Archive for the ‘Cops’ Category

“Trepanazine” Needs a PDR Writeup, Stat

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

So, your friendly neighborhood Ambulance Driver describes a malady for which “220 grains of Trepanazine” is the recommended treatment regimen.

You arrive on the scene for the unconscious male lying in the roadway, cruise slowly past the police cars blocking traffic, and without even getting out of your ambulance, you roll down the window and bark, “Leon! Get your ignorant ass outta the road! Someone runs over you, you might damage a perfectly good car!”

And not only does Leon obediently cease being an impediment to traffic flow, he also hobbles meekly to your ambulance and climbs aboard. You should have seen the face of the cops who called us.

Which is indeed educational, but WTF is “Trepanazine”? A Google search turns up no dosing info, no link to the manufacturer, no….Oh, wait.

“Trepanazine” as in “trepanning“, right? Drilling a hole in the skull to let out the evil spirits, or “remove the stone of madness”?
trepanning-Hieronymus_Bosch_053-w

Slight risk of lead poisoning with the dosage I believe AD refers to.

And I note that the 230 grain dose for close-range injection is far more common than 220 grains.
bullet45acp-w

Showing Up

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

Officer Krupke from Cop’n'attitude did. No, nothing special. Just showed up, did his eighteen hour shift, and went home.

When some of his fellow officers, “including supervisors”, decided to stay home behind the snow, he’s ticked at his department for reasons he didn’t go into, and the Days Inn he stayed at close to his station ripped him off.

Sometimes the simple stuff needs to be recognized, and this is one of those times. Thanks, Officer. And thanks to all the cops, firefighters, and medics who went out in the cold and snow and did what needed to be done.

The Power to License a Right Is the Power to Destroy It

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

The First Circuit has upheld the power of Massachusetts police to draw on and arrest a concealed carry license holder and seize his weapon even after he has displayed his license, because there is no mechanism to confirm the license is valid.

Understand: the police can threaten and arrest a law abiding citizen for exercising a Constitutionally protected right, a right he has, in addition, gone through considerable trouble to license, including the training so often demanded by citizen control fanatics like the Brady Campaign and Violence Policy Center.

He’s jumped through all the hoops, and still faces violent arrest and confiscation by an office who lectures him that he is “the only person allowed to carry a weapon on his beat”.

The case stems from a lawyer who sued a police officer after he was detained for lawfully carrying a concealed weapon while in possession of a license to carry concealed. According to the case opinion, the lawyer, Greg Schubert, had a pistol concealed under his suit coat, and Mr. Schubert was walking in what the court described as a “high crime area.” At some point a police officer, J.B. Stern, who lived up to his last name, caught a glimpse of the attorney’s pistol, and he leapt out of his patrol car “in a dynamic and explosive manner” with his gun drawn, pointing it at the attorney’s face.

Officer Stern “executed a pat-frisk,” and Mr. Schubert produced his license to carry a concealed weapon. He was disarmed and ordered to stand in front of the patrol car in the hot sun. At some point, the officer locked him in the back seat of the police car and delivered a lecture. Officer Stern “partially Mirandized Schubert, mentioned the possibility of a criminal charge, and told Schubert that he (Stern) was the only person allowed to carry a weapon on his beat.”

For most people, this would be enough to conclude that they were being harassed for the exercise of a constitutional right, but the officer went further, seizing the attorney’s pistol and leaving with it. Officer Stern reasoned that because he could not confirm the “facially valid” license to carry, he would not permit the attorney to carry. Officer Stern drove away with the license and the firearm, leaving the attorney unarmed, dressed in a suit, and alone in what the officer himself argued was a high crime area.

In effect, this ruling means that a concealed carry license — or any license, really — does not confer the protection of the law on the licensed activity, does not protect even the presumption of innocence, but merely protects you against charges actually being filed, and against conviction. Any suppressive action short of that is permissible.

“Shall not be infringed”. How the bloody hell is this not “infringement”?

New Trial For Cory Maye

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Excellent news via Radly Balko at Reason.

Decision (which nobody seems to have read yet) here.

His original conviction, for defending himself and his infant child from a home invader who turned out to be a cop on a wrong-house raid, is a travesty. I certainly hope justice is served this time, and I hope cops everywhere take away the message busting down doors in the middle of the night is a desperation move, not something you do for small enough quantities of drugs that they can be flushed.

And most especially, that cops begin to get it that a “dynamic entry” against the wrong damn house is not ever in accordance with “proper procedure”.

In a nation ruled by armed citizens, it is quite properly asking for an instantaneous and righteous death sentence for the officers involved. When it happens it is utterly and completely the fault of the officers involved. Period. You better read the damn warrant, and check the address twice, because you are betting your life on it.

Female Police Officer Heroically Wounded….

Friday, November 6th, 2009

… protecting unarmed, defenseless American soldiers being shot on American soil in an American military base by a Muslim jihadist wearing an American uniform, sworn to save lives as doctor, and sworn to defend the Constitution as a soldier himself, but mostly sworn to kill those who kill the followers of Allah.
alg_kimberly_munley

Kimberly Munley, thank you for stopping this outrageous attack.

