

I just read the last chapter — and it’s not finished yet! I have to wait for Yukowsky to write more chapters!

I hope he’s doing more on a regular basis. Do not start reading this unless you are a masochist.

Yudkowsky, please stop wasting your time doing stupid stuff like trying to figure out how to give AIs a sense of ethics.

Finish the damn story!
[/update]

Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality, by Eliezer Yudkowsky.

Via Eric S. Raymond. It’s useless quoting from the story itself, so let me just give you Raymond’s review:

Oh Thoth Trismegistus, oh Ma’at, oh Ganesha, oh sweet lady Eris…I have not laughed so hard in years!

Eliezer Yudkowsky is one of the brightest people I’ve ever met in a lifetime of seeking out gifted- to genius-grade thinkers because people who aren’t usually bore me pretty quickly. Eliezer has spent years studying the deep structure of rationality and probably understands the systematic sources of bias and irrationality in the shared architecture of the human mind as comprehensively as anyone alive. I have previously commented on some of his writings.

Usually Eliezer thinks about questions like how to build human-compatible ethical reasoning into AIs. Serious, deep stuff. When he turns the vast and imponderable force of his intellect to writing, of all things, Harry Potter fanfic, a quite unexpected degree of hilarity ensues.

Read it and laugh. Read it and learn. Eliezer re-invents Harry Potter as a skeptic genius who sets himself the task of figuring out just how all this “magic” stuff works. The science is real – it really would be a lot harder to explain transformation from a human into a cat than mere levitation, for example. When Harry, confronted with a magical time-travel device, is immediately terrified that he might be holding an antimatter bomb, this is actually a more justified fear than many readers may understand.

But the characters are not slighted. Eliezer is very good at giving them responses to the rather altered and powered-up Harry that are consistent with canon. The development of Minerva McGonagall is particularly fine.

Strongly recommended. And if you manage to learn about sources of cognitive bias like the Planning Fallacy and the Bystander Effect (among others) while your sides are hurting with laughter, so much the better.

It helps if you have some familiarity with the Potter cycle, but since that is itself a mish-mash of traditional child’s fantasy, you probably will recognize most what’s being built on here.

And it’s what’s being built that you need to read anyway. Gods, I wish I’d this when I was twelve.


No, wait: one quote from the story:

…It is a sad rule that whenever you are most in need of your art as a rationalist, that is when you are most likely to forget it.

Christian Violence: Tavis Smiley

Sunday, June 13th, 2010

Joe Hicks over at Pajamas Media highlights an interview with Hirsi Ali, who “fled a traditional Muslim life in Somalia, a life that included being the victim of female genital mutilation as a child, and eventually made her way to the Netherlands where she rejected Islam and literally underwent an intellectual awakening. She now lives in America.” Ali is under a death threat fatwa for her work with slain filmmaker Theo Van Gogh on Submission, which exposes Islam’s vile misogyny.

The interviewer was Tavis Smiley of PBS. You can watch the interview here.

It’s also important to know that Hirsi Ali lives under the constant watch of security guards, since her life continues to be threatened by Islamic extremists.

This was the woman who walked onto Tavis Smiley’s PBS show to promote her new book. Nomad calls on key institutions of the West — universities, feminists, and Christian churches — to wage a war of ideas against Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism.

However, Smiley was in no mood to hear Hirsi Ali’s arguments that placed Islam in a bad light. He wanted to assert the old leftist claim that Islam is always and everywhere “a religion of peace.”

Look at this jaw-dropping exchange between Smiley and Hirsi Ali:

Smiley: But Christians do that every single day in this country. …

Ali: Do they blow people up every single day?

Smiley: Yes, Christians. Every day, people walk into post offices, they walk into schools, that’s what Columbine — I mean I could do this all day long. There’s so many more examples of Christians — and I happen to be a Christian — that’s back to this notion of you idealizing Christianity to my read. There’s so many more examples, Ayaan, of Christians who do that than you could ever give me examples of Muslims who have done that inside this country where you live and work.

Beyond the irritating liberal arrogance is the complete ignorance of the facts involved here.
Let’s ignore momentarily the dozens of terror plots — all designed and organized by Muslim-Americans — that have been uncovered and thwarted by this nation’s security forces. I will instead direct Smiley’s attention to these attacks against Americans:

  • 1993: The World Trade Center bombing in New York killed 6 people.
  • 1996: The Khobar Towers bombing killed 20 and wounded 372.
  • 1998: The bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania left 224 dead and 4,000 injured.
  • 2001: On 9/11, 19 hijackers flew planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 perished.
  • 2009: U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan shot and killed 13 at Texas’ Fort Hood.
  • 2010: Faisal Shahzad attempted to detonate a car bomb in Times Square.

