Archive for the ‘Dammit!’ Category

Salt Police! Drop That Shaker Buddy!

Friday, March 12th, 2010

The dextrosphere has been sneering and sputtering at New York State Assemblyman Felix Ortiz (Commie-Dem Brooklyn), who wants to pass a law forbidding restaurants to add salt to their food. Of course, Ortiz is an ignorant arrogant jack boot who wants to run everyone’s life down to the tiniest detail, and therefore deserves every word of ridicule he gets. (Although for some reason, the ignorant putzes in Brooklyn keep returning him to office. They deserve whatever they get. We don’t.)

The Munchkin Wrangler, however, is the first to point out exactly why Ortiz is so dangerous, and what he means for the national scene:

Here’s a question for my progressive liberal friends:

Is this the kind of future you want? One where omnipotent busybodies keep passing laws forcing people to eat well, get enough sleep, don’t do dangerous sports, don’t use hurtful language?

And if you think this nonsense isn’t going to increase tenfold once we have some sort of public health care system, think again. Taxpayer-funded or –subsidized healthcare is a universal adapter for stupid nanny state legislation. Listen to Assemblyman Felix Ortiz:

“It’s time for us to take a giant step,” Ortiz said yesterday. “We need to talk about two ingredients of salt: health care costs and deaths.”

Once the public pays for your doctor’s visits, people like Assemblyman Ortiz are going to see it as their natural and primary responsibility to make sure you’re living well, because the argument will be “We’re all paying for it, after all”. (Politicians will be under constant pressure to keep the tab down, so they’ll issue a never-ending stream of legislative proposals related to having you use those public health services as little as possible.) It’s exactly the lever needed to force everyone to do what has been decreed to be best for them. After all, there’s no aspect of life that isn’t related to physical well-being. Do you really want to give up your autonomy for “free” health care?

Read the whole thing, of course; Wrangler deserves the traffic. But that’s the nut of the thing, the poison pit in the rotting peach of mandated health care.

The Gipper Versus The One

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Ronald Reagan explains exactly what Obama is doing, and Obama explains exactly what he’s doing. Amazingly, the explanations match up perfectly. Reagan has Obama nailed.

Via Riehl World View.

It’s the Endarkenment, folks, writ plain, writ loud and proud. Obama’s accomplishing exactly what he and his mentors intended.

“Honey, Does This Saddle Make My Ass Look Fat?”

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Of course, any male who saw Disney’s Fantasia in his adolescence has a bit of a centaur filly fetish.

It may be a sign of my geekiness, however, that even as a besotted teenager, I had a bit of literal “refrigerator logic”. To wit, “How do they eat?

Today, with the Webz and all, I had the opportunity to work out some rough calculations.

To start with, A 1000 pound horse requires about 15,000 Calories a day, that’s big-C Calories. Horse digestive tracts are very inefficient, and require about 25 pounds a day of mixed fodder, that is, forage (hay) and concentrate (oats, molasses, corn, and the like). Obviously, there’s no way for a human mouth, with human teeth, to chew through 25 pounds a day of horse feed.

And let’s not talk about grazing with a flat face.

Of course, the far more efficient human digestive tract can eat much more concentrated foods, like meat. Maybe that helps. Accordingly, the following numbers are based on scaled-up human internals.

A pound of sugar is 1760 Calories. That means that a centaur eating pure sugar needs about 8-1/2 pounds of sugar every single goddamn day.

A pound of fried bacon is 2448 Calories; a carnivorous centaur would want about 6 pounds a day. (I choose bacon because a] it’s tasty and b] it’s a nice mix of protein and fat.)

Then there’s fiber. A human on a 2000 C/day diet needs about 25 g/day. Converting to pounds and scaling up to 15,000 C/day yields about 1/2 lb/day of pure, indigestible fiber. “I buy ‘er books and buy ‘er books and she just eats the cov… uhp, nope, just swallowed the whole damn thing. ”

Hah, hah, nobody eats books! So let’s look into apples…. Holy, uh, crap. There’s about 0.7 g of fiber in an apple. Converting to pounds, that’s in excess of 320 apples a day to keep the vet away.