Officer Munley, you were the hero of the day yesterday. Whatever a skeptic’s prayers may be worth, you have mine. You certainly have my admiration and gratitude, as well as the gratitude of the soldiers and families who were spared further grief by your bravery.

Well done. Very well done indeed.

[This story subject to change as real reporters get out the details that the entertainment media of CNN, MSNBC, AP, and so forth, are frantically trying to hide.]

A Cop Who Gets It

Saturday, October 17th, 2009

Second City Cop weighs in on his asshole colleagues who forced a suspect to pose with them after his arrest:

We have yet to see even a tiny argument that makes any sort of sense.

  • Policy to take photos of a prisoner? In a controlled environment for booking and ID purposes. This wasn’t that.
  • Mass arrest? Of one person? You’ve got to be joking.
  • The prisoner was a willing participant? Try running that one by the Supreme Court. You’ve already restricted his movement, you think the Court is going to say he had any sort of freedom at all? Not likely.
  • No time on the job hair-gels did it all? Not even close.
  • You never did anything stupid so you must be a pussy copper? We never denied doing anything stupid – but we were wise enough to not take pictures of it and smart enough to learn from others’ mistakes. Who doesn’t know about cameras everywhere? Especially in a strange city?
  • If everyone keeps their mouth shut, they’ll never find out? Two shifts of coppers, in a known intersection, with an actual arrest that has some one’s name on the report somewhere? Stevie Wonder could pick that platoon out.

SCC also supports McDonalds’ Second Amendment incorporation argument against many of his superiors, up to and including Hizzoner Daley,

SSC, you’ve said some things that make me nervous, but this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are an honest principled citizen. Thank you for stepping up.

“In Accord With the Operational Plan”

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

From David Codrea’s War on Guns:

San Mateo police detective tripped, accidentally shot man in heart

By virtue of his magic “Only One” status, this idiot is deemed more fit to carry a gun than you or I. And not just any gun, but a submachine gun! You know, a weapon of war designed only to kill as many people as quickly as possible.

And naturally, he:

…will not face criminal charges…

Why, you might ask? Because:

The actions of the San Mateo Police Department were in accord with the operational plan and the actions of Detective Rodenspiel were consistent with the training he received in SWAT operations.

See? Like magic! And it doesn’t even matter if we know how the trick was done.

As we like to say in these cases, imagine if an unbadged citizen committed the same, stupid mistake. Imagine if it were an Only One who got shot.

“The police are the public, and the public are the police.” Uh, huh. Sure, Bobby. You betcha.

News story here.

My New Standard For “Poorly Conceived”

Monday, October 12th, 2009

“This Doesn’t Even Work in Porn.”

Thank you, Sondra.

The story that prompted that assessment?

The criminal complaint alleges Laack stole a bag of beef jerky and a lighter at a convenience store Thursday afternoon. Police went to her home.
[...]
Police entered and tried to calm her down. With her children present, the complaint said, she stripped to her underwear and told the officers they couldn’t arrest her because she would be naked.

Seriously, folks, we have got to start educating people on their real rights, and on how to behave around the cops. Where do people get these crazy ideas?

Texas Cops and Concealed Handgun Licensees

Monday, October 12th, 2009

This is anecdotal, not data, but I’m nevertheless very encouraged by it.

I had a long conversation with a Texas CHL holder, who also tends to drive perhaps a little faster than the law allows, and therefore has fairly regular contacts with the police. He explained that Texas cops, including Troopers and Rangers, often approach him with a very aggressive manner, but that when he presents his CHL, they immediately calm down, and typically remind him to watch the limit, and let him go with at most a warning.

It’s not, as my mom surmised when I told her this, that the cops are fearful of a citizen carrying a weapon.

It’s that they know that a CHL holder is far more likely than average to be a peaceable citizen. More importantly, they regard CHL holders to be allies. They know that if they get in trouble, a CHL holder who happens on the scene will more likely come to their aid than a non-licensed citizen.

In effect, Texas cops are extending the much-ballyhooed “professional courtesy” to CHL holders, at least with regard to traffic violations.

Driving Behind The Badge

Sunday, August 9th, 2009

Officer Smith wonders why drivers act hinky during stops:

The Officer Followed me for Like Eight Blocks Before He Stopped me…
[In traffic court, drivers] bring up the fact that I didn’t stop them until we were eight blocks away from where I said they committed the violation.

Why do people think this matters? Is there some publicly accepted rule that a police officer must stop you within a block of where you committed the violation? Do people really think there is something wrong with me not immediately stopping them?

When I explain that I had to put the radar down, pull into traffic and CATCH UP TO THEM first (four blocks), then I ran their license plate on my computer (another block or two), and THEN I found a SAFE place to stop them without blocking up the whole roadway, they still want to know why it took so long.

