Archive for the ‘First Responders’ Category

“Trepanazine” Needs a PDR Writeup, Stat

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

So, your friendly neighborhood Ambulance Driver describes a malady for which “220 grains of Trepanazine” is the recommended treatment regimen.

You arrive on the scene for the unconscious male lying in the roadway, cruise slowly past the police cars blocking traffic, and without even getting out of your ambulance, you roll down the window and bark, “Leon! Get your ignorant ass outta the road! Someone runs over you, you might damage a perfectly good car!”

And not only does Leon obediently cease being an impediment to traffic flow, he also hobbles meekly to your ambulance and climbs aboard. You should have seen the face of the cops who called us.

Which is indeed educational, but WTF is “Trepanazine”? A Google search turns up no dosing info, no link to the manufacturer, no….Oh, wait.

“Trepanazine” as in “trepanning“, right? Drilling a hole in the skull to let out the evil spirits, or “remove the stone of madness”?
trepanning-Hieronymus_Bosch_053-w

Slight risk of lead poisoning with the dosage I believe AD refers to.

And I note that the 230 grain dose for close-range injection is far more common than 220 grains.
bullet45acp-w

Open Carry In Restaraunt Deters Armed Robbery

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Anecdotal, sure, but a hell of an anecdote.

Matt Brannan and J.P. Mitchell were dining in the Wafflehouse on Barrett Parkway at I-575 in Kennesaw at 4:45 in the morning recently when a scout for an armed robbery crew entered the restaurant to case it. At the time, Matt and J.P. thought he looked a little suspicious, as he was wandering around the small restaurant like he was looking for someone. Unknown to Matt and J.P., two cars full of armed robbers were parked behind the restaurant waiting for the scout’s report.

The scout saw that two of the customers were wearing holstered 1911 Springfield Mil-Spec .45 pistols, and he immediately turned and left the store.

Meanwhile, conscientious Cobb County Police Officer D. Lowe had noticed suspicious cars sitting behind the restaurant in the dark and decided to investigate. He caught men with masks and rifles who had been preparing to rob the Wafflehouse. The criminals informed the police that they had changed their mind upon discovering armed customers and were waiting for Matt and J.P. to leave.

Showing Up

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

Officer Krupke from Cop’n'attitude did. No, nothing special. Just showed up, did his eighteen hour shift, and went home.

When some of his fellow officers, “including supervisors”, decided to stay home behind the snow, he’s ticked at his department for reasons he didn’t go into, and the Days Inn he stayed at close to his station ripped him off.

Sometimes the simple stuff needs to be recognized, and this is one of those times. Thanks, Officer. And thanks to all the cops, firefighters, and medics who went out in the cold and snow and did what needed to be done.

The Power to License a Right Is the Power to Destroy It

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

The First Circuit has upheld the power of Massachusetts police to draw on and arrest a concealed carry license holder and seize his weapon even after he has displayed his license, because there is no mechanism to confirm the license is valid.

Understand: the police can threaten and arrest a law abiding citizen for exercising a Constitutionally protected right, a right he has, in addition, gone through considerable trouble to license, including the training so often demanded by citizen control fanatics like the Brady Campaign and Violence Policy Center.

He’s jumped through all the hoops, and still faces violent arrest and confiscation by an office who lectures him that he is “the only person allowed to carry a weapon on his beat”.

The case stems from a lawyer who sued a police officer after he was detained for lawfully carrying a concealed weapon while in possession of a license to carry concealed. According to the case opinion, the lawyer, Greg Schubert, had a pistol concealed under his suit coat, and Mr. Schubert was walking in what the court described as a “high crime area.” At some point a police officer, J.B. Stern, who lived up to his last name, caught a glimpse of the attorney’s pistol, and he leapt out of his patrol car “in a dynamic and explosive manner” with his gun drawn, pointing it at the attorney’s face.