But at least you now have an excellent excuse to wash down your meals with, yes:
Bacon Stein
…A bacon beer mug, which will help a little with the 8 or 10 gallons a day of water a lightly worked horse will need. Or, hey, splurge, and have a candied bacon ice cream float for dessert.

Of course, no body eats exclusively any one kind of food.

A Big Mac is about 540 Calories. Now, a Big Mac contributes to nutrition in several different ways, but going by calories alone, my hooved belooved would not be a cheap date: she’d need about 27 a day, at a cost of around a hundred bucks.

If she wants fries with that, she’d need about 13 Big Mac meals with medium fries and Coke. That’s a bit of a savings, only $80.

The dietary math is a little easier if your centaur chassis has a pony form-factor. Multiply everything by about 0.7, but remember, equines can only carry about a fifth of their weight. I’m too heavy for a 1000-lb horse; only a very lean young man, weighing at most 125 lbs, could ride his 700 lb pony girlfriend.

[update]
And speaking of ponies, note that Disney’s fillies are not only very small ponies, but lack the pot belly evident on real ponies. They have human digestive systems, not equine, and indeed, they later appear at a human-style banquet — although not with centaur-sized portions.

I was referred to Celesta, a photo-morphed image by “The Phantom Inker” of a lady centaur. Note how her human torso seems way too small for the horse body. She would be better proportioned as a pony. I may have to fool around with that.
celesta_centaur_by_phantom_inker_w


[/update]

Then there’s breathing. The breath-to-breath measurement is called tidal volume.

For humans, tidal volume is about 0.5 liters.

For horses? About 6.0 liters, twelve times what a human needs. That means nostrils, and a windpipe, about four times the diameter of a human’s. And those are resting values.


So, conclusion?

No. Hell, no. You can’t eat like a horse, or even breath like a horse, through a human mouth.


Update:
Heh. I’m pointed to this episode of The Wotch. The young lady is a centaur who hides her equine body with an invisibility spell; we, of course, are not affected.

Don’t Listen To Ayn Rand; She Worshipped A Killer.

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

Instead, wear T-Shirts celebrating kind, decent friends of the people like Che, Marx, Lenin, and even Stalin.

Not a “text book sociopath” like Ayn Rand.

There’s something deeply unsettling about living in a country where millions of people froth at the mouth at the idea of giving health care to the tens of millions of Americans who don’t have it, or who take pleasure at the thought of privatizing and slashing bedrock social programs like Social Security or Medicare. It might not be as hard to stomach if other Western countries also had a large, vocal chunk of the population who thought like this, but the US is seemingly the only place where right-wing elites can openly share their distaste for the working poor. Where do they find their philosophical justification for this kind of attitude?

It turns out, you can trace much of this thinking back to Ayn Rand, a popular cult-philosopher who exerts a huge influence over much of the right-wing and libertarian crowd, but whose influence is only starting to spread out of the US.

One reason why most countries don’t find the time to embrace her thinking is that Ayn Rand is a textbook sociopath. Literally a sociopath: Ayn Rand, in her notebooks, worshiped a notorious serial murderer-dismemberer, and used this killer as an early model for the type of “ideal man” that Rand promoted in her more famous books — ideas which were later picked up on and put into play by major right-wing figures of the past half decade, including the key architects of America’s most recent economic catastrophe — former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan and SEC Commissioner Chris Cox — along with other notable right-wing Republicans such as Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Rush Limbaugh, and South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford.

The loudest of all the Republicans, right-wing attack-dog pundits and the Teabagger mobs fighting to kill health care reform and eviscerate “entitlement programs” increasingly hold up Ayn Rand as their guru. Sales of her books have soared in the past couple of years; one poll ranked “Atlas Shrugged” as the second most influential book of the 20th century, after The Bible.

Does the author of this piece, Mark Ames, wear T-shirts emblazoned with Che, Marx, Lenin, or Stalin? Beats the heck out of me. But it’s clear from his article that far worse, he embraces their ideas, and thus the mass murder of millions.