Uh, where’s a similar listing of Christian-inspired acts of violence, Mr. Smiley? The sweeping ignorance, or political blindness, of Smiley’s claim that “Christians do that (commit acts of terror) every single day in this country” is nothing short of astounding.

Unlike Islam, Christian scripture does not guarantee paradise to those who kill in the name of their faith. But the Koran does offer the fruits of paradise to “those who kill for Allah.” Suicide bombers have been lured to their deaths with this promise and the offer that they will be free from the fires of hell if they kill an infidel and, in the process, die.

[My emphasis.]

That last, right there, is the key that makes Islam so toxic. Even turn-the-other-cheek, meek-inheriting-the-earth Christianity can be perverted to excuse violence in its name, but Mohammed actively encouraged it, and led Muslim armies against the infidels in his own time.

Nevertheless, let me for a moment be the devil’s advocate.

First, if you want the list of Christian terrorist acts here in America, look up abortion clinic bombings and murders. However, note that these acts are committed not to force the Christian faith on others, but because the anti-abortionists believe that a wholesale murder of innocents is taking place. I happen not to agree with that, although it’s a close call, but if I did, I hope that I too would be doing everything in my power to stop it. Not to terrorize, mind, but to directly disrupt a human slaughterhouse. I hope I’d do the same against guard barracks in Nazi concentration camps or Soviet gulags or, um, Save The Earth re-education camps, should they ever come to pass.

Outside of America, look at Northern Ireland. However, while that conflict has a religious cast to it, the underlying conflict is one for political independence. It’s ugly as hell, and the actions involved are totally unjustified, but it’s not a war of religious expansion.

I’ll also note that both clinic bombings and the Irish fight have died down considerably in recent years. The practitioners have either fallen to attrition, or realized they were not getting the kind of sympathy they hoped for.

Second, although I don’t have a list to hand, I think there have been many nut jobs who do commit horrible crimes in the name of Christianity. Thing is, they are nut jobs, acting in direct contravention of the scriptures they cite, and they do not remotely have the support of mainstream Christian clerics.

Finally, undoubtedly many Christians do commit ordinary crimes, but not in the name of Christ — the Roman Catholic Mafioso is a classic stereotype. However, the attraction of this stereotype in fiction is precisely the huge disconnect between the professed faith and the daily life.

“Uh, how about the Spanish Inquisition? Galileo, dude!” The Inquisition was indeed brutal, but it was only carried out against other Christians, not as a weapon of evangelism against other faiths. And even the Catholic Church eventually realized that the Inquisition was not only against scripture, but counterproductive in practice, actually turning people away from the faith. It forced Western Civilization to grow the hell up.

The Islamic Jihad is the only longstanding and still very much active, program of violence against non-coreligionists, is strongly rooted in scripture, and is endorsed, advocated, and managed by the highest ranks of the Muslim clergy. It spreads an oppressive creed of utter intolerance towards the highest ideals of classical liberal, and even neo-liberal, political ideology. (Except statism. Neo-liberals love them their statism.)

And it is vastly more promiscuously lethal than the anti-abortionists, or even the Irish Republican Army, ever dreamed of being.

Smiley here is covering for evil on the largest scale. He is not hiding Nazis in his attic, he’s openly shilling for them.

He calls himself a Christian, but in fact is calling for the eradication of the faith he claims to serve.

Shame.

Homeland

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

In a screed at American Thinker against Rosie O’Donnell, Eileen F. Toplansky lays out the facts concerning Jews “returning” to their “homelands” in Germany, Poland, and elsewhere.

The Jewish homeland is, in fact, Israel, and has been “since time immemorial”:

There are archaeological remains that attest to this fact. The holy books of the Jews and the Arabs also confirm this. So Jews don’t have to go back home ~ they are already home. The Jews in Europe, Asia, and America are in the Diaspora because they were summarily expelled from countries throughout the ages. The term “wandering Jew” comes from the historical facts that Jews were expelled from England in 1290; from France in 1393; from Berne, Switzerland in 1427; and from Spain in 1492, to name only a few places.

In her book From Time Immemorial: The Origins of the Arab-Jewish Conflict Over Palestine, author Joan Peters, proves with historical data and other archival information that Jews did not displace Arabs in Palestine-just the reverse: Arabs displaced Jews. In fact, the blurb of this 1984 book relates that:

A hidden but major Arab migration and immigration took place into areas settled by Jews in pre-Israel Palestine; that a substantial number of the Arab refugees called Palestinians in reality had foreign roots; that for every Arab refugee who left Israel in 1948; there was a Jewish refugee who fled or was expelled from his Arab birthplace at the same time. . . .

Recently, filmmaker Pierre Rehov created the film entitled “The Silent Exodus” about these Jews who were kicked out of their Middle Eastern homes. Between 1946 and 1974, there were a million of forgotten Jewish fugitives expelled from the Arab world. These Jews had been living in Arab lands for thousands of years but their homes were stolen from them; they literally had nothing but the clothes on their backs when they fled. They were received in Israel. They did not remain refugees; they had no special United Nations agency to assist them. Israel welcomed them and they rebuilt their lives.


Related, and linked here for reference, “Genetic Evidence Shows Common Origins of Jews“, by David Bernstein at the Volkh Conspiracy. From The New York Times:

Jewish communities in Europe and the Middle East share many genes inherited from the ancestral Jewish population that lived in the Middle East some 3,000 years ago, even though each community also carries genes from other sources — usually the country in which it lives.

But note this comment by Bernstein:

I don’t think that Zionism, etc., depends on whether Jews really have common genetic origins or not, anymore than Palestinian identity is any more or less real depending on whether, as some claim, a large percentage of “Palestinian Arabs” had immigrated rather recently from other countries in the Middle East. But I do think that manipulating history for ideological purposes is bad…

I Eat Shoe Leather

Friday, June 11th, 2010

Awhile back I credited the administration for its (rather half-hearted) support of Israel in the wake of the Hamas terrorist aid flotilla.

I just hate being stupid. Stupid and gullible. What the hell was I thinking?

…[The] administration intends to support an effort next week at the United Nations to set up an independent commission, under UN auspices, to investigate Israel’s behavior in the Gaza flotilla incident. The White House has apparently shrugged off concerns from elsewhere in the U.S. government that a) this is an extraordinary singling out of Israel, since all kinds of much worse incidents happen around the world without spurring UN investigations; b) that the investigation will be one-sided, focusing entirely on Israeli behavior and not on Turkey or on Hamas; and c) that this sets a terrible precedent for outside investigations of incidents involving U.S. troops or intelligence operatives as we conduct our own war on terror.

While UN Ambassador Susan Rice is reported to have played an important role in pushing for U.S. support of a UN investigation, the decision is, one official stressed, of course the president’s.

William Kristol at The American Standard, via The Flea, who also posts a reference to the scorching Psalm 41:9:

9 Even my close friend, whom I trusted,
he who shared my bread,
has lifted up his heel against me.

and comments:

The election of Barack Obama to the Presidency was a greater defeat than Pearl Harbor.

Jannissaries

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

Daniel Greenfield:

Every major war we have fought since Vietnam has been a proxy war for Muslims. Whether we were bombing Saddam on behalf of the royals of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, or bombing our former allies in Yugoslavia on behalf of Muslim Albanians, or dying in order to provide electrical generators to downtown Baghdad and ferry schoolteachers into Kabul. We have not fought a single significant war since Vietnam that was not on behalf of, or intended to benefit Muslims. Not a single one. The Ottoman Empire had a name for this. It was Janissary.

It is only common sense to say that people who act like slaves, are slaves.

via the Flea, who observes:

The analogy is far from perfect. If the West provides Jannissary slave warriors for the sheiks then we should expect to take over their figurative-Ottoman Empire presently. Hardly the worst case scenario.

Jew-Hating Liberal Gorgon Resigns

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Helen Thomas, who revealed her true heart to the world by saying that the Jews in Israel needed to go back to Germany, Poland, and wherever else they came from, has resigned.

Thanks to feelthy Joooo Rabbi David Nesenoff for having captured her vile poison on his flip-cam. Gonna have to get me one of those.

As many have said, this remark exposed a long and fiercely held prejudice, one which was tolerated by her fellow reporters because in their true hearts, they agreed with her.

Some have expressed regret that her long career ends in such ignominy, just shy of her ninetieth year.

It should have ended long ago. All of her work should now be seen in the glaring light cast by Rabbi Nesenoff.

It’s all of the same cloth, all from the same inkpot, off the same ribbon. Every word.

You can die now, Helen, — but frankly, I hope you live a long time, alone, reviled and hated as you so richly deserve. You did huge damage to the nation and profession that sheltered you.

It speaks poorly of her peers at Hearst that she was allowed to resign; she should have been fired.


helenthomasbyebye

Drudge front page, via KisP.


Everybody’s Favorite Cute and Cuddly Mustelid:

Ding Dong: …you’d better BELIEVE the left had to purge her fast, lest we wonder how many of them agree with her.

Follow the link for Weasel’s perfect graphic.

And of course, those of us who have been paying attention for the last nine or ten years know that they all agree with her to some degree. She’s just the first pus to squirt out of the abscess, is all. Gods know it’s long overdue for lancing.


And, dag nab it, I can’t find the link, but someone’s noted that it’s wrong to suggest that HT’s comment is as bad as encouraging blacks to return to Africa. It’s far worse. Blacks did indeed come from Africa, but Israel is the Jewish homeland, and has been since the flight from Egypt. The only reason they’re in all those other places was the Diaspora, being driven from Israel by the Babylonians and from Judea by the Roman Empire.

If any people has the right to occupy a given land, it would be the Jews in Israel.


No sooner do I post the above update, but I come across this from Billy Beck, as always striking his own path with the strict theodolite of principle:

Let me point out that I, too, have urged the Jews to leave Israel. They should come to America. This is the land for them. Among the matters that their culture has been known for across all their history is their grasp of money as technology: concepts put to work on material life. Nowhere in the world has there ever been such a home for such a thing as this one. This was an element of America when “the New World” was still a only gaseous dream of scripture.

I am, cautiously and with great respect, going to disagree on this point. I like there being at least one other place on the planet populated by people who think like this, and I love it that it’s one of the most successful outposts of capitalism, even though, or even because, it is “in the middle of hundreds of millions of howling savages specifically intent on bringing them to ghastly murder”. No bigger “Fuck You!” to the dark evil of Islamic ignorance and hatred can I imagine.

I agree with Beck in that I want our foreign aid to stop going there, but then, I want to stop foreign aid to just about everywhere. Either produce something we need and set a fair price, find another market for your crap, or be taken over by someone else who gets it.

Foreign aid ruined Africa, turned it into a bloody abattoir, and the Islamic Middle East’s been driven insane by profits from an industry it doesn’t understand and didn’t establish.

Israel, I’m convinced, has been weakened by the Socialist cancer precisely because it didn’t have to stand on its own. It might have needed a little pump priming, but the time for that is long past. Now all they need is a strong ally to take their backs against the savages.

I don’t want America to be the only capitalist nation; I want that idea to spread. I want America to face strong competitors, because that’s how we will grow stronger.

Bravo Israel, I say: I don’t believe they deserve the land because a non-existent God gave it to them, but because unlike their neighbors, they clawed an actual, modern nation out of a hell of sand. They earned it, and if they want to stay there, more power to them.


Yet another update:

And yet again, I don’t know where I saw this:

HT is being lauded for her confrontational questioning. However, that’s only because, whoever she confronted, she attacked from the socialist left.

Nobody who attacked from the right would have been allowed to remain in the press corps. There have been a few conservative members, but compared to Thomas, they’ve been models of polite deference.

“Wake Up And Rub Those Sleepy Eyes”

Saturday, June 5th, 2010

Pat Condell sounds the call over — I gag at having to write this — the proposed and approved giant, triumphal Cordoba Mosque to be built near the World Trade Center site:

My comment at Youtube:

Pat Condell, Speaker of Truth.

I don’t give a burning shit about the tolerant, peaceful Muslims out there, because they’re not trying to convert, enslave, or kill me.

It’s the radical ones that worry me, and they’re the ones behind the Cordoba Mosque and the evil terrorism it celebrates.

You can build your Cordoba Mosque when I, a faithless kafir, can visit Mecca; when Jews can build a synagogue in Riyadh; when Catholics can build a cathedral in Tehran.
Till then, piss off.

[update]
via David Horowitz:
Towering-Over-Islam-4-blog[click for full size]

And via the Jawa Report, we learn that

Bülent Yildirim, the main organizer of the Gaza Flotilla, explained at a Hamas rally in Gaza that the operation was no humanitarian effort but part of a global Jihad to overthrow governments and install Islamist dictatorships.He made no secret of that fact, as shown in the MEMRI translation and video.

Keep in mind as you read this that his group originated the project and was the main funder, that his followers controlled the biggest ship, and that they were most of those who attacked the Israeli soldiers. Thus, more than any other individual, Yildirim represents the thinking behind the operation, its direction, and the organization of a militarized group that started the violence in order to achieve the intended result. Notice, too, that he–and thus the organizers of the operation and those who created the violence–are totally indifferent to the loss of life they cause[...]

Their goal is not to succor the people of Gaza but to wipe out Israel and kill the Jews as “rightful” (his words, not mine) successors to Muhammad in continuing this task.

Read the whole thing at the Gloria Center.

All you people barking at Israel for defending itself, this is what you support: the total eradication, not just of Israel, but of the Jews themselves.

And once those damn filth Jews are out of the way, everyone else in the dar al-Harb, the House of War. That would be you and me, infidel kufir.

Finally, a comment on the Cordoba Islamic center. I can’t find the source, but it suggested that an interfaith center be built on the proposed Islamic center site. Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus — all the major world religions would be represented, and have a common ground to work out their common goals philosophies. I’m reminded of the the Orange Catholic Bible Frank Herbert wrote about in Dune. [wipes hopeful teardrop from cheek.] Surely, since understanding and harmony is said to be the aim the Cordoba center, there can be no better way than to house all the religions as equals under one roof, yes?

Oh, wait: Muslims > Jews, Muslims > Christians, Muslims >>>> than Hindus, Buddhists, etc. No, that could never work. All must submit.

Nevermind.