Officer Stern “executed a pat-frisk,” and Mr. Schubert produced his license to carry a concealed weapon. He was disarmed and ordered to stand in front of the patrol car in the hot sun. At some point, the officer locked him in the back seat of the police car and delivered a lecture. Officer Stern “partially Mirandized Schubert, mentioned the possibility of a criminal charge, and told Schubert that he (Stern) was the only person allowed to carry a weapon on his beat.”

For most people, this would be enough to conclude that they were being harassed for the exercise of a constitutional right, but the officer went further, seizing the attorney’s pistol and leaving with it. Officer Stern reasoned that because he could not confirm the “facially valid” license to carry, he would not permit the attorney to carry. Officer Stern drove away with the license and the firearm, leaving the attorney unarmed, dressed in a suit, and alone in what the officer himself argued was a high crime area.

In effect, this ruling means that a concealed carry license — or any license, really — does not confer the protection of the law on the licensed activity, does not protect even the presumption of innocence, but merely protects you against charges actually being filed, and against conviction. Any suppressive action short of that is permissible.

“Shall not be infringed”. How the bloody hell is this not “infringement”?

QotD: “The System Worked”

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

Look, this is all over the place. It’s so obviously, blatantly wrong, nobody’s saying anything insightful about it. All you can really do is bug out your eyes and scream incoherently, or just sigh and click on to the next post, or go watch a movie or something.

Ladies and gentlemen, the finest hands your country is in [0:30]

“Baghdad” Janet “Nappies” Napolitano, Head Nanny:

One thing I’d like to point out here is that the system worked. Everybody played an important role here. The passengers and crew of the flight took appropriate action.

Even CNN’s commentator can’t quite keep the disbelief out of her voice. CNN is not playing with The Team on this one.

Some of the passengers did indeed do the right thing, although Nappies and her minions have done everything possible to render the passengers helpless.

Then there’s this:

We have no suggestion that he was improperly screened.

He got on the plane despite being on watch lists and despite warnings from his own family. How is that not “improper screened”?

Cold Fury:

This is never going to work if both the terrorist’s and the Administration’s pants are on fire.

Jonah Goldberg says the obvious about as well as anybody:

It is her basic position that the “system worked” because the bureaucrats responded properly after the attack. That the attack was “foiled” by a bad detonator and some civilian passengers is proof, she claims, that her agency is doing everything right. That is just about the dumbest thing she could say, on the merits and politically.

If the White House wants to assure people that it takes the war on terror seriously (a term Robert Gibbs used this morning by the way), they could start by firing this patenly unqualified hack.

Although Goldberg is generous (”patently unqualified hack”), you should read the whole thing; it’s short.

Oh, and I can’t pass over this [0:39]:

Within literally an hour to ninety minutes of the incident occurring, all 128 flights in the air had been notified to take some special measures in light of what had occurred.

When seconds count, TSA is an hour away, at least. With advice, not actual, you know, help.

Goldberg is far too generous. Napolitano, and the administration she is a part of, is not unqualified.

They’re on the other side.

Section 311 of US Code Title 10, “Militia: composition and classes”

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

Randy Barnett explores the role of the unorganized militia in fighting terrorism.

According to press reports, a passenger helped subdue the terrorist who was attempting to bring down Northwest #253. This again highlights the importance of the unorganized militia in asymetric warfare. In Saved by the Militia, I offered this analysis in the wake of the success of the general militia on United Airlines #93 in defending Washington from terrorist attack on 9/11:

The characterization of these heroes as members of the militia is not just the opinion of one law professor. It is clearly stated in Federal statutes. Perhaps you will not believe me unless I quote Section 311 of US Code Title 10, entitled, “Militia: composition and classes” in its entirety (with emphases added):

“(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are —

(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and

(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.”

I’m occasionally guilty of saying that the National Guard is not part of the militia, because it’s part of the Army. Now I know better.

Read the rest of Barnett’s article for a partial explanation of why the unorganized militia is also crucial to the security of a free state.