Even if Rand burned candles to William Edward Hickman, the man she’s accused of admiring, her ideas have caused nowhere near the slaughter that Marx and his worshippers committed, and continue to commit to this day.

Population Bomb

Saturday, February 27th, 2010

Hey, Mouth Breathing Breeders! You aren’t doing your job! Get with the program!
Mark Steyn:

What’s happening in the developed world today isn’t so very hard to understand: The 20th-century Bismarckian welfare state has run out of people to stick it to. In America, the feckless, insatiable boobs in Washington, Sacramento, Albany, and elsewhere are screwing over our kids and grandkids. In Europe, they’ve reached the next stage in social-democratic evolution: There are no kids or grandkids to screw over. The United States has a fertility rate of around 2.1 — or just over two kids per couple. Greece has a fertility rate of about 1.3: Ten grandparents have six kids have four grandkids — ie, the family tree is upside down. Demographers call 1.3 “lowest-low” fertility — the point from which no society has ever recovered. And, compared to Spain and Italy, Greece has the least worst fertility rate in Mediterranean Europe.

So you can’t borrow against the future because, in the most basic sense, you don’t have one. Greeks in the public sector retire at 58, which sounds great. But, when ten grandparents have four grandchildren, who pays for you to spend the last third of your adult life loafing around?

Meanwhile, we ecologically responsible metrosexuals will be modeling our new trousers.
isabel_mastache_fall_winter_2010_cibeles_es_es_1266566285203

Self-Defense Against Thugs Via the Second Amendment

Saturday, February 20th, 2010

“Thugs, crack-headed and jack-booted,” a phrase I often use when I argue the Second, refering to citizens defending themselves against common crooks and government would-be tyrants.

Mayor Bloomberg is high on the tyrant list, with his “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” campaign, and his own, apparently illegal campaign to entrap gun dealers in other states into selling guns to prohibited persons he hired for his little scam.

Now comes Gun Owners against Illegal Mayors, which has the run down on almost a dozen members of the MAIG campaign, mayors who have themselves been convicted of felonies.

There’s a reason these thugs want you disarmed, people: like all criminals, it’s a lot easier to rob you if you’re helpless.

The Power to License a Right Is the Power to Destroy It

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

The First Circuit has upheld the power of Massachusetts police to draw on and arrest a concealed carry license holder and seize his weapon even after he has displayed his license, because there is no mechanism to confirm the license is valid.

Understand: the police can threaten and arrest a law abiding citizen for exercising a Constitutionally protected right, a right he has, in addition, gone through considerable trouble to license, including the training so often demanded by citizen control fanatics like the Brady Campaign and Violence Policy Center.

He’s jumped through all the hoops, and still faces violent arrest and confiscation by an office who lectures him that he is “the only person allowed to carry a weapon on his beat”.

The case stems from a lawyer who sued a police officer after he was detained for lawfully carrying a concealed weapon while in possession of a license to carry concealed. According to the case opinion, the lawyer, Greg Schubert, had a pistol concealed under his suit coat, and Mr. Schubert was walking in what the court described as a “high crime area.” At some point a police officer, J.B. Stern, who lived up to his last name, caught a glimpse of the attorney’s pistol, and he leapt out of his patrol car “in a dynamic and explosive manner” with his gun drawn, pointing it at the attorney’s face.

Officer Stern “executed a pat-frisk,” and Mr. Schubert produced his license to carry a concealed weapon. He was disarmed and ordered to stand in front of the patrol car in the hot sun. At some point, the officer locked him in the back seat of the police car and delivered a lecture. Officer Stern “partially Mirandized Schubert, mentioned the possibility of a criminal charge, and told Schubert that he (Stern) was the only person allowed to carry a weapon on his beat.”