I guess I just don’t understand why people think this is going to suddenly make them not guilty…

I responded, a bit intemperately, perhaps, to explain why drivers do weird things during stops. (”Intemperate” because Officer Smith is talking about court, not the roadside, and no question, this is a dumb argument to bring up in court. But I believe that this thinking starts at the roadside, and builds in the minds of self-defenders until they think they should use it in court.)

Below is my response in full.

Every once in awhile, you or one of the other cop bloggers I read asks a question like this: Why do drivers say such stupid stuff? Are they all crazy? Are they all on drugs? Do they think we’re all stupid or corrupt?

I’m going to give you part of the answer. Mind, I’m not trying to get out of a ticket here, or to excuse recklessness, much less lawlessness. I’m just trying to explain, because you asked.

Have you been driving behind the badge for so long you’ve forgotten how nerve wracking it is to be followed by a police car?

Do you not remember that all of us have been followed by cops dozens of times in our lives? For you, it’s nothing. You’re not following anybody. You’re just getting to wherever it is you’re going, and in traffic, you have to be behind somebody, right? But for us, it’s blocks of sweating anxiety. Usually, almost always, you eventually pass us or turn off. Occasionally, the lights and sirens go on, and we piss our pants, cuss, pull over, wonder what we did wrong — and you drive past us to whatever call you just got.

Whenever these little things happen, we worry that we will do something wrong out of sheer nervousness. We all breath an enormous sigh of relief when you pass us or turn off. I’ve pulled into parking lots just to make sure you’re not following me. (And then there’s the times when I’ve wondered if I should turn in at my actual destination. Will that look suspicious if I really am being followed?) When we get there, we tell our friends and family about it, wonder what the hell it was all about, and hear their stories.

Very, very rarely, you are in fact pulling us over. We shit our pants, and think, No! Really? You actually stopped little ol’ me this time? What the hell did I do eight blocks ago?

Get it? We’re incredulous because usually when you follow us, you’re not following us.

Then there are the truly scary incidents.

I picked up a tail late one night on my way home from work. The squad car stopped alongside me at a light, waited for me to go through on green, then followed me through several turns for a lot more than eight blocks. The officers followed me up onto the freeway, immediately took the next exit, paced me on the service road, came back up behind me at the next access, followed me for two more exits, then got off and didn’t come back. No lights, no siren, and absolutely no clue on my part, then or now, what the hell that was about. I have to think they were trying to panic me into making a mistake.)

Ask my Mom about being followed for miles along a dark, lonely country road by a squad car that had picked her up, with no lights or siren, as she left work at the hospital. When she got home and parked in the attached garage, shaking and nearly weeping with fear, she watched as the car PULLED INTO OUR CIRCLE DRIVE, TURNED ITS HEADLIGHTS OFF, AND JUST SAT THERE, for about a quarter hour. Meanwhile, we were all cowering in the basement, convinced we were about to experience a home invasion launched from a hijacked squad car. Dad called the sheriff’s department, and was eventually told that a deputy had been concerned (for some reason that we were never told) about a middle-aged nurse driving home alone late at night (as she did every damn work night just fine, thank you). Nothing to worry about, folks. It’s for your protection. A few minutes later, the car drove off, the officers inside having not even bothered to knock on the door and apologize or explain personally. That was decades ago, and Mom is still angry and deeply offended by it all. It’s one of her regular stories.

(Good thing Dad’s a pacifist priest who doesn’t believe in the Second Amendment as strongly as he believes in the First, huh?)

The point is, most everybody I know has stories like these, and I run in reasonably law-abiding, working and professional middle class circles. I had a boss tell me his stories once. He’s friends with his cop brother-in-law, has gone on ride-alongs, and still worries when he’s being followed.

Do you truly not remember what these things are like for the unbadged? Particularly those of us for whom police contact is very out-of-the-ordinary, because we really do try to follow the law as far as we know it?

We haven’t been trained. We have no experience. (Although a few of us have heard that if we do act according to the script, that itself brings us under suspicion. No honest citizen should know exactly how to act around cops. God forbid we should actually refuse to incriminate ourselves, or refuse consent to search in lieu of a warrant or probable cause. Um, which side has taken the oath to uphold the Constitution?) We don’t know how the stop will turn out. We’re furious with ourselves for being heavy-footed, if we even know what’s wrong. (I’ve been stopped about five times in my life, twice without any idea why: once for no tail lights on a work truck, once because the officer transposed month and year on my inspection sticker. That’s 40% honest confusion. Should I mention the news story a few years ago about the PD that thought it would be fun to stop good drivers and give them Thanksgiving turkeys?) We’re nervous as all bloody hell, most of us, because what we do know is that our lives just got a lot more complex and likely a lot more expensive, and that for the duration of the stop, we are no longer remotely in control.

What we do know is that if we make any mistake at all, or if we just picked a cop having a bad day, we can end up tazed, beaten, and jailed, or even dead. Sure, I’m willing to believe you’re perfect, BtB, but how do I know it’s you, any more than you know I’m not a heavily armed gangster?

And you wonder why we act so oddly? Why we say crazy stuff? Why we’re just a little tense? A bit testy?

Has it been that long?