Yeah, We Get That A Lot

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

Blood In The Turnstiles:

A year ago, my native home town of Atlanta decided that people with CCW’s were ok to ride mass transit carrying their weapons.

And just like every other time the law abiding are allowed to exercise their rights, nothing happened.

It’s almost like the anti-gun forces are lying to us.

Answer: “Corduroy”

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

Question: What was Helen Keller’s favorite color?

(via AD’s twitter)

When Seconds Count….

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

…The police are putting on you hold for an hour.

…[T]he afternoon of May 5, at Phoenix Park near Turner Field, Jackie Gordon watched a middle-aged man in a yellow jumpsuit chasing children on the playground while exposing himself.

Gordon grabbed her cellphone and dialed the familiar number for help: 911. The police, she was told, were on their way.

They weren’t.

Instead, the 911 operator sent an electronic message to a dispatcher for the Atlanta Police Department, who held the call — for 56 minutes and five seconds — before sending an officer to Phoenix Park. The dispatcher had no choice: The police department had no one available to promptly respond to a report of a man demanding sex from children.

With too much crime and too few officers on the streets, Atlanta police dispatchers routinely hold such emergency calls even longer than the time in which officers are supposed to reach the scene, an investigation by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution shows.

Via War On Guns.


I’ve been asked recently what my stand on gay rights is.

How about this? My stand is that if you try to assault or kill someone for being gay, your victim should be armed and capable of defending themselves.

Talking about the the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, recently signed into law by President Hopey, Kurt Hofmann points out:

Even the title of the bill is misleading: ” . . . Hate Crimes Prevention Act”? Laws don’t “prevent” crimes; they punish them, after the fact. Sure, it’s to be hoped that laws, and the negative consequences of breaking them, will act as a deterrent, but if that deterrence were very reliably effective, we would presumably not have a prison population of over 2 million.

Will the family and friends of the next Matthew Shepard or James Byrd, Jr. take much comfort in the fact that the killers will now face these new, federal penalties? Would they not instead vastly prefer that the “hate criminals” were stopped in their tracks?

Hofmann includes the obligatory link to the Pink Pistols.


Speaking of self-defense, for any reason, here’sPhilip Van Cleave, the President of Virginia Citizen Defense League, arguing for concealed carry on college campuses — and, by the way, concealed carry, open carry, night stand carry, what ever:

Myth after myth, shot down by cold hard facts.

On the Virginia Tech campus.

And, yeah, it’s all anecdotal evidence. But here’s the thing: these kinds of incidents are so rare, all the evidence on both sides is, essentially, anecdotal. What the available statistics do show is that at the very least, permitting people to arm themselves does not increase the number of bad things happening. Like seatbelts, yes, wearing a seatbelt sometimes causes problems — but the way to bet is that you are safer wearing a seatbelt, or a gun.

“What does it matter if I’m standing here, or if I leave campus…? Why is my life not valuable on one side of a line…and totally valuable and I’m a great citizen on the other…?”

“What’s so bad about self-defense, and what’s so good about being a helpless, unarmed student being murdered?”

God Kills Sarah Brady’s Kittens

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

So Ambulance Driver went to Blogarado, a blogmeet/shootfest. And took pictures. And told stories.

Then there was this:

Saturday dawned bright and early with KatyBeth sitting astride my chest and patting me gently on the face, saying, “Wake up, Daddy! It’s time to go shoot!”

However, no pictures of Katy Beth shooting followed, and accordingly I whined in comments:

Wait, no pictures of Katy Beth shooting? I need that for my Kids Having Dangerous Fun collection.

And lo, today I ventured on to AD’s site, after taking all appropriate safety precautions, and under the heading “From the ‘Kids Having Dangerous Fun’ Files”, found:KatyBeth-5-1024x789

Plus two more piccies of wonderful squee! value.

AD, what can I say? In gratitude, I promise that if I ever have to fake a seizure for you, I’ll pee my pants.