For most people, this would be enough to conclude that they were being harassed for the exercise of a constitutional right, but the officer went further, seizing the attorney’s pistol and leaving with it. Officer Stern reasoned that because he could not confirm the “facially valid” license to carry, he would not permit the attorney to carry. Officer Stern drove away with the license and the firearm, leaving the attorney unarmed, dressed in a suit, and alone in what the officer himself argued was a high crime area.

In effect, this ruling means that a concealed carry license — or any license, really — does not confer the protection of the law on the licensed activity, does not protect even the presumption of innocence, but merely protects you against charges actually being filed, and against conviction. Any suppressive action short of that is permissible.

“Shall not be infringed”. How the bloody hell is this not “infringement”?

Flyers = Gunnies

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

WizardPC, manning the Walls of the City, points out that the new TSA directives promulgated in the wake of the Christmas Bombing, works in exactly the same way as current gun regulations:

  • Unaccountable Government Agency with the power to ruin your life over seemingly minor transgressions? Check!
  • Assumption that you’re up to no good based solely on lawful activity? Check!

…And three more items. As one of Wiz’s commenters notes, this only applies to international travelers, but come on, people, do you really believe that officials like Napolitano don’t want to impose them universally?

After all, many of our current gun control laws got started after the Civil War, and were only supposed to keep uppity black folk from resisting the KKK and other bastions of law and order; they were never intended to be used against decent white Americans.

QotD: “The System Worked”

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

Look, this is all over the place. It’s so obviously, blatantly wrong, nobody’s saying anything insightful about it. All you can really do is bug out your eyes and scream incoherently, or just sigh and click on to the next post, or go watch a movie or something.

Ladies and gentlemen, the finest hands your country is in [0:30]

“Baghdad” Janet “Nappies” Napolitano, Head Nanny:

One thing I’d like to point out here is that the system worked. Everybody played an important role here. The passengers and crew of the flight took appropriate action.

Even CNN’s commentator can’t quite keep the disbelief out of her voice. CNN is not playing with The Team on this one.

Some of the passengers did indeed do the right thing, although Nappies and her minions have done everything possible to render the passengers helpless.

Then there’s this:

We have no suggestion that he was improperly screened.

He got on the plane despite being on watch lists and despite warnings from his own family. How is that not “improper screened”?

Cold Fury:

This is never going to work if both the terrorist’s and the Administration’s pants are on fire.

Jonah Goldberg says the obvious about as well as anybody:

It is her basic position that the “system worked” because the bureaucrats responded properly after the attack. That the attack was “foiled” by a bad detonator and some civilian passengers is proof, she claims, that her agency is doing everything right. That is just about the dumbest thing she could say, on the merits and politically.

If the White House wants to assure people that it takes the war on terror seriously (a term Robert Gibbs used this morning by the way), they could start by firing this patenly unqualified hack.

Although Goldberg is generous (”patently unqualified hack”), you should read the whole thing; it’s short.

Oh, and I can’t pass over this [0:39]:

Within literally an hour to ninety minutes of the incident occurring, all 128 flights in the air had been notified to take some special measures in light of what had occurred.

When seconds count, TSA is an hour away, at least. With advice, not actual, you know, help.

Goldberg is far too generous. Napolitano, and the administration she is a part of, is not unqualified.

They’re on the other side.

When I Said “Boughs”….

Thursday, December 24th, 2009

…I meant “bunches of green leafy twigs”, not “heavy dead branches”; and when I said “holly”, I didn’t mean “pine”; and when I said “halls”, I didn’t mean “my car”; and most of all, when I said “deck”? I meant “hang decoratively, with care, even”, not, most definitely not “BASH A BLOODY GREAT HOLE IN THE REAR WINDOW!”

Ah, yes, traditional Houston holiday weather: rain, wind, and flying debris.
BoughsOfPine-w450


This has been floating around for a few years, but I still love it:
All My Liberal Friends:
Please accept with no obligation, implied or explicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low-stress, non-addictive, gender-neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasion and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all. I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2010, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make America great. Not to imply that America is necessarily greater than any other country nor the only America in the Western Hemisphere. Also, this wish is made without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith or sexual preference of the wishee.

To All My Conservative Friends:
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR!